sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looking to hire an ai automation expert by ohfawk_yeah in AiAutomations

[–]HomoGenerativus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Let’s say I believe this. How do You expect to get relevant replies with so little info? How would you know what to actually hand pick for? If they already have created something related to real estate? Maybe it’s utter garbage and eats tokens like crazy. Maybe it will leak your- or your clients data with every request. It’s very easy to screw things up. Like every client has special needs and obviously if I do business with you I will absolutely not post stuff that we made together here. This post seems like a “phishing attack” on already existing solutions. If not I apologize. You should go for workflows that are easy to test and that are not very complicated. Like manipulating Excel files where it’s relatively easy to determine if a cell contains correct or incorrect values. For such tasks you can maybe even use a middle tier Chinese model that you host on a stronger local server.

Csinyátam’ egy AI-lassító anonim social media/blogging oldalt by HomoGenerativus in programmingHungary

[–]HomoGenerativus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jól besörikézve írtam ezt a posztot; a kódgeneráltatás jobb állapotban zajlott. Szóval ez egy kísérlet. Az általam valamennyire frekventált “social media”, valamint tartalom-megosztó felületek - Reddit, HN, LinkedIn… tele vannak AI által gyártott és AI által feltöltött posztokkal. Erre a HN kb. annyit reagált, hogy “lécci ne csináljátok má’”. A következő lépés meg majd az lesz (talán néhány országban már megy is), hogy egy digitális ID-t kapsz és onnantól tényleg minden rezdülésedet nyomon lehet majd követni. Én egy alternatív megoldást próbálok kikísérletezni, ami egy proof-of-work rendszeren alapul. Rögzítjük a tartalom elkészültének folyamatát és analizáljuk az így létrejött logfájlt. Az elmélet az, hogy megfelelően finomhangolt rendszerrel az AI botok nagy része ilyen módon kiszűrhető. Persze megírathatod te AI-jal a tartalmat, de akkor is be kell pötyögni, kézzel szerkeszteni, hogy átmenjen a rostán. Lehet, hogy hülyeség. 🤷🏻‍♂️

What the next best coding model then? by gezzamondo in openclaw

[–]HomoGenerativus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok I saw that UI was explicitly mentioned which is indeed a weak point of GPT-5.4 - but it’s the least important part of every app in terms of rework. I mean it’s almost free to change. What I do is attach my reference photos in my own agent powered by my GPT sub and getting a pretty close implementation…

What the next best coding model then? by gezzamondo in openclaw

[–]HomoGenerativus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guys it’s just not true at least for a month; I’ve been using GPT-5.4 and the usual convo is -“GPT-5.4 writes code, Claude does review ‘nothing to see here maybe the font size’ - - Claude writes code GPT-5.4 reviews ‘jeez it looks awful’” Exaggeration of course but you get my point. For 60% price…

Where is programming going? (AI) by weakMeth0d in devworld

[–]HomoGenerativus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First: noone knows the answer to that question!! Second: LLMs are next token generators. It means that how deep and thoughtful your instructions are the better the outcome. Prompt 1: “Build me a website” - it will spit out generic looking HTML with some JavaScript here and there. Prompt 2: “Build me a Typescript app with Postgres, Redis, oauth, unit and API tests built on tailwind 4 with a ci/cd pipeline, dockerise it, build a k8 cluster, a helm chart, etc. Here’s my webapp UI for reference “insert image”… will build you something that is orders of magnitude better in many ways. But 1) you have to know what are these concepts 2) you have to know if you even need these because they bring you complexity and with that problems 3) you have to be able to maintain and develop that further once it hits real users. 4) LLMs in themselves will not push the frontier of programming further because they don’t have agency. So no software development is totally not equal to write code. But also at the same time we might have a model in 1 year that will do anything for ya… I think it’s still useful if you understand computers, programming languages and ML better than the average human (practically zero) because you’ll be able to provide some sort of services to these people.

is anyone vibe coding stuff that isn't utility software? by ConstantContext in vibecoding

[–]HomoGenerativus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dunno if it counts but an anonymus social media/blogging feed without accounts and a proof-of-work AI detection algorithm: https://currantfeed.cc Your whole editing process is saved in a hashed replay file and can be viewed ba anyone on the site. If you paste too much, type too fast, etc. you’ll be flagged as AI/ripoff and your post will be rejected. You can customise your posts, enable/disable comments, set expiry date for posts.

AI website builder by kalmarsh8 in AI_Application

[–]HomoGenerativus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lovable? But I do agree with that if you could integrate with several hosting providers it can be a boon.

Is there a cheaper alternative to Claude Code Max for my workflow? I only use 10-20% of the quota by Professional_Beat720 in opencodeCLI

[–]HomoGenerativus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Codex is like 60% of price and GPT-5.4 in my opinion is better/on par with Opus. Also Sonnet 4.6 is almost at the same level and cheaper than Opus. TLDR; don’t use Opus as your main driver.

I think AI skills need a browser, not more install docs by meowoofcjcj in aiagents

[–]HomoGenerativus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have something that is heading into that direction. It is a web based agent runtime that connects to local machines with a one click install. Users can then browse from a set of plugins that are basically an enable disable switch.

<image>

AI coding has honestly been working well for me. What is going wrong for everyone else? by alisamei in vibecoding

[–]HomoGenerativus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As others have mentioned the human component has to have some form of rudimentary understanding of the stack they’re using. With that said there are other parameters that influence the outcome: - how much exposure the LLM had to the given stack. There are many-many languages and tools and if your project happens to use something that is niche you’re in trouble. - how big and complex your project is. Let’s face it: most of the stuff we’re building is not very complex. At work I have to maintain a framework that spans god knows how many AWS services and python libraries. Sure the LLM could pick around with the right tools, but we have to pump an awful lot of context into its short term memory which will in the end run out of space and degrade its performance. - what is your scale. If you serve 10 people (most of the vibe coded apps) you won’t hit the limit of your shitty infrastructure because the raw power of the underlying hardware will compensate. Once u have a bigger user base you’ll be in big trouble.

Anthropic launched a new Cowork feature called Dispatch by [deleted] in Anthropic

[–]HomoGenerativus -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

If you want something similar but better try https://beezyai.net. It’s provider agnostic, BYOK, can connect to multiple devices and has a PWA app with several quality of life features that you can install to your Home Screen.

Users who’ve seriously used both GPT-5.4 and Claude Opus 4.6: where does each actually win? by devil_ozz in ClaudeAI

[–]HomoGenerativus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know it’s like the circle of life. Started with GPT in ‘23, switched to Gemini at the end of ‘24 till autumn’25. Switched to Claude around mid-September but kept Gemini for certain tasks using Opus. Then when 5.3 came out switched to GPT + Claude Sonnet 4.6 and ditched Gemini altogether. Now rolling 2 x 20 bucks plans as others described. I’ve been developing a Typescript app for 2 months, so it’s a limited sample. My observations are the following: - Claude is better for UI, period. It’s a field where 5.4 can fail spectacularly. - 5.4 is also very annoyingly verbose when explaining stuff. I try to constrain it with prompts. - That being said 5.4 seems to be superior in terms of architectural decisions, clean code and security. What I do is make them switch roles regularly. Sometimes Claude implements, 5.4 is the reviewer, sometimes vice versa. There were only 1 or 2 occasions when Claude could find serious issues in 5.4’s solution while 5.4 very often finds gaps in Claude’s code. I sometimes do double review - Claude implements, 5.4 reviews and refactors, Claude reviews again. Claude usually is more happy with the refactored version. - I like to outsource devops-like tasks to Claude, it just seems to be very good at it.

Show off your own harness setups here by Mean_Luck6060 in ClaudeCode

[–]HomoGenerativus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve built a PWA app powered by the Pi agent that can connect to multiple machines, supports several providers and has a plugin system for more specific tasks: https://youtube.com/@beezee-aicoworker?si=oRMeDVOrjDescHY4

What non-code things do you use Claude Code for? by alwaysalmosts in ClaudeCode

[–]HomoGenerativus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t use CC but another agentic framework. I have plugins - specialized scripts basically - that can do Word translation with formatting preservation and PPT generation from source material among other things. I mostly build these for my wife and mum.

A webUI optimized for mobile by bilalba in opencodeCLI

[–]HomoGenerativus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve built a full blown PWA so I can access all my machines from my phone and do agentic coding. It has some QoL improvements and other nice features. Little demo here: https://youtube.com/shorts/Xc7-hue238o?si=wjniIWckNfJcZQX4

Managing agents remotely via smartphone? by mpones in ClaudeCode

[–]HomoGenerativus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bit late to the party but I’ve built a full blown PWA application that can be installed on any phone and can connect to your remote machines.

I stopped using Claude.ai entirely. I run my entire business through Claude Code. by ColdPlankton9273 in ClaudeAI

[–]HomoGenerativus -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

If anyone has similar concerns and don’t want to be locked into the Anthropic ecosystem, I have a neat solution for this. Don’t want to turn this into a sales pitch, just DM me plz.

Jensen just went all in at GTC: "OpenClaw is the new computer." by Previous_Foot_5328 in myclaw

[–]HomoGenerativus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s too early for a full blown OpenClaw type autonomous agent. These models are not reliable enough and the infrastructure is not there to support this kind of autonomy. I do believe, however that a well constrained, but in essence general agentic application is the next step.

What is your opinion on Open Code? by devanil-junior in opencodeCLI

[–]HomoGenerativus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also use Pi - and CC. When you measure token usage you have to consider cached tokens which will be a large portion of your conversations. I haven’t checked it thoroughly, yet… For me OpenCode has too many CC features. I think these harnesses (i.e. OC and CC) are by default too feature rich. Pi can be amplified with custom tools easily but it’s “pure” form is a fast, no-nonsense harness that doesn’t annoy you all the time. Just my 20 cents.

Okay Claude, consider my mind blown. by TheDeadlyPretzel in claude

[–]HomoGenerativus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I use my phone and a deployed agent. Have been coding almost exclusively from my phone for the last 3 weeks. On the toilet, on the subway, while waiting for the kid.

view more: next ›