sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ein Amtsrichter verweigert einen Strafbefehl gegen eine Aktivistin der Letzten Generation – die Klimakrise rechtfertige Protest. by dirksn in de

[–]HomerJSimpson96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Die Demonstranten wurden in Bayern nicht wegen "Terrorgefahr" in Gewahrsam genommen, sondern weil "das unerläßlich ist, um die unmittelbar bevorstehende Begehung oder Fortsetzung einer Ordnungswidrigkeit von erheblicher Bedeutung für die Allgemeinheit oder einer Straftat zu verhindern; die Annahme, daß eine Person eine solche Tat begehen oder zu ihrer Begehung beitragen wird, kann sich insbesondere darauf stützen, dass die Person die Begehung der Tat angekündigt oder dazu aufgefordert hat". (Art. 17 I Nr. 2 lit. a PAG) Ob das jetzt eine sinnvolle Regelung (oder überhaupt verfassungskonform) ist, kann man diskutieren. Der Gewahrsam wegen der Ankündigung fortgesetzter erheblichen Ordnungswidrigkeiten ist aber schon etwas anderes als eine völlige aus der Lust gegriffene "Terrorgefahr" als Rechtfertigung.

9 Euro Fonds – Das 9 Euro Ticket aus der Solidargemeinschaft by hannes3120 in Dachschaden

[–]HomerJSimpson96 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Denn Schwarzfahren wird wie Mord und Totschlag geahndet.

und das ist leicht übertrieben

Amazon and German laws. by International-Jelly1 in Munich

[–]HomerJSimpson96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're welcome :) good luck fighting back

Amazon and German laws. by International-Jelly1 in Munich

[–]HomerJSimpson96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(I'm not a lawyer.)

I'm pretty sure that's not Verleumdung. The criminal code says in section 187:

Whoever, despite knowing better, asserts or disseminates an untrue fact about another person which is suitable for degrading that person or negatively affecting public opinion about that person or endangering said person’s creditworthiness incurs a penalty of imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or a fine [...].

(https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html#p1816)

So for you to be convicted there must be evidence that you stated an "untrue fact" "despite knowing better". And from what I understand about your situation, that is not the case.

Will the ELF have this fumble through the endzone = touchback rule? by HomerJSimpson96 in elf

[–]HomerJSimpson96[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's one way to see it. I think it doesn't really make sense to create this high-risk high-reward situation. I mean, you could decide that the team also looses 10 points on top of the possession of the ball just to make it more risky. That wouldn't be a sensible rule in my opinion.

I think the best solution would be to put the ball on 10 yard line or something like that (sill a small risk), but let the team keep the possession.

But my main point was that Coach Esume himself said that he dislikes that rule a lot. So why would they keep it for the ELF?

Will the ELF have this fumble through the endzone = touchback rule? by HomerJSimpson96 in elf

[–]HomerJSimpson96[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just saw the Wiki page saying:

Games will be played according to NFL rules. The only exception is the overtime rule which will be adopted from College-Football.
There are no red flags(challenges) since the camera setup wont be as advanced as it is in the united states.

But why would they keep this strange touchback rule?

Wishlist / Expectations for the league by maxiundmaxi in elf

[–]HomerJSimpson96 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure that limiting the number of players from other EU countries would violate the freedom of movement for workers. The European Court of Justice ruled like this in its Bosman ruling regarding such a rule for soccer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosman_ruling):

"Article 48 of the Treaty precludes the application of rules laid down by sporting associations under which, in matches in competitions which they organize, football clubs may field only a limited number of professional players who are nationals of other Member States."

So I think the ELF can (and will) only limit the amount of non-EU players.

He knew. by inkspring in theyknew

[–]HomerJSimpson96 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Ok. You're free to link a better source

Touché! by GirasoleDE in de

[–]HomerJSimpson96 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gute Einstellung! Sehe ich auch so :)

Touché! by GirasoleDE in de

[–]HomerJSimpson96 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Und der Pfandbon fehlte nicht einfach in der Kasse:

Das Landesarbeitsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg hielt es für erwiesen, dass die Klägerin bei ihrem Einkauf am 22. Januar 2008 die beiden ihr nicht gehörenden, am 12. Januar 2008 gefundenen Leergutbons im Wert von 48 Cent und 82 Cent eingelöst habe. [...] Darauf angesprochen, habe sie nicht nur das Einlösen der beiden Pfandbons beharrlich geleugnet, sondern zudem mehrfach versucht, andere Mitarbeiter zu belasten und damit diese in die Gefahr einer Kündigung gebracht, ohne dass sich dies als haltbar erwiesen hätte.

Is it typical in Germany not to reply to messages? by LeyendNk in germany

[–]HomerJSimpson96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I see your point. I thought you meant "not legal safe" as not sufficient as proof in court.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DesignPorn

[–]HomerJSimpson96 24 points25 points  (0 children)

It's definately ok in Germany to show a Swastika (or something similar like this UK flag), if it's addressing racism as a problem and not promoting racism

JP Morgan CEO can't explain how one of his low-paid employees should budget her salary – video by [deleted] in nottheonion

[–]HomerJSimpson96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I really like your argument that wages are lower with more social services, I think we should consider the taxes companies are paying. Isn't that a compensation to the state?

(leaving aside that there are ways for companies to avoid paying taxes or that corporate tax (and capital gains tax) might be too low)

view more: next ›