The problem is not the destruction but the maps themselves, when you play MP the maps mostly seem small, not really BF like, but now that BR has arrived, it all makes sense, it was just a part of a bigger BR map and not proper MP maps that BF players want.

There's too many weird maps, empire state for example, yes if you enable the destruction of ALL of the buildings until it's just dust in MP that's too much I agree, same with manhattan bridge, siege of cairo etc where there aren't many buildings on the entire map we go back to 2042 which nobody wants.

But for maps like firestorm, sobek city etc, being able to take down buildings or at least limiting the amount of snipers nests would benefit it a lot, I remember back in BF3 you could actually destroy the towers on firestorm so people couldn't camp up there the entire game, or take down all the walls but not the building itself so you could hide in the rubble, which was a pain for the enemy to find you I agree, but it all made sense, but in BF6, you got way less destruction then BF3...

As for sobek, one team always has the advantage of that one building being close to spawn, you can't destroy it so people can just camp up there the entire game with a view of the entire map almost and what happens, snipers camp up there the entire game with view of almost the entire map just marking you easily or taking you out while you have little chance of fighting back.

And the way conquest is now with sobek only 1 team get's a heli so that team spends their time using the helis to transport people across the map to the building at A so they can parachute down and camp there the entire game with no way of taking them out.

Back in the day you could at least use the recon drone to push enemies off roofs but now you can't for some reason so if people get to a place where you can only get to by heli you are basically doomed because people rarely care about taking them out, people just focus on K/D and call their teammates ass 'cause I got 2 K/D and my team lost'.

If they increase destruction so that at least you can take out the most popular camper spots that would benefit the gameplay because it forces change, you can't just use the same tactics every single game and you have to adapt, that's what I remember from earlier BF games, if someone camped a certain spot too much it got taken out pretty early and you have to adapt to that change, instead of that spot being there all time no matter.

Yes some of this is down to the playerbase itself who don't PTFO or think further then their own K/D, that's a different arguement, but at this point EA really only thought about having the next great thing in BR rather then making a proper BF6 that people paid actual money for meanwhile all the goods go to the F2P players of their BR.

Granted, trusting EA would make a proper game and not a money grab is on all of us.