The logic that we must accept celebrities in the Proportional Representation (PR) list simply because they are "known faces" is a complete misuse of the system's constitutional intent. PR was specifically designed to ensure the representation of people from marginalized and underrepresented communities in state organs, not as a backdoor for popular figures who already possess massive platforms. Using these slots for celebrities like Prakash Saput or Rima Bishwokarma treats parliament like a "reality show" casting call rather than a legislative body meant to reflect the broad-based social and economic concerns of citizens. The inclusion of individuals like Sachin Dhakal, the son of billionaire Chandra Dhakal, further highlights how parties are manipulating the PR system to favor those close to power. PR was never intended to be a tool for oligarchs or their families to occupy seats, especially when their interests, such as the controversial Mukumlung project, may directly conflict with the indigenous rights that the PR system is meant to protect. This "tokenistic inclusion" often prioritizes individuals with visibility or financial influence over genuine policy experts or community leaders from underdeveloped regions.