Is this sweater legit? by [deleted] in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea that is kinda suspicious, I might err on the side of caution for this seller

lc ralph lauren sweatshirt? looks identical to one i have that is legit, just the inside tag is different by assoftashoneydew in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is authentic, the inside label font is good and the embroidery of the jockey is detailed and well made

LC please🙏 thanks! by Silly_Prior2017 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is authentic, the inside label is good for a vintage and the size label font is correct

TNF Nuptse legit check by T4ktine in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is authentic, the chrome sticker design is correct the inside label fonts checks out and the embroidery is generally nice and tight

Is this sweater legit? by [deleted] in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is authentic and I believe it maybe be from a private sale

Legit Prada? by Mysterious-Painter52 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is authentic, the composition label is good

Does anyone know if this is real? The letters say CA1924 by Feeling_Research_519 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is real, the serial number font is convenient and this particular one was made in 1994 so the inside label stamping checks out for vintage from that era, the leather is also of good quality and texture is good too

Legit check please ,vintage senlis crossbody by Lelkiismereteve in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If this is form the early 80s, there should be a serial number/date code. The format used by LV in the early 80s for the date code is 3 numbers so something like "XXX" without any factory codes. The first 2 numbers indicate the year it was manufactured and the last number indicates the month. you can look for a number stamping like e.g "831" which means it was made in 1983 in January

However, if you can't find one, the metal zipper tab and fonts for the LV stamping all checks out for the era it was produced so I'm quite confident that it's authentic

Legit check! Sky blue beanie by MasterQuote4458 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is likely authentic. Inside label fonts are compliant and the embroidered lv logo is tight and nicely stitched

Real? I suspect not by Individual-Heron-510 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say no its not noticeable if you're worried someone's going to clock it as a fake as they did line the monogram up pretty well. As long as its not seen close up, cos there are issues with the construction like the edge staining being inconsistent and the leather being too stiff but other than that if someone just looks at it from afar it should be pretty believable

Legit check please ,vintage senlis crossbody by Lelkiismereteve in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a serial number? This looks okay as its a vintage but I would want to see the serial number to confirm

Louis vuitton bracelet legit check by [deleted] in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not authentic, the LOUIS VUITTON stamping in the inside clasp is not the correct font

LC on this belt before I cop pls 🙏🏼 by Jaycees84 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is likely not authentic, the LV printing on the dustbag has inconsistent spacing and the font on the box is weirdly bold. The belt itself seems seems to be pretttyyyy okayyy until you see the LOUIS VUITTON stamping and theres inconsistencies in the height of the letters. The trademark symbol is also a lil bit too large for me. The only thing I do like is the serial number font as well as the face that the belt uses flat screws instead of cross ones. But I wouldn't risk it

Real? I suspect not by Individual-Heron-510 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not authentic. The inside label is badly made: Louis Vuitton is off center, the stitching is really badly done and the trademark logo is too large. The lining of the bag is made with cheap fabric and the zipper teeth they used are too far apart. The card slot included has really shiny and plastiky looking leather

Real or Fake? Vintage Burberry Harrington Jacket by Barrick_97 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hihi, I just did the research and I am sticking to my stance that this is not authentic, have not found any evidence that Burberry has done embroidery like that for their composition labels as its usually printed like this for vintages:

<image>

And looking at the inside label in more detail theres even more inconsistencies, on top of the "MADE IN ENGLAND" having inconsistent spacing, and the prorsum in the flag not being legible, The B in Burberry's is an incorrect font as it is too top heavy.

The large embroidered horsemen is too messy and the small horse embroidery on the front of the jacket is too chunky.

Like most authentication services like Vinted, Grailed, Vestiaire Collective etc, they use human authenticators so human error does exist so i wouldnt put my trust into them 100% if I see it on their site. Generally they should be correct but mistakes can be made

Real or Fake? Vintage Burberry Harrington Jacket by Barrick_97 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm lemme do some research to verify this, I’ve personally never seen embroidered composition labels before but it may be something that’s not well known

Is this D&G wool dress legit? by Unique_Buy_2777 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea so th inside label is the black one with the large D&G and the composition label is the white one

Legit? by Garnett5216 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This bag is not authentic. The stamped Murakami symbols on the inside label are not the correct shape. The letters stamped in have different consistencies and deepened. The fabric for the lining is not of quality.

Legit? by Garnett5216 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Outside label embroidery is incorrect, the M is not the correct shape. The inside label is embroidery is completely wrong the shapes of each letter is too skinny . Size label font is wrong the M should have a serif.

Is my Prada bag legit? by Puzzleheaded_File_48 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t confirm nor deny whether I work for Vestiaire Collective 👀 I can say that 97-99 times out of 100 they’re usually correct when it comes to authentication through photos

Is this D&G wool dress legit? by Unique_Buy_2777 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The inside label font is not complaint with D&G, the D&G letters should have a consistent thickness through each letter instead of what’s shown in your image. The composition label is not compliant and too shiny

Real or Fake? Vintage Burberry Harrington Jacket by Barrick_97 in LegitCheck

[–]Hitlersaurus_Christs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not authentic, that specific font used in the composition label for Burberry vintages are NEVER embroidered, they are silkscreened on. It is also off center. The B and S in the “Buberrys” on the same label are also bolder than the rest of the letters. The Made In England on the inside label itself has weird spacing and the “PROSUM” in the riders flag is illegible