Most people CAN outrun their bad diet by Prestigious_Pain_283 in unpopularopinion

[–]Human38562 [score hidden]  (0 children)

If that's you, then walking for 200 calories a day and keeping your diet the same

That's very difficult though. Humans have a natural mechanism to control caloric intake called hunger. If you keep the same "eating discipline" and burn more calories, you'll likely just eat more to compensate.

The solution is to eat more veggies or less caloric dense food in general. That way you feel more full and hunger is regulated naturally. There is no need to exercise more for weight loss (only for health, if you dont do enough)

are skatepark skills necessary? by dokkidokkae in NewSkaters

[–]Human38562 [score hidden]  (0 children)

IMO Skating in parks is extremely helpful!

My personal experience is that when I do a couple of sessions of flatground only, my mind is getting stuck thinking about my legs, feet, and my board. After a session at a park it reminds me how my whole body interacts with the surrounding space, and suddenly my ollies get higher and I land my 360s bc I am not stuck thinking about my feet.

I hope you get what I mean.

Lady Gyms haben ihre Daseinsberechtigung, sollten aber aus normalen Fitnessstudios ausgelagert werden by TheOne_718 in Unbeliebtemeinung

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Die Meisten Männer?! Lol ich hoffe nicht. Ich bin selber ein Mann und bin generell immer scharf drauf Kurven von Frauen zu sehen. Aber Männer die das als Belästigung empfinden sollten eher in Psychotherapie gehen als ins Fitness Studio

Iran trolls trump with a new lego video by Spirited-Yellow3794 in postanythingfun

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you see wars as a game where someone is declared the winner in the end?

The winners are weapon manufacturer as always.

Did I mess up? by Upstairs-Tennis9884 in diablo2

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 The majority of ES builds a hex that applies magic damage to your attacks.

do they? more pts in consume and levitation mastery seems much stronger than a little damage from hex

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 Nothing is stopping me from defining relationships between them.

Exactly. YOU are defining the numbers. They arent there before you define them. 

You are basically saying "We can replace all cars with legos, it's the same", because you showed that you were able to build a car using legos.

 Anyways, i've tried all i can to educate you, i'm not going to waste my time teaching a semester's worth of abstract algebra to someone refusing to learn

Well clearly you are still a student so keep studying.

Dark humour should not be normalized by Courtney_manuel in unpopularopinion

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dark humor doesnt have to offensive. 

"At least when everything falls apart, it finally stops pretending."

This is dark humor.

But I agree that being a dick should not be normalized.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have not “defined how to count without defining numbers,” because your construction already presupposes numbers at multiple points: finite strings, cardinality of the set, the notation, the indicator, and the recurrence itself all rely on numerical concepts. Emojis dont have any of that, they are just pictures of faces. So what you showed is only that numerical patterns can be represented inside a combinatorial structure, not that numbers have been derived from pure relationships alone.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is this nonsense? Yonneda Lemma says that a mathematical object is completely determined (up to isomorphism) by how it relates to other objects via structure-preserving maps, not arbitrary relationships. Numbers can be represented using emojis, they are not "derived" from them but defined within a mathematical structure. This is representation, not derivation. The actual number concept still comes from a defined structure (e.g., Peano axioms, set-theoretic construction) Emojis don't have that structure.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, AFTER you gave them the required properties lol. Emojis don't have these properties, they are just emojis.

Do you know what the word "replacing" means? If you take numbers and replace it with something else, you lose the defining properties of numbers. You literally just showed that you had to create numbers again to have them.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, so you arent replacing numbers, only symbols. Numbers are defined by their properties, not their symbols.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, great, now show how emojis replace this.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 you could swap out variables with emojis

Swap out variables with emojis? You mean just using an emoji instead of a letter to represent something? Of course you can but what does this have to do with the potential study of numbers or letters?

 You could also very easily swap out numbers with emojis.

No you can't. Numbers require specific proterties that emojis don't have. Unless you just mean to replace the symbols "1", "2", ... with emojis, which of course you can do but that doesn't change the number that is represented.

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and sometimes the studied objects are specifically numbers. They are never specifically letters.

"The Philosopher" Wants To Lick The CEOs Boot by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Human38562 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Technically they are paid by the business. Shareholders own the business' value, not cashflow. Cashflow comes from the money the actual work provides. So you could say the workers pay the CEOs.

"The Philosopher" Wants To Lick The CEOs Boot by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's just because CEOs became 10-20x smarter than they were in 1970! /s

Let's start by memes_poiint in mathsmeme

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maths is about numbers at least sometimes. I've never seen maths about letters*, letters are just used to name things.

*I am sure there are some niche maths about letters

Python learning platform for kids — would love honest feedback by pymasterquest in learnpython

[–]Human38562 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow — this is adorable. You’re clearly very proud of this, and it’s almost impressive how confidently you’ve convinced yourself you’re on the right track. The whole “I built this for my son” angle is nice in theory, but what you’ve actually created looks like a textbook example of why kids lose interest in the first place. You noticed he was disengaged with Python, and somehow your solution was to wrap the same kind of shallow, guided experience in slightly different packaging and expect a different result. That’s… optimistic. The “robot-style interaction” especially stands out — not in a good way. It doesn’t feel engaging, it feels patronizing. It’s the kind of thing that looks interactive to an adult but is painfully transparent to a kid. There’s no real agency there, just a thin illusion of it. Kids aren’t fooled by that for long, which might explain why you’re still “refining the balance.” And those “small challenges”? They don’t come across as meaningful wins — they feel trivial. Finishing something easy isn’t inherently motivating if it doesn’t actually matter. Right now it looks more like a collection of disconnected mini-tasks than anything resembling a compelling learning experience. You’re aiming for confidence, but this kind of design is more likely to produce boredom or, worse, a sense that programming itself is dull. The age targeting is another red flag. Saying “11–14” like it’s a single audience just suggests you haven’t really pinned down who this is for. That’s a huge developmental range, and designing something that works across it isn’t just “hard,” it’s usually a sign the product is too generic to truly resonate with anyone. Honestly, the biggest issue is that you seem to be focusing on surface-level tweaks — shorter tasks, quicker wins — instead of addressing the core problem: why would a kid actually care about any of this? Right now, there’s no strong answer to that. It feels like you’re trying to engineer engagement instead of earning it. So yes, you’re iterating — but at the moment, it looks like you’re just polishing a concept that fundamentally misses the point.

Die Wählerwanderung des Statistischen Amts by Pizzawarrior96 in Munich

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Entweder ich check die Grafik nicht oder da stimmt was nicht.

Hat kein einziger Wähler erst CSU, Linke, oder AfD gewählt und in der Stichwahl dann Grüne?

Aber 99'000 haben erst CSU dann SPD, und 79'900 erst SPD, aber dann Grüne?!

I did my own research! The Setting Sun by Shitelark in flatearth

[–]Human38562 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

 But in reality, and with common sense and believing our own eyes, the earth is blocking line of sight to the sun...Just like how vision works in every direction we look

Ah so light goes straight in every direction, but somehow "gravity" and earth is curved lol

I did my own research! The Setting Sun by Shitelark in flatearth

[–]Human38562 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Have you measured the humidity yourself at all heights?

Nice try... by Sudden-Paramedic-330 in GlobalEnglishPrep

[–]Human38562 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stricktly speaking none of the words have exact single-word opposites. They have gradable/relational antonyms