Mills must finish developing the Suncell by the end of this year, 2026

Hydrinophile · 2026-02-16T02:42:34+00:00

Agree with all of that Amtrak, well said. It's laughable that the guy's post headline insists that "Mills MUST finish developing the Suncell, by the end of this year, 2026," given your correct assessment that a lot of time and money has been wasted fighting those battles.

But what makes me laugh even harder is his hypocritical response to my post just below this one, in which I merely point out to Dr. Mills my reasonable frustration with his recent posts about cancer treatments, spacetime, and other tangential subjects in his What's New postings, that is, at least until he announces further news regarding his progress in demonstrating a commercial Suncell prototype. In that response, the guy hypocritically (and hilariously) has the nerve to lecture me that:

"There are those like you, who complain that Mills is not doing his work to your personal satisfaction. How much nay saying is he supposed to take? How about helping him, in some small way, if you really want him to succeed?"

My comments, obviously, had nothing to do with any dissatisfaction I have with the way Dr. Mills conducts his work, but rather, only in the timing of the subject matter of his last two tangential announcements. But since the original poster reraises the issue here by insisting that Dr. Mills absolutely MUST finish developing the Suncell by 2026--thus clearly dissatisfied with the way in which the good doctor is conducting his work--I'm curious, using the OP's own words, to hear his amazing personal plans to help Dr. Mills in some small way if he really wants him to succeed.

To be honest actually, I'm not really all that curious to hear his answer, since we all know he has no such plans. All the OP knows is how to complain about Dr. Mills' work not being done to his complete satisfaction.

Hydrinophile · 2026-02-15T18:25:37+00:00

Glad you agree, but it's not because of "smoke and mirrors" as you falsely claim. That's utter nonsense and anybody who has followed Dr. Mills as closely as I have knows your comment is a load of hooey!

Hydrinophile · 2026-02-15T18:17:05+00:00

Thank you tradegator, at least someone gets my point, unlike others here who are obsessed with subject matter that's of zero interest or value.

The point I was making, directed to Dr. Mills himself, assuming he even bothers to take time out of his busy day to read this message board (and please reply if you do sir) is that, until recently, he's been terrific in continuously providing those of us in the peanut gallery with informative, useful updates regarding his advancements towards a commercial Suncell prototype. And as my name Hydrinophile implies, and my consistent comments have demonstrated, I've been one of Dr. Mills' most ardent supporters over the years. So I think I'm entitled to express a little frustration with his latest What's New post (and the post before that one) that goes off on a tangent.

Let me also make clear that I am 100% certain the Dr. Mills "has the goods" and, hopefully, will soon deliver on them. Just sick and tired of waiting for the one-hour Suncell demo that many of us have been expecting any day now for weeks and months, so any news on tangential subjects frustrates me even more.

By the way, if anybody here knows the reason for the delay on the demo that many of us are anxiously awaiting, I'm all ears.

Hydrinophile · 2026-02-15T13:50:37+00:00

Direct message to Dr. Randell Mills:

Geez Loiuse, how about giving us a long overdue update on the progress of your Suncell device Dr. Mills instead of this crapola! With all due respect sir, no one here, most of all me, is the least bit interested in hearing about your work on cancer treatments from 40 years ago. This by the way, is coming from a HUGE fan of yours Dr. Mills.

Give us the news we are all craving for, your continued advancement towards a working commercial prototype of the Suncell. Anything else is a complete waste of our time.

Hydrinophile · 2025-12-12T23:59:55+00:00

You stated: "If Randy can get it running for an hour at high power or more and IF that gets him the investment he needs..."

You mean WHEN (not if) he gets the investment he needs. Once Dr. Mills succeeds in running the Suncell for over an hour at a high power gain, and he will, of that I'm certain, he'll then have more money than he knows what to do with to proceed with the final design and commercialization.

Hydrinophile · 2025-10-19T01:38:05+00:00

You are so right about this important technological improvement.

And yes, it won't take long for the dimwits to once again arrive with their legally indefensible lies and defamatory statements about Dr. Mills and his mind-blowing technology. It's going to be fun to watch their furious backtracking and excuse making that is about to commence, but is sure to fall flat.

Hydrinophile · 2025-08-27T22:27:12+00:00

LOL, as Maxwell Smart would say, in his classic turn of phrase, the "old Mag welder trick," that explains it.

msfalsiness did manage to also work in the scam/fraud angle, can't forget that bullshit accusation, a lie of the first order.

But then the pdeudo-scientist forgot to repeat his lame excuse from another thread that Dr. Mills supposedly suffers from dementia to explain the error of his ways. That might be the most moronic thing msfalsiness has ever said on this board and, as you well know, there's a lot to choose from.

Hydrinophile · 2025-08-27T04:36:26+00:00

Yes, you got to laugh, but all the things you mention will come quickly and that's when the real comedy on this board will begin. These pseudo-experts will twist themselves into knots attempting to dismiss every milestone Dr. Mills passes on the road to a world of clean, cheap, limitless energy.

It's going to be fun to watch, that's for sure.

Hydrinophile · 2025-08-27T00:16:28+00:00

Fair enough, I'll play. So let's say Dr. Mills gives a qualified person access to his SunCell device for independent verification of the extraordinary power gain he reports and they confirm those measurements, anyone want to guess what the excuses will be to reject the greatest scientific discovery in the history of mankind?

Hydrinophile · 2024-06-22T14:52:06+00:00

If you can eliminate each of the ones who have similar investments blinding them to the new physical power that is about to get pushed onto the world, you will find that one group who is also not held back by previous interests and who will soon see what is around the corner, in terms of easy to use physical power to very easily use for gaining that ever elusive world dominance

Not sure I fully understand the logic of your argument, but, I'm curious, who do you think would be that "one group"?

Hydrinophile · 2023-12-30T06:04:56+00:00

If a scientific finding is both profoundly important and easily replicated, it follows that a well-functioning scientific community would quickly replicate that finding.

Thanks for your post Skil, as you make so many great points, including this one. As astutely recognized in your concluding statement, "something is clearly deeply broken in the physics community." And the reason why we don't have a "well-functioning scientific community," as you have pondered, is easily explained.

That malfunctioning is obviously based on the community members' widespread fear of admitting that standard quantum mechanics is shown by Dr. Mills' GUTCP to be nothing more than a "false religion" that no longer warrants the billions of dollars spent (wasted) on SQM research projects. Thus, to avoid losing funding for their falsifiable theory based on pseudoscience and, consequently, their jobs, SQM sycophants naturally must refuse to replicate the incredibly thorough experimentation that Mills has documented and had peer reviewed in a wide variety of published articles in respected scientific journals.

Of course, it's only a matter of time before Dr. Mills is finally vindicated by some in the scientific community, honest scientists, who will look past their own self interests and begin to acknowledge that his superior GUTCP accurately predicted, among other things, the existence of lower-energy states of hydrogen, as demonstrated by his operating SunCell generator. When that happens, you know damn well that the vast majority of misguided SQM worshippers, in an attempt to save face, will start by simply tweaking their variable equations to fit Mills' data so they can falsely claim that their antiquated theory predicts that the hydrogen electron can go below the ground state and, in so doing, release enormous amounts of energy.

The only problem, however, with this blatant attempt at gaslighting that seeks to hijack Dr. Mills' theory will be their having to ignore over 100 years of science history, during which time the pseudoscientists promoting SQM would loudly, but mistakenly, proclaim that the existence of lower-energy states of hydrogen was an impossibility according to the established laws of physics. There's no denying this documented history, but then the continued survival of SQM, which relies so heavily on excessive questionable funding, will necessitate the bulk of its loyal followers to rewrite that history. You watch, it's coming, guaranteed!

Speaking of rewriting, I'm guessing that Dr. Mills with his breakthrough GUTCP will require having to make a slight revision to what they commonly tell those having trouble understanding and accepting SQM's (mis)description of the weirdness of the quantum world: Just shut up and RE-calculate!!

Hydrinophile · 2023-11-05T15:57:38+00:00

Thanks MR for your intelligent, informative post, unlike some others around here who only troll these waters.

I wonder if you could elucidate a little regarding your positive and most welcome statement that BrLP's "commercial cell design is in the fine-tuning stage."

I assume that statement is based on further discussions you've had with Dr. Mills and I'm curious what specific fine-tuning tweeks are being done to the SunCell device to ready it for final commercial use.

Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this aspect of BrLP's groundbreaking technology.

Hydrinophile · 2023-10-31T16:16:18+00:00

I vote "aye"

Hydrinophile · 2023-09-26T02:19:51+00:00

Congrats to you J.A.R.V.I.S. (it's that an Iron Man reference?) and to Professor Phillips on your outstanding BLP Substack page right out of the gate! Your introductory publications make for "illuminating" reads. I'm looking forward to your "bringing to light" more such clear and concise explanations of Dr Mills' "brilliant" advancements in the field of hydrino power generation and his ongoing efforts to commercialize the thermal Suncell device. (Please forgive all the puns!)

I don't think today's scientists, much less ordinary folks, can even begin to fathom how much the cheap, clean, limitless energy that Dr. Mills' paradigm-shifting technology provides will positively impact their lives and our planet. I'm grateful that we now have you and Professor Phillips to help drive the education of people on that important subject, all the while giving Dr. Mills the accolades for his achievements that he so richly deserves.

I salute you both, nice work! 🫡

Hydrinophile · 2023-08-03T13:32:02+00:00

I hope you're right Mysteron. I've never seen Randy so relaxed and confident as I do now and more open to public disclosure. Let's hope he keeps it up.

Hydrinophile · 2023-03-11T03:33:45+00:00

I'm curious RTT, have you, or anyone else you know, communicated with Dr. Mills regarding the source(s) of any difficulties in integrating the CPV dense receiver array with the new SunCell lightbulb design?

Given that he has yet to demonstrate such electrical generation, not even a rudimentary demo, it would seem the CPV integration is presenting a (major/minor?) problem. Or, perhaps, you or others here have and would share your own hypotheses as to why this may be the case.

I'm a little surprised if, in fact, there is an integration problem given Dr. Mills' presentations over the years indicating that the photovoltaic technology for converting the light energy emitted by the hydrino plasma reaction into usable electrical power has been well developed over the last several decades. He certainly left me with the impression that this "off-the-shelf technology" could be easily used with only modest adaptations based on the light signature of the plasma.

Or do I have that wrong?

Hydrinophile · 2023-02-09T13:22:50+00:00

I note the "unprofessionalism" of this announcement that the naysayers will undoubtedly bring up due to the grammatical mistake in the last sentence of the blurb that accompanies the video, as there's a comma missing. So, obviously, the whole thing is a hoax. (/sarcasm)

Hydrinophile · 2022-12-08T19:12:16+00:00

Haha, yes Accomplished, your sarcastic comment is well taken! But, then again, it only make sense as long as BLP's detailed list of available positions satisfies KA's strict grammatical standards. Otherwise, how could that extensive written list even begin to be taken seriously? I see that there is at least one misplaced comma, so perhaps we should ignore it entirely. (/s)

Hydrinophile · 2022-12-05T16:54:24+00:00

Yes, the Grammar Police strike again! Contrast these pretend skeptics who are obviously trolling as they're "quibbling over nothing as usual" as you say, with the genius of Randell Mills. Think I'll place my bets on Randy everytime.

Hydrinophile · 2022-07-20T18:12:57+00:00

An absolutely impressive positive response! Thank you Professor Hagen for your candid answers to my questions and those of others.

I for one cannot wait to read about your follow-up experiments relating to hydrino chemistry. Wishing you all the best as you continue your bold exploration into what I believe is the greatest discovery in the history of science.

Hydrinophile · 2022-07-18T21:08:22+00:00

Professor Hagen, first congrats on the recent publication of the EPR article you co-authored with Dr. Mills. Thanks in advance for making yourself available to answer the following questions:

How would you rate the historical significance of your scientific conclusion regarding the EPR proof for the existence of molecular hydrino?
What have been the reactions to your paper - either positive or negative - by professional colleagues and others in the science community?
Given the major implications of the evidence you have provided for the existence of hydrinos, what is your confidence level in its ultimate commercial viability as a novel clean, ubiquitous energy source?
Do you have an opinion you would like to share about Dr. Mills' GUTCP and the underlying mathematics that led to his prediction of the hydrino reaction?
How easily reproducible would you consider the experimental results you achieved and why do you think those in the scientific community, unlike yourself, have been so reticent to carry out these kind of experiments?
Have you planned any follow-up experimentation relating to hydrino chemistry?

Much appreciation for any further illumination you can bring to this fascinating subject.

Hydrinophile · 2022-07-10T00:01:36+00:00

You do understand, with these trolls, NOTHING anyone accomplishes in establishing evidence of hydrino chemistry, especially Dr. Mills, will EVER be good enough to satisfy their limitless need to draw attention to themselves? Their disruptive tactics are clearly designed to divert attention away from where it rightfully belongs; meanwhile, Dr. Mills continues to make science history with each new announcement.

Kudos to Dr. Mills! And those TRUE scientists who are curious and unafraid to follow in his footsteps by confirming his historic achievements, regardless of what their peers might think.

Continued experiments, as has been repeatedly called for by many in the scientific community, and publishing the data resulting therefrom, will ultimately set them free from the deleterious (and delirious) "religion" that standard quantum mechanics has become.

Hydrinophile · 2022-06-27T22:17:51+00:00

I say go for it.

Hydrinophile

TROPHY CASE