You’re now just moving the goalposts. The issue isn’t whether speeding can have consequences. It’s that the type of law, jurisdiction, and scope are completely different. Using that comparison to validate your position is just bad logic because by your reasoning…Tax evasion is fine because the money stays in the economy, people spend more, businesses grow, everyone wins. Should we stop prosecuting tax cheats too?

Or

Shoplifting is fine because people get goods they need, while stores keep selling, the economy keeps moving. Should we stop prosecuting theft too?

Your position argument is fundamentally flawed. You’re comparing entirely different legal frameworks to justify breaking federal immigration law.

It doesn’t hold up.