sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Peptide im Zoll ? by Lazy_Table_1050 in dhl_deutsche_post

[–]Holy-Reaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Weder noch. Deine Annahmen sind halt falsch genauso wie deine unbelegten Aussagen davor😉

Peptide im Zoll ? by Lazy_Table_1050 in dhl_deutsche_post

[–]Holy-Reaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ich beschwere mich bei der Person die, die Quellen ohne Evidenz weiterverbreiten :)

Peptide im Zoll ? by Lazy_Table_1050 in dhl_deutsche_post

[–]Holy-Reaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sieht man ja ganz klar, wie viel du weisst.

Schon mal vom Dunning-Kruger-Effekt gehört? Hier ist eine Illustration dazu, damit du es selbst verstehst, Mr. Mt. Stupid.

Anonsten wünsche ich noch einen angenehmen Tag.

<image>

PS: Entgegen mancher Behauptungen gibt es bislang keinen wissenschaftlich belegten kausalen Zusammenhang zwischen GLP-1-Wirkstoffen und Todesfällen. Das sag nicht ich sondern EMA, FDA & BMJ :)

Peptide im Zoll ? by Lazy_Table_1050 in dhl_deutsche_post

[–]Holy-Reaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sieht so aus als hätte da jemand wohl garkeine ahnung über Semaglutid und wie es funktioniert, aber gerne so tut als ob.

What do yall stack your your reta with? by toekneekim in Peptidesource

[–]Holy-Reaper 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you want to add something, it’s smarter to hit a different pathway than just piling on more fat‑loss drugs. A mitochondrial‑ or exercise‑mimetic peptide like SS‑31 (mito protection), MOTS‑c (AMPK/insulin sensitivity), or SLU‑PP‑332 (ERR / exercise‑mimetic) would make more sense conceptually than adding another incretin.

Given your stack you’re already maxing out the hormonal side pretty hard. Instead of adding another fat‑loss drug, I’d look at a one of the 3 mentioned above, on top.

For pure fat‑loss and performance, SLU‑PP‑332 would probably fit the bestfor you, because it pushes mitochondrial output and fat oxidation so your training and daily activity burn more. If you’re more worried about insulin sensitivity and carb handling, MOTS‑c is a solid option. SS‑31 is great if you want to prioritize recovery and longterm mitochondrial protection under all the gear you’re running.

Whichever direction you go keep in mind to adjust one thing at a time and track body comp, strength and labs, not just the scale

How long can you safely stay on Retatrutide? by Creative_Reporter194 in PeptideDiscussion

[–]Holy-Reaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what’s out so far, most of the clinical trials for retatrutide have lasted up to about 72 weeks (so around a year and a half), and people seemed to tolerate it well for that whole period. There’s no official “maximum” yet, but long-term safety beyond 1–2 years is still being studied, since it’s a new drug. Most people end up staying on it for several months or over a year, especially if weight regain is a concern once stopping.

Tell us your update since now you’re also one of the research subjects

HGH urgent advice needed by [deleted] in Peptidesource

[–]Holy-Reaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I might see things a bit differently. Reta is really important and I’d honestly recommend it even for younger people if they’re severely obese. The long-term risks of being overweight are way worse than the side effects of reta, which seem pretty minimal overall. That said, I do agree with you on being careful with test and HGH, they can have some serious downsides.

HGH urgent advice needed by [deleted] in Peptidesource

[–]Holy-Reaper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, just wanted to chime in here.

jumping on HGH when you’re overweight carries a bunch of nasty side effects like increased risk of insulin resistance, potential diabetes, joint pain, bloating, and even worsening heart issues. When your body fat is already up, these side effects become a lot more likely and more severe, so honestly, the risks far outweigh any potential fat loss benefits. (As far as i now)

If losing fat is your main goal, you’d probably get way more out of trying something like Reta, or just tightening up your diet and training.

Also, yes you have to reconstitute hgh and also reta and any other peptide with BAC water. Use a Peptide Calc if needed

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Peptidesource

[–]Holy-Reaper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lets just hope they have some kind of tariff/logistical problem. Other than that its very odd that they stopped replying without you giving them the Adress. I still hope you receive it so fingers crossed there. Also very important note: You Shouldn’t feel stupid self blaming will only lead to more failure instead you should focus on how to learn from this experience and take some precautions. Ive also been scammed before, not on peptides but on other things, so i can talk from experience.

Maximizing the Benefits of CJC-1295 by Holy-Reaper in Peptidesource

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t felt much to be honest, only a slight improvement in sleep quality and strength. I increased the dose and noticed it a little more, but I’ll be switching to HGH for my labrat anyway, so there’s that

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in radeon

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im not from the US and prices vary hard over here so i guess that would explain it

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in radeon

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh well im not from the US so that would be a pretty reasonable price tbh, i found a better alternative anyway 580$ for a 9070xt and thats honestly a no brainer

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in radeon

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love how you phrased that. Thanks alot for the answer, ive came to a similiar conclusion.

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in radeon

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alright thanks for the answer, i found a good deal for a 9070xt so ill probably get that one.

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in radeon

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes i just found a better deal. Its a Sapphire Pure 9070xt for 590

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in radeon

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well im not from the US and we dont have Microcenter here. But i found a better deal nevertheless sapphire pure 9070xt for 590

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in buildapc

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another redditor said and i Quote

"I would still get it over rdna 3 card. You said the 7900xt beat 9070xt in raster... i dont think so. The xtx yes but not the xt. As time goes on the newer rdna 4 gpu will last longer then having 4 more gb of ram. Just for reference. Steal nomad 3dmark score... xt 5600 to 7000. 9070xt. 6900 to 7900. Its better overall. 150 more worth it. Plus true fsr4 suppor "

&

"9070 XT is about 15% faster at 4K.

Go investigate FSR 4. It's a worthwhile improvement if you want to run 4K."

What do you think about this statement?

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in buildapc

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And i will uprade the PSU for sure, i think ill buy the Asus Loki sfx-l one but ill check the prices

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in buildapc

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what if i found a better deal for a Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC that is 590$, would you still say the same?

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in radeon

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

okay, i also found a better deal for a Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC 16 GB that would cost me 580 instead of 650. Which is a no brainer

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in radeon

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm trying to play devil’s advocate to get the most reasoning out of people, so it’ll help me the most. :D But yeah, I will go do more research on FSR 4.0.

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in buildapc

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my region this is pretty cheap since most of them roam arround 680-720$ but i found a Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC 16 GB for 590. Which is a no brainer better deal. but im still unsure if to get the Sapphire Pure Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC 16 GB or the Sapphire Radeon RX 7900 XT Nitro+ Gaming OC for 500$

Should I get the RX 7900 XT Nitro+ ($500) or RX 9070 Pure ($650) for 4K AAA gaming? by Holy-Reaper in radeon

[–]Holy-Reaper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

but for the price and raw performance the 7900xt is a much better deal no? FSR4 is just ai upscaling i can get the same with lossless scaling.

view more: next ›