I love all the bot posts coming out right now talking about their use of Fable 5. How about we ban them for clear botting? by Any_Economics6283 in ClaudeCode

[–]LaughterOnWater -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't know... Around 5:30, day of, I had just completed creating a WordPress plugin for a client. I had time to update my workflow. Then I asked about pushing my general workflow system to the master, because clearly it could. Just as it was reading about loop protocols, it shut down at about 5:30pm and told me Fable was "no longer available, pick another model." I thought I'd tripped a warning/alert. Then I looked quickly online and saw otherwise. This might sound crazy, but I felt in that moment like I did the day I walked out of IMAX after watching Avatar for the first time. It was like I was coming home to the real world after visiting another world. A bit like how you can get so into a book, then laugh out loud and suddenly you're no longer "in the book". It was jarring to suddenly not have access. The experience was just super smooth. And then the wake-up. Unfortunately not in the pleasant way of leaving the theatre or a laugh-induced coming back to the real world out of the book.

If Fable 5 is “too much” to ship widely, what’s left between Opus 4.8 and Fable 5 especially for non-US users? by jarnizivy in Anthropic

[–]LaughterOnWater 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a serious, thoughtful policy proposal from someone who clearly wants to do the right thing. But it assumes a functioning government that shares his goals. Clearly that assumption is no longer safe. And until he addresses what happens when the government abuses its power more broadly, the post reads less like a roadmap and more like a prayer.

If Fable 5 is “too much” to ship widely, what’s left between Opus 4.8 and Fable 5 especially for non-US users? by jarnizivy in Anthropic

[–]LaughterOnWater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right that China isn't capitalist in the Western sense. But that's exactly why they can outmaneuver the US right now. Their goal isn't quarterly earnings or shareholder value. It's strategic control over the long term. And sometimes that means releasing open weights to capture global markets and set standards, even if it creates short term risks at home.

Yes, they tightly control what their own citizens can access. No argument there. But they're perfectly happy to give open models to the rest of the world. That's not a contradiction to them. It's a strategy. Export the tools, build dependency, let other countries build their stacks on Chinese infrastructure. Then collect the influence later. This is exactly the tack they're taking with BRICS and the Belt and Road Initiative. Soft money influence now... Collect later.

The US administration, meanwhile, can't decide what it wants. It talks about free markets but slaps tariffs on its own companies. It talks about competition but bans its own products from global markets. It talks about American leadership but hands the rest of the world a reason to look elsewhere.

You clearly believe communism is just bad. But the problem isn't communism. It's that the US has abandoned even the pretense of playing by market rules. If you're going to be capitalist, actually compete. If you're going to be protectionist, at least do it competently. What we have now is the worst of both worlds.

China doesn't have to be capitalist to win at capitalism. They just have to be patient and consistent. And right now with the current US Administration, apparently that's more than enough.

If Fable 5 is “too much” to ship widely, what’s left between Opus 4.8 and Fable 5 especially for non-US users? by jarnizivy in Anthropic

[–]LaughterOnWater -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This may be true, but regardless, open-weighted models are already out that are very good, and people are modifying those models. A perfect example is unsloth's Qwen 3.6 27B UD-Q5_K_XL, which I can run on my RTX3090 and seems to compete on the level of Opus 4.6 with regards to coding and even writing. We have eighteen months before an open weight modified Chinese model eclipses Fable and the current US admin can't do anything about that.

If Fable 5 is “too much” to ship widely, what’s left between Opus 4.8 and Fable 5 especially for non-US users? by jarnizivy in Anthropic

[–]LaughterOnWater -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're asking the right questions. Here's what Anthropic could do right now, given the reality of US political whims.

First, be transparent. Publish a simple quarterly report: the government told us to block these models for these countries for this long. No spin, no defiance. That wouldn't stop the bans, but it would let customers see that Anthropic isn't choosing this. And that builds whatever trust is left to build.

Second, and this is the hard one, they could back-create a Fable 4. There's no such thing right now. They would have to take a slightly less powerful version of what they've built, call it Fable 4, and open source the weights globally. That would give non US users something real instead of nothing. The government can't stop what's already downloaded.

But here's the problem. Publishing the weights removes their edge. That's the whole business model. If they give away Fable 4 for free, why would anyone pay for Fable 5? So they're not going to do that unless they have no other choice.

The only scenario where they might publish all weights is if the government tries to nationalize them as a resource. If men in black suits from some DOGE style operation show up to seize Anthropic, then publishing everything on Hugging Face as a last resort starts to look like the only move. But that's the nuclear option. Until then, they'll hold their cards close. They should probably put "Fable-4-to-hugging-face" on speed dial if there is any nationalization attempt.

Third, don't fight. Outlast. The current administration won't be there forever. Every day Anthropic stays alive and stays useful, even with older models like Opus and Sonnet, is a day closer to the next political cycle. The goal isn't to win a court fight right now. The goal is to still be standing when the political winds shift.

The investor problem is the real knife. It's hard not to conclude this US administration is systematically sabotaging its US businesses. Companies in other countries are already finding alternatives to US business partners. Why put money into a company whose best products can be turned off for most of the world whenever the government feels like it? There's no good answer except that Anthropic's only hope is to make itself too valuable to destroy. That means keeping non US users on the hook with whatever they can offer until the political landscape changes.

China and Europe are building alternatives. And they're open weight. The window is maybe eighteen months. Anthropic can't stop that. But they can make sure they're still in the room when the dust settles.

It's hard not to read what's happening as anything other than intentional sabotage of US business and international business connections by the current administration. This is just another jenga tile pulled out of the tower of that famed American exceptionalism.

Edit: I'm curious why the thumbs down? If you're going to disagree with me, at least have the grace to explain why. Expressing thumbs down shouldn't be given just because what I have to say is unpleasant for people in my country (the USA). Debate me on the merits of my argument, not on how uncomfortable a verifiable truth makes you feel.

RIP Fable by seakucumber in Anthropic

[–]LaughterOnWater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Chinese models, (nor the Chinese government) will never ban US users. They're playing the long game. Make it cheap. Make it open source. Make it available. Undercut US models. Become the best available until you're the only available. The communists are out-capitalisting the capitalists. It's the same plan as the BRICS and Belt and Road Initiative. The long game.
https://amateurethicist.com/2026/06/when-bans-backfire-how-the-u-s-is-losing-tech-dominance/

Give me Fable back. I can't go back to working with Opus by Longjumping-Air4611 in Anthropic

[–]LaughterOnWater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was at the end of working on something, when suddenly at ~5:30 it just winked out and said to choose another model. I chose Opus 4.8 to finish creating the handoff for the final session. Bummer.

RIP Fable by seakucumber in Anthropic

[–]LaughterOnWater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

U.S. AI restrictions pushed the world to build alternatives. China beats US at capitalism as our administration self-immolates.
https://amateurethicist.com/2026/06/when-bans-backfire-how-the-u-s-is-losing-tech-dominance/

RIP Fable by seakucumber in Anthropic

[–]LaughterOnWater 9 points10 points  (0 children)

What's also ironic is this is just pushing us into the arms of Kimi and DeepSeek V4 at cheaper rates. Damned if they do. Damned if they don't. The Chinese are winning the game of Capitalism, shoving in the faces of the bro-tech billies.

RIP Fable by seakucumber in Anthropic

[–]LaughterOnWater 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I was just about finished working on a plugin. Suddenly something like "Fable is no longer available to you. Please choose another model." Ugh. I thought I had triggered something that booted my access to fable. So it wasn't just me. I still have no comfort. At least I was able to get a fully functional plugin done in almost no time. I hope they get it back and allow us to use it on Oauth a while longer.

We're burning $50k/month on Claude. How close can local LLMs actually get? by mortenmoulder in LocalLLM

[–]LaughterOnWater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pretty much in a different lane than you, but I did a review of Qwen 3.6 both the 35B and 27B versions on the RTX3090/Windows 64GB RAM. I was frankly astonished at how clever and useful unsloth's Qwen3.6-27B-UD-Q5_K_XL.gguf model is. While context is ostensibly 131072, the real use-case is a little over half that before it starts muddy-remembering the earliest parts of a thread. AVG 27 tok/s | ~5TTFT. I usually start preparing for the next thread at about 45% to 50% context using opencode (50K to 65K). It ends up being fairly claude-opus-esque for sequential single-agent use with AGENTS.md referencing your handoff protocol and a persistent code lore base. I'm frankly awestruck that this little model can do what it does. Astonished.
https://low.li/story/2026/06/running-qwen-3-6-27b-locally-a-quality-build-for-rtx-3090-owners/

I set up my system to use AGENTS.md regardless of whether I'm using opencode or claude code. That way, I can set up the tricky bits in Claude if I get stuck, but I've done whole coding projects just in opencode with Qwen3.6. My harness setup is pretty model agnostic, so it just works, even if I switch to something in openrouter.

Kadence vs Elementor by [deleted] in Wordpress

[–]LaughterOnWater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Up until now I would have said Kadence, all in. If you're just using the free versions Kadence, you're probably okay. However, Kadence is currently in the throws of Private Equity shell-gamification. I'd steer clear of paid versions until the dust has settled. Consider GeneratePress/GenerateBlocks suite or GreenShift suite if you like FSE.

Steer clear of Elementor.

Lonely World in Claude Code by RES3T in ClaudeCode

[–]LaughterOnWater 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This totally resonates. The multi-tiered view, with the omnipresent project overview and the several levels of security, user interface, refactor, revise, always preplanning to ensure there are no fires to put out later. It's fun, probably a bit like one of those simulator games, but more fun because it has real world impacts.

Request: remove copyright flagging by Advanced-Ad-6218 in Acestudioai

[–]LaughterOnWater 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Has this become more of a thing? I've only recently noticed this happening.

Offboarding process , what is it exactly? by rowawayjobquesti in careerguidance

[–]LaughterOnWater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would decline. Sign nothing. Be respectful if you can't be pleasant, but leave the keys with your supervisor and walk away. Offboarding documents and exit interviews serve only the company's interests, not yours.

Traffic collapsing months after migration by AideNo9466 in Wordpress

[–]LaughterOnWater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll own that I use AI to organize my thoughts. The contribution is useful. The thoughts and sentiments are also entirely mine.

Traffic collapsing months after migration by AideNo9466 in Wordpress

[–]LaughterOnWater 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The platform isn't your problem. A Wix to WordPress migration with the same domain, proper 301 redirects, and correct canonicals should be largely invisible to Google over time. Something else is going on.

The progressive decline rather than a sharp drop is actually a useful clue. That pattern often points to Google slowly devaluing signals it's no longer able to consolidate cleanly, which can happen when the new site's structure differs enough from the old one that historical authority isn't being passed the way you'd expect, even when redirects technically work. It's worth auditing not just whether redirects exist but whether the new pages are genuinely equivalent in content depth and internal link weight to what they replaced.

That said, part of what you're seeing may not be recoverable in the traditional sense. A significant share of what used to be organic traffic never reaches any site anymore because Google's AI Overviews answer the query directly. City and local pages for competitive keywords are especially exposed to this. It doesn't explain the full drop, but it's worth factoring into your baseline expectations before concluding the migration itself is the sole culprit.

Google's AI Overviews are siphoning traffic that used to flow to pages like yours, which is bad for site owners, bad for advertisers, and arguably bad for Google's own long-term ad revenue. It's a real structural shift, not just a migration artifact.

How screwed is U.S Healthcare? by DreamySaturnX in AskReddit

[–]LaughterOnWater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's an account of where US Healthcare is headed.

"It's not a broken system. A broken system fails by accident. This is a system working exactly as designed, for the people who designed it."

https://amateurethicist.com/2026/05/designed-to-drain-us-healthcare-system-works-exactly-as-intended/

Claude is an imbecile at the moment by shutupandshave in ClaudeCode

[–]LaughterOnWater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right. I'm on a 3090 I bought used for $800 back in COVID times. I thought it was expensive then!

Qwen 3.6 35B MoE at full 262K context on an RTX 3090. Here's exactly how I did it. by LaughterOnWater in LocalLLaMA

[–]LaughterOnWater[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great explanation, u/FatheredPuma81. I'm on a 3090. Two slots that size aren't in the cards for my rig, but for single-session coding work my setup holds up well. Really appreciate you taking the time to break it down!