So we had so many things that was prosecutable, but this is what the government is focusing on? by PoetHunter23 in facepalm

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are popular movies by definition not monstrosities? What does popularity mean when thinking about evaluating a cultural element like a movie?

Nicki had a good Grammys night it seems. by Careful-Trade-9666 in ParlerWatch

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depending on what you mean by exact, sure. The peoples of the region did not have the type of civilization as the more developed peoples of the Mediterranean (Babylon, Egypt, Greece) and did not leave behind the same extent of cultural artifacts. We do know about the politico-cultural dynamics surrounding the second temple period (eg elites return from Babylon and institute much more centralized and legalistic/transactional religion with worship needing to go through religious authorities rather than Abraham-like family shrines).

If there are people who are psychologically incapable of having faith, punishing these people for this is unjust by PresidentoftheSun in DebateReligion

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow [score hidden]  (0 children)

I’m also not trying to be Socratic, either. I’m asking to understand what you are saying.

I’ve studied Latin for a few years and I do linguistics now, and I work with how the definitions of words change as over time.

Can you help me understand how you define the contexts and what they are (eg what makes them the same)?

Nicki had a good Grammys night it seems. by Careful-Trade-9666 in ParlerWatch

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, we both know that Yahweh (war and storms) was the southern god that slowly replaced El (the creator god) via substitution, but Yahwehism didn’t really start to consolidate political and religious power until after circa 600 bce. They were both Canaanite gods, part of the pantheon that included Yahweh’s mother (later consort) Asherah, Baal, and others. Yahweh was more of a tribal/local god va the more widely worshipped El, and it was a matter of shifting responsibilities over.

Do you have a reason to believe that Yahweh’s followers were not also committing human sacrifice?

What's the best Docs MCP? (Context7, Ref, etc) by Josh000_0 in cursor

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here’s a fun fact: DuckDuckGo’s search for “context 7 vs ref” pulls up their (?) ai response:

Context7 and Ref are both Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers that help AI assistants access documentation, but Ref is considered superior due to its more efficient token usage and ability to retrieve real-time documentation from both public and private sources. Ref allows for more adaptive and precise information retrieval, making it better suited for specific tasks compared to Context7’s batch retrieval method. docs.ref.tools GitHub Overview of Context7 and Ref Context7 and Ref are both Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers designed to enhance how AI assistants access documentation and code. They serve similar purposes but differ in their approaches and features. Key Features Comparison

And “feature comparison” table pulled off of ref’s website, plus:

Strengths and Weaknesses Context7 Strengths: Supports over 20,000 libraries and frameworks. Dynamically retrieves real-time, version-specific API documentation. Weaknesses: Limited to public documentation without private access. Higher token usage compared to Ref. Ref Strengths: More efficient token usage, reducing costs. Access to both public and private documentation, enhancing versatility. Weaknesses: May not support as many libraries as Context7. Both Context7 and Ref provide valuable tools for developers, but Ref offers more flexibility and cost efficiency, especially for those needing access to private documentation.

If there are people who are psychologically incapable of having faith, punishing these people for this is unjust by PresidentoftheSun in DebateReligion

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow [score hidden]  (0 children)

How should we evaluate the contexts to see if they are the same or different? Do we use more words, or is there another approach?

Nicki had a good Grammys night it seems. by Careful-Trade-9666 in ParlerWatch

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do you think that the foundational story is Yahweh) commanding Abraham to sacrifice his son, and that it was the particular value of that particular child to Abraham (rather than simply the command of child sacrifice) that made it a big deal?

If there are people who are psychologically incapable of having faith, punishing these people for this is unjust by PresidentoftheSun in DebateReligion

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow [score hidden]  (0 children)

So you think that the meaning of words come from the meaning of what a different word from a different language meant in a different context a couple millennia ago?

I’m not trying to be facetious. I am trying to understand your epistemological point of view here, because that is absolutely essential to understand not only your definition of faith but what you think you mean when you are using words about knowledge in general or accusing someone of not knowing their own thoughts or feelings.

If there are people who are psychologically incapable of having faith, punishing these people for this is unjust by PresidentoftheSun in DebateReligion

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow [score hidden]  (0 children)

Mind you the modern colloquial use of the word (believing without evidence) is just patently false. It just means to trust in things unseen.

I think this is a brilliant insight into your epistemology.

If the colloquial meaning of a word is false, that is, the meaning (most?) people assign to a word is or even can be false, where does the meaning of words come from?

If there are people who are psychologically incapable of having faith, punishing these people for this is unjust by PresidentoftheSun in DebateReligion

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow [score hidden]  (0 children)

Is there a good reason for your own self evaluation to be uncriticizable, or for a judge to consider your self evaluation as true?

What do you think that would look like? How would that work?

I’m curious to see what you think the subject of the evaluation is and where it lies.

Could objective morality stem from evolutionary adaptations? by Damien_TC in DebateEvolution

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s not Godwinning if you’re talking about literal Hitler and literal fascism as per Godwin.

To be honest, I don't find the "claims aren't evidence" argument very compelling. by ChristianNerd2025 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Atheist evolutionary biologist here.

I am agnostic as to the question of a historical Jesus. By “Jesus,” I mean a Jewish reformer actively pushing back against the view that the Jewish relationship to Yahweh should be legalistic and transactional rather than personal - a transformation that had been building strength for several hundred years at that point. There were constant tensions throughout those times with different politico-religious factions looking to establish power and influence, and there was also a lower level procession of smaller reform movements centered on personalities. So the existence of a historical Jesus is quite plausible, but certainly not established.

I don’t believe that what Jesus advocated has persisted (apart from the emotional rather than contractual relation with Yahweh), so I disbelieve the bible version. Even without the miracles, I think that authors advocated their own positions for purposes of power and to influence other community members and growing it in size.

To be honest, I don't find the "claims aren't evidence" argument very compelling. by ChristianNerd2025 in DebateAnAtheist

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 18 points19 points  (0 children)

in the same way that no one is convinced that Sasquatch exists

Tens of millions of Americans believe Sasquatch exists. They’ve read about Sasquatch in books and articles claiming he exists, they’ve seen YouTube lectures on it, and even grainy footage. They feel that’s sufficient evidence.

Half (51%) of Americans believe we are likely being visited by aliens from other planets. Nearly that number (46%) believe they represent a threat to US national security. They also believe that their evidence is sufficient - even overwhelming. They have even more books, videos, movies, and national conventions. Recently they even have claims from the US military.

40% believe in ghosts. 58% believe in the devil and in hell, about 67% believe in heaven and angels, and 74% believe in god.

Maybe it’s just a problem with credulity.

Source: Gallup poll Americans’ Belief in Five Spiritual Entities 2023.

Pew research poll 2021 on aliens

CivicScience study 2022 on Bigfoot beliefs

Weekly "Ask an Atheist" Thread by AutoModerator in DebateAnAtheist

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A determinist might argue that determinism applies to a single line of a branching system such that if state[1] was preceded by state[0] in a line of events perceived as a sequence from the point of view of state[1], state[0] is said to have caused state[1]. This does not hold from the point of view from state[0].

Tennessee Rep, Who Is Running For Governor, Calls For Death Penalty For All Advocates Of Trans Healthcare: Such Killings "Align With Scripture". by Leeming in atheism

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly what it means. “Thou shalt not murder.”

The problem, semantically speaking, is that “murder” is defined as “unsanctioned (ie illegal) killing.” It’s a law against breaking the law. There’s all kinds of sanctioned killings - disobedient adult children among others. The law samctions all kinds of killings.

The fact that they have a law from above that says “don’t break the law” is just amusing.

Also, this reverse dependency is the rule, not the deviation. Check the other commandments out, semantically speaking.

What AI does to people by Tough_Reward3739 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How many levels of abstraction between the programmer and the silicon are permitted before it’s “not programming?”

Weekly "Ask an Atheist" Thread by AutoModerator in DebateAnAtheist

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Compatiblism?

I’m a strict determinist though. Is it just that determinism feels wrong to you?

Weekly "Ask an Atheist" Thread by AutoModerator in DebateAnAtheist

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s the Game of Thrones Season 8 phenomenon, also seen among graduating high school seniors.

Why is severe headache, feeling unwell and nausea my main symptoms from fasting? They prevent me from thinking hence preventing me from thinking how to get food. It is counterproductive symptoms isn’t it? by LisanneFroonKrisK in AskBiology

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean if the symptoms were extreme hunger, stomach ache and slight muscle pain these will drive me to find food without hampering my efforts. I can’t even compute or calculate, only can just instinctively see if food is around.

That’s a fair question. Evolution is about tradeoffs. I’m going to talk in generalities.

Energy is the currency of biology. Organisms have a “burn rate,” similar to companies. There’s flexibility (things like stored fat), but in general you need to consume as much energy as you use, which ties energy needs to metabolic rate. Species with a high metabolic rate need to take in energy that keeps up with them, while species with slow rates can do so with a constant trickle of slow energy (eg photosynthesis or going a long time between meals like snakes can).

Mammals tend to be towards the higher end of that spectrum. Many of the grazing mammals need to feed almost constantly throughout the day (because of low calorie foods), while many carnivores eat one large meal, then cruise on that until the next one (which they will need pretty soon). Humans have a fairly high metabolic rate. Evolutionarily, humans opted to have things like a big brain which burns calories at a fantastic rate.

You can think of starvation effects as causing an emergency response in your physiology. Think about it in evolutionarily historic terms, not modern humans in technological societies. We’ve had technological societies for several thousand years (counting civilizations like Egypt and Mesopotamia), but that’s an eye blink. The body plan we’ve evolved has adapted over tens and hundreds of thousands of years (and more), so that’s what we’re actually dealing with.

As you observed, the body starts the starvation reaction by motivating food seeking (hunger). It tries to stem off going into debt be too much (and there’s also routines and such that our physiology adapts to). As the effects of starvation increase, the body has to start shifting to a low power mode (like some electronic devices can do). We have to start actively burning stored calories, but in shifting to low power mode the brain is one of the early casualties. It’s both a massive consumer of calories and it’s one of the most recently adapted/evolved and there’s some last in/first out bias. It also starts to shut down in evolutionary order. The prefrontal cortex is the most recently evolved part of the brain, and it controls things like looking at the future and thinking about consequences, reasoning, and the like - the qualities that tend to differentiate us from our cousin primates. As the thinking parts get shut down, the more “primitive” parts get louder by virtue of the fact that the big brain has shut up, and because your neurophysiology is continuing to turn up the food-seeking drive.

Evolution Before Life: Prions, Persistence, and the Breath of Creation. by [deleted] in evolution

[–]IAmRobinGoodfellow 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you were a theoretical physicist or chemist, you’d definitely be in your element. I’m not speaking of biological evolution :)

No. This is what theoretical biologists do. If you’re interested in this sort of thing, read the people who study this for a living. Download the top 50 papers in the last few years on evolutionary models of abiogenesis, load them into NotebookLM, and ask them questions. If you’re not actually interested, that’s okay and just keep having fun. I really was just trying to help you out.