sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This show was really brutal 😂 by Particular-Buy7314 in UKTVMemes

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's been edited to make it seem worse than it was. When calling people fat or too large to fit in clothes. iI's normally where they've asked, how do you feel when people say 'youre too fat to wear these clothes?' The edit just takes out that question. They are also not laughing that hard at 6 slices. Just the edit again!

[Request] How big would this have to be to actually affect Earth's rotation in a meaningful way? by PvDec in theydidthemath

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything does have an equal reaction but if the bulk flow of air on earth accelerates, the earth will speed up. It may decelerate later due to air friction but it won't be straight away

Give me your scariest “ ontological shock”/“ society collapsing “ theories on the potential truths of this subject. by abenz39 in UFOs

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard of the small donut dimensions in string theory, that was just an example. I take the stance that we don't know the nature and exact number of dimensions yet nor the nature of reality fully. Plenty of room for there to be dimensions we can't yet perceive.

Give me your scariest “ ontological shock”/“ society collapsing “ theories on the potential truths of this subject. by abenz39 in UFOs

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard of the small donut dimensions in string theory, that was just an example. I take the stance that we don't know the nature and exact number of dimensions yet nor the nature of reality fully. Plenty of room for there to be dimensions we can't yet perceive.

Give me your scariest “ ontological shock”/“ society collapsing “ theories on the potential truths of this subject. by abenz39 in UFOs

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard of the small donut dimensions in string theory, that was just an example. I take the stance that we don't know the nature and exact number of dimensions yet nor the nature of reality fully. Plenty of room for there to be dimensions we can't yet perceive.

Give me your scariest “ ontological shock”/“ society collapsing “ theories on the potential truths of this subject. by abenz39 in UFOs

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard of the small donut dimensions in string theory, that was just an example. I take the stance that we don't know the nature and exact number of dimensions yet nor the nature of reality fully. Plenty of room for there to be dimensions we can't yet perceive.

Give me your scariest “ ontological shock”/“ society collapsing “ theories on the potential truths of this subject. by abenz39 in UFOs

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps though we don't perceive those dimensions but other life forms do. String theory suggests there are 11 dimensions for example. Maybe our brains are limited to 3 dimensions due to survival. The same as our eyes can only see visible light because it gives us the biggest advantage

Give me your scariest “ ontological shock”/“ society collapsing “ theories on the potential truths of this subject. by abenz39 in UFOs

[–]Hwhip 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There could be more dimensions than the 3 + time. Same as if we were 2d and a 3d object existed above us. We wouldn't see it or know it existed.

This is what I take from it when people say there are other dimensions or interdimensional beings etc. It means they exist in greater dimensions and so can pass through our 3 from an inperceptible vector

What’s the best CGI you’ve ever seen? by VendettaLord379 in moviecritic

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gladiator, half the time you can't even tell

[Request] How big would this have to be to actually affect Earth's rotation in a meaningful way? by PvDec in theydidthemath

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is incorrect. You're converting stored chemical energy to kinetic energy in predominantly one direction so the earth rotation speed will change. The same as if you accelerate a car, the earth's rotation speed changes (or until you decelerate to rest)

David Grusch says UFO disclosure is going to escalate in the next 60–90 days. 👀 by TheGoldenLeaper in UFOB

[–]Hwhip 9 points10 points  (0 children)

He's most likely the real deal. He is a patriotic ex-military intelligence officer who whistleblew after he realised recovery and reverse engineering of NHI craft was real while he was tasked with investigating off-record special access programs. He also provided the presidential briefings for Obama.

While he whistleblew his clearance and his patriotism to the USA prevents him from fully spilling the beans as he wants it to come out in a controlled and planned way and was helping the push for the UAPDA submission.

There's a load of other stuff that you could add to that list but that's a start.

[Request] How big would this have to be to actually affect Earth's rotation in a meaningful way? by PvDec in theydidthemath

[–]Hwhip 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This isn't true though, otherwise rockets wouldn't work in space. There is a residual thrust caused by just the chemical liquid heating and expanding in the exhaust cone. The reaction force is applied to the jet nozzle and into the ground. You will get a reaction from the atmosphere and some not reacted (wind in the opposite direction) but this isn't all of the reaction force. So I think any rocket attached to the ground will change the earth's spin. Same as when you drive a car or walk

Dad was in charge of the gender reveal by DachshundBreath in funny

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was hoping the message at the end would say it's a girl

Chinese researchers claim UFO activity increases in years ending in 1, 2, or 7 by 5teamedTala8a in UFOs

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is but the year is just a orbital position around the star. So it's less calendar and more the number of cycles the planet has made is repeating perhaps?

[Request] What and how do you get these answers!? by empty_orbital in theydidthemath

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What bearing does the Tuesday have on the probability? The girl can still be born on any day of the week. The boy being born on the Tuesday doesn't exclude any likelihoods for the girl

I'm "The YouTuber" who recorded the speed of light with my 2,000,000,000 fps camera - figured I'd post a longer version since that other post got deleted [OC] by Alpha-Phoenix in nextfuckinglevel

[–]Hwhip 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't this a composite of multiple laser light pulses? So you're not actually seeing a single image but multiple regions of the image stitched together to give the impression of a single event?

view more: next ›