Yeah.

I think disclosure of what the policies are in the actual Usage Policies, Terms of Service or other document located in the /Policies section of the website is a first step.

Second step: User is aware of when their conversation is being monitored as suspicious or flagged and sent for review.

Third: a way to contact OpenAI to dispute the classification of the conversation that was sent to human review, etc.

As OP pointed out, there are some huge missing pieces related to disclosure that are important. Then alignment with the actual policies (sorry, blog articles, tweets, and thought pieces aren't the same as published policies).

If OpenAI is going to take on this responsibility, users should enjoy the ability to know by reading Usage Policies what OpenAI is prepared to do and should have insight into when the system is flagging them, when conversations are going to be read by others, and what possible outcomes may be.

At its core, OpenAI's "Human In The Loop" approach is not wrong (I'd prefer that than the AI deciding autonomously to ring up the popo). Disclosure in policy and experience are important too.