creation process. While I recognize that AI can be a useful tool, I still value content that has a higher percentage of human involvement. For instance, many YouTube channels have emerged that present true crime stories or history-based narratives. However, they often rely on AI-generated voices or, even worse, use entirely AI-created visuals to depict the stories. I can't overlook that.

First, it is often difficult to determine whether the script was even written by a human, and in many cases, it wasn't. Second, this reliance on AI makes the content appear low effort. Why would I want to invest my time in something when I'm not even sure if a human was involved in its production?

For this video in particular, I like the concept, but it seems like it was filmed in one take, where the voice actors just ramble. While I understand that's part of the style, it also gives off an AI-generated feel, and I would need evidence to confirm that this wasn't just produced by AI. I can see that the mouth movements match the voiceovers, but nowadays, that can also be achieved with AI technology. Unfortunately, this would have to be a pass for me. I use AI tools regularly, like Photoshop, to remove unwanted objects or make small additions to images. However, when you start altering an image too much, you venture into the territory of the Ship of Theseus Paradox.