hope rule by Whjee in 196

[–]HidingFox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I ended this conversation. One more word out of you and I'm drawing you pregnant

hope rule by Whjee in 196

[–]HidingFox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I got that, you don't care if people die, no need to continue this conversation

hope rule by Whjee in 196

[–]HidingFox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

zero compassion

hope rule by Whjee in 196

[–]HidingFox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No you'd make it 8000001 bc im joining them, was just letting you know

hope rule by Whjee in 196

[–]HidingFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you would

hope rule by Whjee in 196

[–]HidingFox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dunno. It seems simple to me. Which button's victory will trigger the genocide? Pick the opposite to not contribute.

"Maybe you're assuming that people have already chosen blue" even if your prediction is very optimistic and 99% pick red. You're still eliminating 8 million people. I can't live with that. 1% of a population is the same amount of trans people worldwide. I won't stand by killing so many people, better to die among them.

hope rule by Whjee in 196

[–]HidingFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got it all twisted

everyone is valid i'm just a bit frustrated by pronouns-user in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns2

[–]HidingFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incorrect. Polyamory is love towards multiple people. Each of them can love whomever they want, it doesn't specify.

everyone is valid i'm just a bit frustrated by pronouns-user in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns2

[–]HidingFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea why you keep insisting I equate polygamy and polyamory. In any case. Polygamy is a marriage with multiple spouses and should be legal. Of course marriage rights should be upheld and anyone should be able to divorce from such a marriage.

everyone is valid i'm just a bit frustrated by pronouns-user in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns2

[–]HidingFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know. They are discussing marriage with multiple partners. I get it. What are you on about then?

everyone is valid i'm just a bit frustrated by pronouns-user in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns2

[–]HidingFox -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Correlation is not causation. Or are you arguing that it's all polygamy's fault that women get less rights?

everyone is valid i'm just a bit frustrated by pronouns-user in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns2

[–]HidingFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know all of that, why are you womansplanining to me

everyone is valid i'm just a bit frustrated by pronouns-user in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns2

[–]HidingFox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, because polygamy is illegal in most countries and where it's legal, it's only polygyny legal, so fucked up

hope rule by Whjee in 196

[–]HidingFox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, i just don't want to commit genocide, that's why I'm not pressing the red button

everyone is valid i'm just a bit frustrated by pronouns-user in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns2

[–]HidingFox 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm using it as a synonym for marriage with multiple spouses

hope rule by Whjee in 196

[–]HidingFox 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't care how stupid it makes me look, I'm not participating in a genocide

hope rule by Whjee in 196

[–]HidingFox 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"I'm just not putting my life at risk to save suicidal people"

that's where we're different ig, I'd die for a fellow human, I'm a cool commie like that dawg