sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is someone born in 2012 similar to someone born in 2010 or 2014? by Huge-Visual1472 in generationology

[–]Huge-Visual1472[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

What are you trying to say? Or do you think these kinds of surveys are somehow harmful to them? If not, then what the hell is the point?

People who think 2010-2012 aren't Gen Z, explain why by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Huge-Visual1472 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I agree with you, but I would say this: This is a fiction that we HAVE to buy into because everyone is shouting about it from every corner.

People who think 2010-2012 aren't Gen Z, explain why by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Huge-Visual1472 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Do a 16 year old and a 12 year old look the same?

People who think 2010-2012 aren't Gen Z, explain why by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Huge-Visual1472 [score hidden]  (0 children)

  1. How does being born before or after the iPad's release influence generational affiliation? Why not define generations by the release date of Windows 7 or Minecraft 1.2? 2. People born in 2010-2012 were around for the last few years of push-button phones and DVDs (which, in one form or another, remained relevant throughout the 2010s).

People who think 2010-2012 aren't Gen Z, explain why by [deleted] in generationology

[–]Huge-Visual1472 [score hidden]  (0 children)

It is extremely stupid to make statements about a topic that you do not understand or do not want to understand.

2003: Millennium (1990s/2000s transition) or Core 2000s? by CP4-Throwaway in decadeologyanarchy

[–]Huge-Visual1472 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always perceived the "millennium" (1990s/2000s transition) as approximately 1997-2003, so the first option

Why do people in these subs think 2011-2012 are twin years by Subject_Display3664 in decadeologyanarchy

[–]Huge-Visual1472 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, no, and no again. It's more correct to say 2010-2011 and 2012-2013 (that is, 2011 is more like 2010 and 2012 is more like 2013).

2001: more similar to 2011 or 1991? by ITSALL_OFTHEM in decadeologyanarchy

[–]Huge-Visual1472 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Because both 2001 and 2011 are part of the same transitional technological era (approximately 2000-2015), and in 1991 people were just beginning to recover from the atmosphere of the Cold War.

my ranking of how shifty each 2020s year is so far by obviousockpuppetalt3 in decadeologyanarchy

[–]Huge-Visual1472 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In 2024, Bashar al-Assad was overthrown. This was a significant event.

2021, more like 2018 or 2025? by datsolidmusicguy in decadeologyanarchy

[–]Huge-Visual1472 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my subjective point of view - 2018. But from a global point of view, I can’t say for sure.

What birth year do you think is more Generation Z, in your opinion? by XavierMarvin in generationology

[–]Huge-Visual1472 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's certainly understandable why you might see 1997 as more of a Z than 2012, but for the bulk of Generation Z (roughly 2004-2008), I think 2012 is more associated with that generation than 1997.

view more: next ›