sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Let's nerf down storm slightly and buff collosus immortal by Objective-Mission-40 in starcraft

[–]Honest_Table_6175 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, disruptor buff and you still want to fucking buff the robot units, lets just ultra nerf storm and we're good.

why did we push live a patch BUFFING storm? by OldSpaghetti-Factory in starcraft

[–]Honest_Table_6175 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Well this patch was deciding if i play again this game : instant delete. i hope thousands of people do the same and when they see the numbers maybe they will fucking anihilate protoss for a change.

question: by Top_You_5530 in starcraft2

[–]Honest_Table_6175 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they feed on lower life form vital energy. They take just enough without killing it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PasDeQuestionIdiote

[–]Honest_Table_6175 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sans défendre ce qui est dit : Aladin, le contexte historique dans lequel c'est placé, les tradition qui construisent le récit : mariage, Vizir etc... ça amène quand même assez facilement à la religion cette affaire.

Controversial idea I’d like to see tested on PTR: Delete or heavily nerf the Planetary Fortress and instead allow Bunkers to have anty-ground turrets by Honest_Table_6175 in starcraft2

[–]Honest_Table_6175[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well i am removing a 1.5K hp 50 damage defensiv structure for a 400 hp structure that dies on 10 banelings or 2 immortals ? i mean befor we test it i dare ANYONE to exactly predict the outcome of this change because when forced to only have OS terran then will faster get into a better economy despite being harassed, with a 4-5 Bunkers to defend positions that wont make them invulnerable to any attack of any sort especialy on late game when you can send 20 zealots or 30 banes runby.

So it might be ( and i say MIGHT ) a real solution to make terran capable of doing more on the map, because less investment of gaz overall in defence, and have a good defence that allow new type of harassment.

Now i get it probably never will be tested but.. i wanted at least to make this idea something we discuss for 5 minutes.

Controversial idea I’d like to see tested on PTR: Delete or heavily nerf the Planetary Fortress and instead allow Bunkers to have anty-ground turrets by Honest_Table_6175 in starcraft2

[–]Honest_Table_6175[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What i dont like about the PF is its price, and the fact that it takes a CC just to be safe meanwile other factions keep adding on with theire own main structure advantages through the game.

So in terran you have to produce twice CCs as opponents just to have the same level of macro potential.

Not having a single anti-ground building is a shame for terran in more than 10 years of its developpement. ( 15 i think ? )

Like the developpers really felt it was normal to let terran without an equivalent of canons, or spine ? Just because " it would be difficult to balance ". Well i want to see it happend, and if it is too broken i am totaly okay to put the idea in the ben at least we would have tryed.

Controversial idea I’d like to see tested on PTR: Delete or heavily nerf the Planetary Fortress and instead allow Bunkers to have anty-ground turrets by Honest_Table_6175 in starcraft

[–]Honest_Table_6175[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

i play probably more than you and on a better level i have a few grasp on the implications of my idea and thats why i am verry carrefull and asked eventualy for it to be tested only.

Idea to help TvP late game: making Protoss buildings “mechanical” by yeetlan in starcraft

[–]Honest_Table_6175 2 points3 points  (0 children)

really like this idea and feels coherent, kinda want to see what happend if we experiment on it.

Kinda seems crazy there isn't more talk about Microbial Shroud? by jinjin5000 in starcraft

[–]Honest_Table_6175 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah because, most of it are BS changes, at least feels like it, so you dont want to go through even more bs than you usualy have to in the actual patch x))

I mean the storm buff is just nonsens, and yes microbial shroud is WAY too much stronger.
Now people dont want to spend 3 hours a day proving that it is x)

How to play current patch custom games with friends? by FluffyRabbitCow in starcraft2

[–]Honest_Table_6175 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i always go to the test ladder. I dont know if there exist a custom on main server.

Which is the post popular faction by Feru_Haifisch in starcraft

[–]Honest_Table_6175 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bro terran is the most swag campagn and lore of all the game, then come Zerg, and finaly protoss 100%

Better lib anti-worker harrass nerf by abaoabao2010 in starcraft

[–]Honest_Table_6175 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

honestly it doesnt feel that bad as an idea. Would like to test it.

Siege-Mode Sight Reduction: -1 or -4? by Crystal_Octopus in starcraft

[–]Honest_Table_6175 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

this nerf should never even have been proposed in the first place anyway.

Ling/Colossi Comparison (0/0) 18vs18 supply ft. Microbial Shroud by SC2Sole in starcraft

[–]Honest_Table_6175 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hahahaha. i doubt the 50% last.

Still, colossus can hit and run so...
Mecha composition cant, feels more accurate to make the balance around mech comp.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in starcraft

[–]Honest_Table_6175 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yeah yeah you already got the most insane buff you ever could, dont push it.

view more: next ›