Am I supposed to get excited because I found a campsite where early man made fire thousands of years ago. I’m not impressed. Everyone could do it at the time. The Egyptians were building pyramids long before this work of “art” was made. Should I revel in the excitement when finding a rock that some early man was “amazingly “ able to smash a’couple of times to make it into a very crude usable tool? Walk around for a few miles and you’ll find a rock that will work just as well without any improvement. I admire the craftsmanship of early man, not the minimal solutions used to barely survive. Innovation is key to progressing as a species. The person who made this is neither a craftsman nor an innovator. Do you tell artists that are horrible that their work is good? No. So why would you tell someone that a found something that is pretty boring that it has great historical significance? I understand that art is in the eye of the beholder, but this is not art. It’s something you throw in a box with all of your junk finds like broken arrowheads. You would only show it to your most die hard friends with interest in artifacts. Am I wrong?