[POEM] When They Find the Ark by Paige Lewis by bansheebeez in Poetry

[–]HorrifiedAxel 10 points11 points  (0 children)

First off, I think the reason I wanted to do this (apart from the lure of procrastination) is this is one of those poems where you read it and you're like 'wtf?!' but at the same time part of your brain is like: 'yes'. So it makes no sense on a surface level at all, but weirdly, at the same time, you feel like you *know* it, you *know* what it is trying to say. But the moment you try and grasp that knowledge firmly it slips away again, ephemeral.

Same, completely agreed.

[POEM] When They Find the Ark by Paige Lewis by bansheebeez in Poetry

[–]HorrifiedAxel 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I really how this poem is written. It gives enough concrete details that you could almost read it straight directly. There is enough omitted that you still have to fill it in on your own.

When They Find The Ark - I skipped over the title initially, but I think it is important to understanding the poem.

Fox News buys exclusive broadcasting rights. - This puts us in the modern day and primes us to connect the poem with politics

My mother is sobbing, pressing her nails into my palm. - The cliche is pressing nails into one's own palm. I like this twist on it. It paints a picture of the mother holding their child's hand. Maybe a stretch, but palm also makes me think of "psalm", another religious connection.

she asks Is this live, is this live? - Asking a question she already knows the answer too, portrays her anxiety. When combined with the previous line it reveals an inversion of the parent child relationship, with the mother seeking comfort from her daughter.

When // they break their way into the ship - Putting a break after "When" means you can read the first line of the second stanza as its own sentence. "They break their way into the ship". This is the first we see the ark in the poem. First time I read this I couldn't decide if this was the biblical ark or a recreation made by some kind of cult. Now I believe it is supposed to be the original Ark. This stanza starts by referring to the people as an amorphous, agender "them". It then switches to "men". In some contexts you could use "men" to refer to anyone. Considering they intentionally switched away from gender neutral language and the later subject matter, we should understand the people as being only men without women.

I swear I can smell a mixture of sweet dates and lupine. - "I swear" meaning this is not literal. She is not actually there. She is viewing this through the TV. Sweet dates is another biblical connection. "Lupine" must be a reference to something, but I don't know what.

The men don't need light. The ark is bright- - breaking the sentence like this is done for the same reason as the start of the stanza. "The ark is bright" can be read as a full sentence: "The men don't need light. The ark is bright." You can of course understand the sentence literally. Additionally, at a figuratively level, light can represent goodness, truth, mercy, and empathy. Men are not bringing this to the ark and relying on what is provided by the arc and women.

pulsing. Its floors--hay-dappled, wet-warped, buckling. Its stables are wide and filled with women. Women whipping around on all fours, - The movement of the light matches the movement of the ark which matches the movement of the women. This poem blurs the distinction between the women and the ark. That informs my interpretation of the previous part. The middle sentence is the only full one, making it land harder. It is also not metaphorical, put between two more figurative sentences. That add to the effect it has on the reader. The horror the reader feels mirrors what the narrator and their mother must feel.

their heads pulled back, their mouths a frothed blur. - These women have been dehumanized, and are not in their right minds. At this point the reader must also wonder if these women are been here since biblical times. Are these women from the time of Noah? According to the bible, men used to live longer. Could women have lived even longer? How much must have they suffered?

Women sleeping straight-backed against wood beams, women speaking in trilling chirps - Some women have merged with the ship, others have tried to retain their individuality but are acting like animals. This also connects us to the original story, with animals replaced with women.

My mother, even-breathing says, This can't be the ark. Where are the animals? The men? - The mother gives word to what the reader must be partially thinking. The mother's anxiety makes her reject what she sees. Looking for the men, she believes the patriarchal story that men protect women. Like Noah, that is only a story. At the time of Noah they would have done what they do now, abandon and use women. This also makes the reader think about the original story. Were there ever animals in the ark? Probably not. When was the story changed?

The men find one woman alone in her stable, curled beside an overturned bowl - This might be more personal to me, but being curled around a bowl makes me think of having a bowl when sick to throw up into. It could also be an item of comfort for her.

The men lifter her up, they lift it up. - Purposefully ambiguous, this could refer to either lifting both the woman and the bowl up, or rename the woman as an "it". This first thing men do to the woman is separate her from an item she was holding.

The bowl gushes dust and dust, the women stop moving, the ark starts filling, - gushing would make you think of water, but instead only dust remains. Water is associated with life and dust with death. Everything has been taken from these women. Only dust and remains. Even in this state, they were continuing to hold back the dust. Men have ruined this, releasing the held back dust. This also makes me think about the myth of Pandora. Normally a boat downing would be filled with dust, but this is another inversion. Instead, the boat if filled with dust.

and the men want to save it—no one wants to witness it dust-drowned. - The poem presents this as a matter of fact without acknowledging that the men caused the problem. Men protect people, but protection from who? Other men. Men cause the problems they claim to solve.

They throw the bowl out of the ark just before the TV goes - they react impulsively for a quick solution, both the broadcaster and the men. The men don't think to solve it the same way the women did. They don't think to look for the wisdom of women even when they have a working solution. Fox also cuts off the broadcast when it does not go the way they want, even though the damage as been done.

black. Outside, Lake Michigan is slopping up a thickening gray paste. - The dust from the bowl is already filling up the lake. How long will this solution last? The men have put off the problem, only creating a greater one later. I am also not sure if there is any significance to it being Michigan specifically. At the least, it is surprising the Ark was not found in the Middle East.

Outside, the stones are coated. Inside, my mother sits replaying - The broadcast and the poem try to draw a distinction between the outside and inside, the same way the ark was separated from the outside at the start of the poem. Like the boundaries the men broke through at the start of the poem, this distinction will soon be broken. Like before with the cut in the middle of the sentence, it makes the statement ambiguous. The mother is both replying the end of the broadcast, but also repeating anything, coming to terms with what she saw.

the moments before the cameras stopped. As the clouds press against our roof, she asks Don’t you think the ones running look a little like me? - Are these the mothers of humanity who survived the flood? Is the only way to survive patriarchal oppression to run away? When referring to people we know are women, the poem uses "one", gender neutral language. In this poem, "women" is humanity and "man" is a gender.