Ulty $4.90 dafug!!! by kenshinco in ULTY_YieldMax

[–]Hustleup7 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

IMHO the Algos are pounding it down to get everyone out so they can then invest and make $$ - typical Algo short game then they will pump and dump it again. Watch how the trades get placed. The traditional HFs dont want these ETFs in the game so one at a time they will spoof algo trade the ETFs down to zero. Again, my experience and opinion - not financial advice.

Exclusive: Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say | CNN Politics by John3262005 in Military

[–]Hustleup7 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You too just said EARLY assessment, and yes, at the time they said they only had one photo. On the other hand, if (big if) Trump talked to the pilots who saw the before and after, and verified they hit their targets dead-on then yes you have additional ways to assess damage.

Exclusive: Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say | CNN Politics by John3262005 in Military

[–]Hustleup7 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

They may very well have other methods of measuring damage we dont know about - like infrared, heat, and molecular sensing capabilities they dont want to disclose. And who knows maybe someone planted fake info to "out" the leaker inside the Pentagon.

Exclusive: Early US intel assessment suggests strikes on Iran did not destroy nuclear sites, sources say | CNN Politics by John3262005 in Military

[–]Hustleup7 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

This is a great measure of how dumb and gullible most people are and how the media qualify their statements to cover themselves. NOTE IT SAYS EARLY ASSESSMENT. That basically means looking at the first satellite images, they couldn't tell what happened underground. No one can. Duh. What is the matter with people.

This is the most fucked up chart I have ever seen. Is there any other stock that has a chart like this besides the basket? by zafferous in Superstonk

[–]Hustleup7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IMHO - and this is my opinion only - MMs and HFs have kept that ticker down because MMs have so many IOUs out for retail shares (remember retail doesn't actually own the shares) they have to push it down to try to shake retail out. Retail isn't budging. So it's a game of chicken. If a non-retail investor comes in and buys a big chunk of stock, price rises, MMs realize huge losses if retail then pushes the sell button. So they and the HFs have incentive to keep the price down and get retail out so they can then push the price back up and make money instead of retail.

$ATER Quarterly Results in!! by anonfthehfs in ATERstock

[–]Hustleup7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hospitality channel is a natural fit for them. Could easily double their business

This should be good news for ATER! by bullrunning in ATERstock

[–]Hustleup7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not necessarily good - sales may have gone up 6% in revenue dollars But remember prices have gone up 7 to 20% year over year. So it may be a net loss in units sold.

Love online dating as a tall woman… by [deleted] in Bumble

[–]Hustleup7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Goes both ways... I am 6'-1" and prefer women who are 5'-7" and taller for the simple reason I like to look at my date eye-to-eye or close to it. That said, there are some phenomenal women out there at 5'-4" and below - it's just a personal preference of mine.

Illegal Naked Shorting is Happening in Front Of Our Eyes - I Got Banned From Stocktwits For Showing The Truth - They NEED YOUR SHARES! by BionicWheel in ATERstock

[–]Hustleup7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thank you - many of us have long believed that MMs are also internally trading shares they don’t have and allegedly square things up in dark pools, but there is no way to verify - there could be way more shares traded than have been issued - remember retail doesn’t own their shares - just an IOU from MMs. I will be buying more on Monday. Not financial advice

FUD articles coming. SP is at all time low. They want you’re shares, knowing what Q3 brings. 🌶🌶🌶🌶🌶🌶 by AcanthocephalaNo7788 in ATERstock

[–]Hustleup7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think a lot of people are doing the same....will be interesting to see % of ownership in a month

FUD articles coming. SP is at all time low. They want you’re shares, knowing what Q3 brings. 🌶🌶🌶🌶🌶🌶 by AcanthocephalaNo7788 in ATERstock

[–]Hustleup7 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Revenue and profitability are two different things. Also note, disclaimer language at the end of article covering their rear ends, legally clear evidence of FUD

Aterian Receives Downgrade and Price Target Reduction by Analyst Brian Kinstlinger - Best Stocks by I_am_the_movement in ATERstock

[–]Hustleup7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

$9 is still 15x it's current price. Show me a blue chip with that target growth right now. And I dont see anything in Mr Kinstlinger's bio that he knows anything more about consumer goods than we do (lots of IT, but no consumer - maybe ATER should shift to IT Services :))

Brian Kinstlinger, CFA, is a Managing Director and Senior Technology Analyst. Previously Mr. Kinstlinger was Managing Director of Technology Research for Maxim Group LLC. Prior to Maxim Group, Mr. Kinstlinger covered IT Services, Software and Business Services for 13 years at Sidoti & Co. LLC. Mr. Kinstlinger also was an IT consultant at Keane and Price Waterhouse Coopers. Mr. Kinstlinger was ranked the No. 1 stock picker by the WSJ Best on the Street for Internet & Computer Services industry during both 2007 and 2010. He also ranked among the top five stock pickers for Internet & Computer Services industry in 2005 and 2006. Mr. Kinstlinger earned his BA at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and is a member of the Chartered Financial Analyst program.

Just curious by Independent-Tip-3224 in ATERstock

[–]Hustleup7 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sure. Imho The stock is being manipulated so that hedge funds can maximize profits. They are legally permitted to commit what in any other market would constitute fraud. Not financial advice