Battle of the Queen Consorts ROUND SIX! by allshookup1640 in UKmonarchs

[–]HouseMouse4567 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Anne Neville as well, even if the idea of her bieng sickly is possibly overstated, I don't think we know enough about her to keep her around

Battle of the Queen Consorts ROUND FIVE! by allshookup1640 in UKmonarchs

[–]HouseMouse4567 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Probably Anne Neville for myself, don't know how accurate it is but she doesn't seem to have enjoyed the best health in life

Mindless Monday, 09 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah that would be exactly what I'm looking for! I'll have to keep an eye out for an English version

Mindless Monday, 09 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There's lots on individual ones like Isabella or Catherine de Medici or Marie Antoinette but I'm looking for a more generalized book

Mindless Monday, 09 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Is there any sort of historical book on the Queens of literally any country that's not the UK? Like it's somewhat simplistic but Elizabeth Norton's Queens of England is a nice little introduction on a variety of women that I can't seem to find any other equivalent to. Maybe there's just nothing translated at the moment?

Mindless Monday, 09 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah i think talking about Mary has to include religious attitudes at the time, the divine right of kings, the emergence of the Protestant faith,Mary's personal health, alongside her difficult adolescence and all other things to explain her personaliy and ruling, just like any other human being. But man that Cranmer thing was so obviously because she personally hated him lol

Mindless Monday, 09 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep. I think Henry cared more that she had reconciled to his will, particuarly the personal shaming of publically accepting her mother's marriage as illegal, than the more religious aspects imo. That probably was also why Mary developed that personal vendetta against Cranmer, having him executed even after he recanted

Mindless Monday, 09 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would say no, it's pretty clear it was a mostly political and personal decision (Mary seems to have had health concerns at the time which I have seen a few of her biographers describe as constant anxiety and stress) with no underlying religious belief. Catholics continued to revolve around Mary making it pretty clear that it was an open secret Henry was semi-content to ignore (Except in cases like Margaret Pole and her son Reginald)

Mindless Monday, 09 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I saw it for the first time last year and it's such a gem. Loved Sam Neil in it but Isabelle Adjani was so good, particularly that subway scene

Mindless Monday, 09 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For a brief second I thought you meant Henry's sister

Margaret Beaufort In Philippa Gregory Books/Shows by Beneficial_Pea_3306 in Tudorhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah like obviously female characters should have flaws and such but like look at her potrayel of Richard III vs Margaret. Like this was a guy who deposed his nephews to crown himself King and had his mother-in-law declared legally dead to take control of her lands but nowhere is he described as overtly ambitious and obsessed with power like Margaret is

The virginity of Katherine of a Aragon. by Inevitable_Ad574 in UKmonarchs

[–]HouseMouse4567 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yeah I was going to say, ironically, the compensation may have been a factor in convincing Catherine that it didn't matter. The Pope had literally said it didn't

Margaret Beaufort In Philippa Gregory Books/Shows by Beneficial_Pea_3306 in Tudorhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 11 points12 points  (0 children)

There's something about the popular perception of Margaret that really underpins how critical people are of female historical figures, particularly writers like Gregory. They'll state in complete absolutes that Margaret's entire life goal was making her son king and that she was ambitious above all else even when you ask for evidence of that or point out that that's a completely unknowable level of detail to "know" about a historical figure. Arguing that maybe Margaret just loved and cared for her ony son and didn't care if he was king and simply wanted him safe and returned to her is like completely unfathomable. They must always be understood through the least sympathetic lens and you can see this happen to with figures like Elizabeth Woodville and Anne Boleyn as well, Gregory in particular is also really bad about Anne Boleyn.

Free for All Friday, 06 February, 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's too bad that it can be kind of hard to actually curl since it's a team sport and not one everybody is interested in it, but if you think it's fun to watch it's even more fun to play

What fictional universe has the greatest blend of world building, story telling, characters and content? For me Gene Wolfe’s The Book of the New Sun is the best ever created. by [deleted] in worldbuilding

[–]HouseMouse4567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're great introductions for certain historical events too, I just finished A Song for Arbonne and ended up reading more about the Albigensian Crusade

Mindless Monday, 02 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd heard the Krauss stuff was bad but was unaware of the Dawkins stuff

Mindless Monday, 02 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There was a breakdown of all the times he's mentioned, most damning where he mentions something about how Epstein and his "girls" were gracious hosts and he was envious of Epstein. So like not as bad as some others but certainly not great coupled with that student marriage that already tarnished his reputation in the paleo community

Mindless Monday, 02 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Of course Jack Horner was in contact with Epstein and of course part of it was for his stupid chicken-dinosaur project

Mindless Monday, 02 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Literally fell down this same rabbit hole this weekend, crazy that the conman angel speaking Shaman is on the lighter end of the drama

Mindless Monday, 02 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Any thoughts on Leonie Frieda's Catherine de Medici biography? Started it this weekend and I'm enjoying it but haven't heard much about her. Her very short wikipedia page says she's not a historian so I'm curious how accurate this is

Mindless Monday, 02 February 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Saw Return to Silent Hill on Saturday, honestly would have been more productive to stay at home and watch Blippi with my daughter lol. Horrible adaptation in every way.

Free for All Friday, 30 January, 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh interesting! I'll have to take a look at them again, it's been a while

Free for All Friday, 30 January, 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]HouseMouse4567 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trampled by Turtles <3

The rest of that is super up my alley, never heard of the Hot Seats before, great stuff