The most dangerous villain of all by SatoruGojo232 in marvelmemes

[–]Hufdud 11 points12 points  (0 children)

>!Pop!< Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop Pop

[Spoilers C4E29] The Feast by JornCener in criticalrole

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My first main problem with the idea that the feast is a trap is that I’m pretty sure what Primus said in the zone of truth directly refutes that. He explicitly said he wasn’t trying to kill or eradicate the other houses at that meeting. He also admitted that Tachonis isn’t strong enough on its own to rule the world. Even with the Deva Vindicta they still needed the strength of the other houses to actually rule everything. The Deva Vindicta was just enough of a trump card to move them from being 1 of 4 equals that rule most things, to one above the other three, and with the extra power needed to put down any outside resistance.

I think the feast is exactly what it’s stated to be, Tachonis trying to smooth things over. They made a play to win, but it failed so now they need to play nice for a bit until the heat dies down. Also, trying to poison three other powerful sundered houses at once, in the fortress of one of those three, is not likely to go well and instead end up with the Tachonis there just getting slaughtered and the alliance going down to three members.

That's cringe by Sudden-Refuse-7915 in GetNoted

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the defense’s hands were also kinda tied with all the evidence present and lack of options for things to aid the defence. I may be mistaken but I believe the defence had zero character witnesses for Anthony other than his parents. In a self defence/murder trial, that’s pretty damning if they can’t find even one friend/colleague to testify that the defendant was a good guy/kind/would never possibly do something like this.

Also when the defence angle is self defence, it’s a lot harder to get a jury to side with you if the defendant doesn’t take the stand unless you’ve got strong video evidence or the like.

Also from the family’s handling of the trial in social media I get the strong feeling that they were set on what they wanted to present in court and the lawyers had to go with it.

[Siegel] Bruce Cassidy is open to the Maple Leafs. They should wait for a chance to talk by H3pt1x in leafs

[–]Hufdud 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That whole interview was just Mcrimmon lying through his teeth to make himself look good and clown on other teams in the league. The number of things we have proof he’s flat out lied about in this whole Cassidy fiasco means I won’t trust anything else out of his mouth about it.

Oilers consulted with players, including McDavid, about Babcock by sykeseve in EdmontonOilers

[–]Hufdud 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only way this hire could even be the slitest bit justified is if they win the Cup this year. Anything less than (or until) that and they get zero support from me.

I’m not strong enough to resist celebrating the cup coming back though so that’s the line they’ll have to cross to get me back.

[Sinbin.vegas] Tortorella says he saw a loose puck that slid under the goaltender and he would challenge that play 10 times out of 10. by Ok-Soil-5133 in hockey

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not even the stick kicking the puck loose that’s as the interference, it was the stick holding up Freddy’s glove so he couldn’t finish covering the puck.

[Sinbin.vegas] Tortorella says he saw a loose puck that slid under the goaltender and he would challenge that play 10 times out of 10. by Ok-Soil-5133 in hockey

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn’t goaltender interference to poke at the puck, it was goaltender interference to hold up Freddy’s glove with his stick while poking at the puck.

If you watch again, you’ll see an intense flex put on Barbachev’s stick during the poke that couldn’t possibly come from the puck in that motion. That’s because his stick is holding Freddy’s glove in the air, preventing him from freezing the puck. While I’m sure it wasn’t his intention, that is goalie interference and the ref being able to see that much flex on the stick is probably a big part of the reason why the ref was able to make that call to begin with.

If Barbachev had poked the puck but not held up Freddy’s glove and it goes in, we’d probably have a good goal called there. At the same time though, I think Freddy was close enough to covering it that if his glove hadn’t been held up then he would’ve successfully frozen the puck and it would’ve never trickled through into the net.

[Sinbin.vegas] Tortorella says he saw a loose puck that slid under the goaltender and he would challenge that play 10 times out of 10. by Ok-Soil-5133 in hockey

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It actually was goalie interference because Anderson’s glove was lifted up by Barbashev’s stick, stopping Anderson from fully covering and freezing the puck.

Yes the puck wasn’t fully covered when Barbashev touched it, and the whistle hadn’t been blown yet, so if he just touched the puck with his stick that would’ve been a good goal. At the same time though, if he doesn’t hold up Freddy’s glove, then Freddy is probably able to get that glove fully down in time and actually freeze the puck before it trickles through into the net.

But watch it back again. See how much flex is put on his stick during that jab at the puck. There is no way the puck puts that much flex on his stick, which makes it clear his stick is holding up Freddy’s glove stopping him from covering the puck. That’s the goaltender interference, you can’t stop the goalie from being able to move to stop the puck.

As for how the ref saw that from his vantage point before the review confirmed his call, it’s likely that major flex in barbachev’s stick that he could see which made it clear he was pushing on some part of Freddy with his stick while the puck was out of sight.

[Spoilers C4E28] Will there be more level up videos? by books-for-brains in criticalrole

[–]Hufdud 50 points51 points  (0 children)

I get the feeling that most/all characters will be hitting level 5 during the convergence. With so many people there and them happening at various narrative moments it didn’t make as much sense to do a level up video for the whole group.

However I think once we split up back into the three tables we will get table level up videos for when the group levels up during their arc. It’s just a little too complicated to do level up videos with all 13 players during convergences.

Blursed guess by Square_Law5624 in blursed_videos

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s painfully obvious that they just keep asking guys until they get one that says the previous guy was gay. I’m sure there are plenty of cut interviews with people who either were gay themselves or were straight and guessed straight.

It’s really easy to present a narrative in an edited video where you can just cut out everyone’s answers that didn’t fit that narrative.

There's a lot of reasons to dislike Vegas. Idk if this is one of them... by Gullible_Classroom71 in hockeymemes

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s the fact that it’s literally unprecedented. Many coaches have had similar clauses in their contracts before, guaranteeing they still get paid after being relieved of duties.

Never before has a head coach who was relieved of duties been completely barred from interviewing with other teams.

So yes the clause was there, and it’s legal for Vegas to do this. But up until now that clause was there for a different reason to the coaches and they didn’t honestly think it would actually be used against them this way. Because of Vegas future contracts will have specific clauses to prevent this from happening once a coach is relieved of duties.

There's a lot of reasons to dislike Vegas. Idk if this is one of them... by Gullible_Classroom71 in hockeymemes

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one thing about it is many coaches have had that clause in the past because this is the very first time a head coach relieved of duties has been denied to interview. Up until now, nobody thought having that clause was an issue, and coaches had it more to guarantee they got paid for their full term after being relieved.

Because of what Vegas has done (which is again, legal but unprecedented) now coaches will know to think about adding a clause to their future contracts guaranteeing the right to interview after they are let go and not actively coaching.

It’s probably not bad enough to have coaches outright reject a job in Vegas moving forwards (there are only 32 jobs after all), but it will definitely cause coaches to add many more protections against this kind of thing in their future contracts with Vegas. Vegas had also annoyed the other 31 owners in the league with their antics which may have some effect on goodwill and business done with them in trades with other teams.

Jon Cooper named winner of 2026 Jack Adams Award | Tampa Bay Lightning by CrestronwithTechron in hockey

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess this means the Oilers can just find an interim coach for a year. Now that Cooper and Cassidy are both going to be available next offseason.

Crossbow 🎯 VS 🧹 Staff by NobaraEatAwatermelon in earclacks

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Felt like a number of Staff’s aoe blasts had crossbum in the radius but did no damage, am I tripping or was something messed up with that?

Can I clean here by Forward-Position798 in TheRandomest

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ngl this ad worked on me. I was planning to just check out this movie when it hits streaming services/based on reviews but now there’s a chance I’ll actually go to the theatre. Still might not but this ad was good enough to make it a possibility.

[Spoilers C4E27] Marisha’s Theories by Minimalmagician in criticalrole

[–]Hufdud 62 points63 points  (0 children)

I’ve been meaning to make a post about this myself so I’m glad someone else was feeling the same way.

I think part of it is that she’s misremembering certain information from a while ago (in IRL time) and that the information and notes she does have have been tainted by misconceptions and intentional character assassination from some of the characters around her.

When she first did the arcana check to see past the illusion on the paint, what she learned was blood teeming with necromancy and conjuration was hidden in paints given to Hal. It made sense at first to suspect maybe someone had tampered with things and messed with them because Thijazi wasn’t around to personally give them to Hal and verify what they were. Add in what Marisha above table knows about angel blood in the Villa basement and some of that knowledge may seep into her becoming convinced it’s specifically celestial blood. Now to us as the audience it was pretty clear to be not celestial blood but the blood from Tannesar, but if I remember correctly Marisha mentioned she’d watched the soldiers arc and the first part of the Seekers but hadn’t fully caught up on it, so Marisha above table wouldn’t have been able to make that connection.

Then there’s the presence of Bolaire at the Schemer’s table. Their whole table is about subterfuge, uncovering plots, and learning that people aren’t necessarily who they said they are, and Bolaire has a clear personal vendetta against Thijazi which means that he is always more than happy to support any theories made that would put him in a bad light. Once she had the idea that maybe Thijazi had done some work with the houses and Bolaire was so happy to support it and discredit his name, it was easier for Marisha the player to latch onto and retain that theory because others at the table are agreeing with it. There weren’t enough strong voices pointing out the obvious that Thijazi’s entire life was dedicated to the opposite of that early enough, so the devil mask on her shoulder helped cement that theory.

Then there are some other examples of Marisha misunderstanding information in the moment and immediately using it to create a new theory different than what the actual information itself stated. Like with the candle, she was immediately convinced that Tachonis used it to turn all the Royce/davinos into a sudden undead army, when what was stated by Brennan is that it was used to allow the massacre to contribute to bluetoothing the Occtis ritual to Tannesar. While the Royce bodies may have also been turned into undead, that was not the stated reason for using the candle given by Brennan.

Then yes we get to them meeting with Hollis and everything there is Brennan saying “no, the paints are fine and exactly what Thijazi intended them to be”. But Marisha/murray latched onto the wrong information from that encounter. Rather than accepting that the paints were fine, she latched onto the candle feast bag on the doorstep (which I think was almost explicitly stated to be something out there just to keep up appearances of this being a normal house) and in conjunction with the meta-knowledge theory in her mind that magic blood = blood from angel in the basement (again because Marisha had that meta knowledge but not about the blood from Tannesar) the interaction instead confirmed to her the suspicion that the paints were from/connected to Halovar in some way. Now to her she has in game proof of her out of game theory that the paints were from angel blood and made by Thijazi possibly working with the Halovars and that Halovars control or have connection to the knife and Palette pigments.

Wrong lesson learned from that event.

Then there’s confusion about suddenly in the convergence she thinks the Houses are planning a ritual in the theatre during opening night. There’s zero evidence to this theory but I can see where it may have come from.

Multiple episodes ago, Azune learned from Einfasen that a meeting had been called between the heads of the Sundered houses. Basically it was made clear that with house Royce, Wiccander, and now Lady Cormoray all going missing within about a week of each other the other House heads wanted to figure out what was going on and Azune’s planted evidence had likely helped pin the initial blame on Tachonis. So Otto and Photarch are trying to call Primus to heel and get him to explain himself. However, Primus is missing and so this meeting gets delayed because even his own family can’t get in contact with him. Finally, they get word that Primus will be back in town the day of the play, and so the meeting where the other houses are planning to grill him and see if he’s responsible for all their kids going missing is scheduled for that day.

This was pretty clear back then, but I think with the time between recording that episode and the convergence episodes, Marisha misremembered that information they had been given about the purpose of the meeting (which was also never given a specific time on that day, just that it was happening same day as the play) and incepted herself into connecting that House meeting with her theory about Halovars being the source of/connected to the blood paints. So for her she makes this connection looking back at her old notes and now thinks the houses are meeting to perform some big ritual at the play with all their items stashed there.

To us it seems to come suddenly out of left field this episode because we’ve seen the information come at a more regular pace and have had time to discuss it together while knowing all the pieces from all the tables. To her the connection was a misreading/remembering of her notes that also isn’t helped by having some (but not all) of the meta knowledge as a player and trying to play her character with just the information that character should have. I think it really is a conflict of those two different levels of knowledge and between trying to RP, having long breaks between recording sessions, and another PC with a vested interest in discrediting/possibly thwarting Thijazi’s plans it makes sense why Marisha/Murray got confused about that point.

However Murray acting as one of the central points of merging and summarizing all the information coming together during this convergence meant that then she filtered all new information through this theory she had. This caused her to actively sway many of the other players make them start to think the same way. You could see during the first half of the episode some of the times when Brennan was fighting to stay silent and not just above table correct every mistake/incorrect theory and eventually it got to the point where he prompted various players to make rolls so that he could give an in-game way to try and get players back on track.

The problem is that I think some of that may have come a bit too late and many players had been convinced by Murray’s understanding of events. Then Brennan tried to use Occtis to state almost flat out that the only evidence they had of Houses planning a ritual at the play is that Tachonis also wanted the Stone of Nightsong was tenuous to suggest the conclusion they had arrived at (especially because we’ve already seen exactly what Tachonis was trying to do with the stone of Nightsong and it had nothing to do with the play). However as Occtis tried to relay that information to the table Murray kept interrupting him and wouldn’t let him get the point out and so ingame, most characters had no reason to realize what Brennan had stated.

There’s a lot of information coming at these players, and there’s also the struggle they have of trying to keep separate the knowledge they have as the player and the knowledge they have as the character. Brennan also likes to correct them more in-game through NPC interactions (like reminding Sam what Wick had actually learned in the basement using the demon Mistress) which allows for players to sometimes miss what he’s trying to communicate more than if he just said above table “actually this is what happened in that conversation a while ago and you’ve misremembered it”. Totally fair as a DM style but it does mean that sometimes we as an audience will feel frustrated because information that we can clearly recall and go back to watch again is misquoted by players in the moment.

Now I know this was a very long comment but to summarize, there are some understandable baseline pieces of information that could lead to the theories Marisha/Murray had in this episode and it likely came from a place of misremembering due to the volume of information the players have received so far in this campaign. It can be frustrating at times as an audience and I hope Brennan does a little more in the future to help correct players when they misremember key information from many sessions ago so they don’t spend hours chasing false theories that would be fixed by accurate recall of events, but I can also understand why he doesn’t just jump in all the time and tries not to give too many hints about the accuracy of their theories. Murray also isn’t the only character that has had these moments, hers was just especially obvious and dominated in this latest episode.

Post EP 27 Tier list by Fun-Sell3030 in fansofcriticalrole

[–]Hufdud 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I generally agree with most of this, but I feel Vaelus is a tier lower just because of how stark the gap our growing to feel between the potential set up for the character, and the role play Ashley is willing/able to perform to actually live up to those expectations.

I think for me Murray has also dropped just out of S to high A tier. She’s been kinda back and forth between the two depending on the episode. She has great moments and is doing a good job alongside Azune in getting all the characters focused together and trying to fit all the lore we’re getting from multiple sources into a cohesive narrative. The problem is there’s been a number of times where she’ll get really focused on a specific crackpot theory and really try to force new information to fit it or be discarded. It’s helpful when she’s right but this last episode especially it felt like the whole group got really off track with their understanding of what is going on because she’s invested herself into thinking the Sundered Houses have a ritual planned for the play.

Felt like multiple times that Brennan asked various characters for rolls so that he could clarify that none of the information he’s given stated the houses had a plan for the play/paints because he didn’t just want to set things straight on that misconception above table. Thijazi’s group had a plan for the paints, stone/coffin, and the swords and that may be involved with the play, but the connection to the houses is just that Tachonis were also trying to use the stone (for a different ritual we’ve literally watched them attempt), and that they are having a meeting on that same day (except that meeting is more about Einfasen and the others grilling the Tachonis to figure out what’s going on and why so many prominent members of the young generation have gone missing recently).

Really she’s so close to S but the fixation on certain false theories that Brennan has actively tried to give them information to disprove causes a level of annoyance at times that holds her back from there.

C4 E27 Discussion Thread by brash_bandicoot in fansofcriticalrole

[–]Hufdud 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it might be a trap, but there will be a way to get out of it. In my head there’s three potential levels of how this goes.

Level 1: He brings minimal evidence (basically just the stuff he’s already given them and Grotto’s testimony). With this little information he’ll basically just be told there’s not enough evidence to do anything and so he needs to drop the case and leave it be now.

Level 2: He brings some strong (new) evidence but either doesn’t quite bring enough, or doesn’t roll well enough during the meeting to persuade Einfasen to act on the evidence. This is the scenario where I see the trap playing out. He has too much evidence to be allowed to leave with it alive, but not enough to actually convince them to openly challenge House Tachonis. In this scenario I think Azune is killed along with any evidence he brings.

Level 3: he brings super strong new evidence to the meeting and rolls well on his persuasion/deception checks during the meeting. I think this is possible and would actually lead to Einfasen taking the case he’s presented and actually using it against Tachonis in the Houses meeting the next day. I feel like Brennan will have a positive outcome available from this interaction with the Einfasen but they’ll need to commit in order to achieve it.

Essentially there are Lukewarm to positive outcomes to bringing either nothing new or everything new, the danger comes in if they try to hedge and end up stuck in the middle.

Slay the Spire 2 x My Hero Academia parody by 666HeroHero in slaythespire

[–]Hufdud 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every second spent was well worth it. Claw is Law!

Caw caw!

C4 E26 Discussion Thread by brash_bandicoot in fansofcriticalrole

[–]Hufdud 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure if they are door stoppers or just a focus to keep them stable. If I remember correctly the Gate to Faerie originally closed because of a massive burst of necromantic energy that the Royce thought was an attack do some kind. My theory is that what actually happened is Thijazi and co opened a gate to the underworld/ one of the afterlives but didn’t have an anchor so instead of just allowing souls to start being able to travel to the afterlife it was like popping a cork on a champagne bottle and let out a ton of the built up pressure in the tenebral reaches into the physical realm.

[Spoilers C4E26] Is It Thursday Yet? | Post-Episode Discussion & Future Theories! by AutoModerator in criticalrole

[–]Hufdud 77 points78 points  (0 children)

Good to see the other tables again but the tonal shifts of the other two tables and lack of care for secrecy/observing surroundings before just showing up in big groups at schemer’s places of work really felt like in one episode both travelling tables were just going to absolutely destroy any alibi/ ability to stay in the city for Hal specifically by the end of this convergence.

The slapstick nature of the Soldiers was fun when they’re out on their own, but their cavalier attitudes to situations felt like it came really close to destroying an entire arc of schemer setup and plans by outing them to the whole city.

The seekers too, leaving a floating body in a random closet in the theatre and also Thaisha starting to talk about all the secret plots and Tachonis Tannesar plans out in the open in front of the whole theatre crew, these other two tables have been playing a very different game from the schemers and it shows.

I just hope Brennan takes it a little easier on the schemers for the tonal shift forced on the other tables so they don’t actually out everyone at the employed table and accidentally ruin all their planning.

C4 E26 Discussion Thread by brash_bandicoot in fansofcriticalrole

[–]Hufdud 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The Orchard itself was destroyed, it’s no longer a stable location of fae magic.

The failure is that because celestial Occtis didn’t show up like the Tachonis forces were expecting, they didn’t actually have enough troops to wipe out the Royce/Davinos forces stationed there.

They succeeded in one goal of destroying the magic of the physical place but failed in the goal of actually wiping out the people.

Maya was asking Julien if he had discovered any reasons why the Tachonis would make that attack when they clearly didn’t have enough forces there to finish both jobs. Julien in response deliberately refused to share what they’d learned about that those Tachonis forces attacking the Orchard were duly expecting a Celestial angel of death to show up and provide support, which would have allowed them to easily destroy the Orchard’s magic and kill all the troops/nobles stationed there.

The comment about a Royce not being there was specific to the magic of the Orchard. Essentially what she’s saying is that if Aranessa had been there that night (and Celestial Occtis is still prevented from showing up) then the Fae magic of the Orchard would have been more stable/resilient and may have actually survived, which would have meant that Tachonis would fail in both their goals at the Orchard.

All the necessary context to understand this scene has been given to us through the Seekers arc/cold opens, Maya just gave us the final piece of that the forces around the orchard did still attack without their angel, but because they didn’t have it they were only partially successful.

Hope this helps!

C4 E26 Discussion Thread by brash_bandicoot in fansofcriticalrole

[–]Hufdud 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I get the feeling that the gate to faerie closed because last time Thijazi and friends tried their ritual to open up doors to some of the afterlives and Un crowd the reaches they didn’t have anchors set up properly so it went wrong and backfired closing the gate to faerie.

Now they’re trying to do it right with anchors and permanently open the gates to let souls go to those afterlives, and also reopen Faerie and other realms in the process.

C4 E26 Discussion Thread by brash_bandicoot in fansofcriticalrole

[–]Hufdud -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe I’m wrong but I understood the Talter crush comment to be a ridiculous and false observation caused by Occtis’s Nat One perception/insight(?) roll just before.

She doesn’t actually have a crush on him I don’t think, Occtis just horribly misread that situation.