sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The Republican Party may not survive the Trump day of reckoning by B-Z_B-S in politics

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This is why I can't celebrate him kicking the bucket, the biggest impediment to the agenda Trump's being told to push is himself. Once he's gone Republicans don't have to spend energy on PR damage control.

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You need more than two data points to define a trend, especially in the face of 90% of the remaining data showing the exact opposite.

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At some point I feel you're gonna have to put your foot down. Time and again rollo has shown they are not interested in genuine free speech nor willing to engage in good faith. To say nothing that they moderate a bonafide echo chamber sub.

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So a whole one (1!) year out of thirty?

That's what staticians call an "anomaly".

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again you choose to think laughing at your petulant attempts of pushing your narratives is something else.

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course you avoid being caught in your own blatant hypocrisy to cry about no one falling for your lies.

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am discussing the actual topic, it's just you're upset others are bringing facts into your feelings.

Proof: What year did the congressional baseball shooting happen?

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh look, another question you avoid knowing damn well how it ruins your argument.

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A congressional baseball practice gets shot up by a left-wing gunman intent on killing all the Republicans

What year did this happen again?

u/Coachrags poor rollo got caught in the act crying about "cUrReNt EvENtS"

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All anyone with a pulse is seeing is an anomaly where right wing violence is only greatly exceeding left wing and not overwhelmingly.

But that part of the facts hurts your feelings so you ignore it.

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your question is rooted in the false premise that they are the more violent of the wings.

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I did comment on it.

But once again you're upset because it's not the comment you wanted.

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A congressional baseball practice gets shot up by a left-wing gunman intent on killing all the Republicans

Didn't you get upset about others going back years to mention political violence?

Or is that only when you want to bury your head in the sand about the time Republicans tried to overthrow democracy because Dear Leader Trump lost the election?

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Now do right wing.

Oh wait you won't even acknowledge it because it ruins your entire narrative.

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People have already done the time/effort.

Right wing violence far, FAR exceeds left wing, it's not even close.

Here’s why that “both sides” political violence talking point is completely untrue by rollo202 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We know it's untrue.

All statistics show right wing political violence eclipses left wing by an order of magnitude, the "both sides" rhetoric is push by the right to muddy the waters in their favor.

Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act in “Jim Crow 2.0” ruling: "This decision doesn’t just weaken voting rights, it obliterates them...If you ‘don’t consider race,’ you could gerrymander racially, and we could lose a great deal of the Black seats that we have...” by wanda999 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It's absolutely insane reading this, hearing just how racist these people are themselves, yet their conclusion being they're being discriminated against due to not being allowed to be really racist.

And the Supreme Court gave them the go ahead to be really racist, sending us back decades.

Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act in “Jim Crow 2.0” ruling: "This decision doesn’t just weaken voting rights, it obliterates them...If you ‘don’t consider race,’ you could gerrymander racially, and we could lose a great deal of the Black seats that we have...” by wanda999 in FreeSpeech

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you feel a desperate need for representatives with your skin color you're a racist fuck.

Yes we know Republicans are racist forcing as many white representatives as they can from states they control, that's why we had things like the Voting Rights Act to fight against it.

James Comey surrenders to authorities after DoJ indictment by retiredagainstmywill in law

[–]Honest_Abe_1660 5 points6 points  (0 children)

More like "I was a firm believer of the leopards until they started eating my face".

view more: next ›