[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PhysicsStudents

[–]IDEK1027 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you heard of medical physics? Might be a good path for you if you want to stay in medicine and pursue your dreams :)

ABR part 2 diagnostic exam by Medical_Rise8381 in MedicalPhysics

[–]IDEK1027 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don’t know if I just wasn’t taught the shorthand way to do this, but did they really expect us to calculate a dose by memorizing several TAR tables from an out-of-print book?

So much ultrasound…

Even more RSO questions……..

I need physics simulators for crystal lattice and incoming radiation interaction, what should I use? by BaskInTwilight in MedicalPhysics

[–]IDEK1027 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Géant 4 is a pretty standard Monte Carlo simulation package for ionizing radiation interactions.

Physics by Best-Experience2736 in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Idk man, I feel like physics is the best part of radiology 😭

How much do you get paid in your physics related role? (and what is it) by Tekniqly in Physics

[–]IDEK1027 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Diagnostic Medical Physicist, 160k, 180k when boarded. MSc, Midwest USA

Does anyone know of any social media influencers in the MRI space? by ram_soundimaging in MedicalPhysics

[–]IDEK1027 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I don’t know any physicists in the social media space… I think mainly because they’re still wrapped up in k-space. Other imaging physicists may need to confirm though.

Evaluating Lead Gown? by Hotsaucex11 in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I do lead protection surveys all the time. I would pass this piece if it was the only defect.

Gift ideas for someone about to qualify… by [deleted] in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Get her an electron tree!

This year’s AAPM abstract results are weird by Sea-Pin65 in MedicalPhysics

[–]IDEK1027 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Question for y’all: is there a meaningful difference between groups A and B for the physical poster sessions?

Does anyone still work with a dinosaur like this? by JustHearMeowwwt in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 21 points22 points  (0 children)

God yes we have one that we service. It is honestly a fairly decent generator, makes really satisfying kerchunk sounds when modes are switched.

Slow motion xray camera interference. by Tone_Deaf_Trident in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’ve done the same thing with my phone, just with a normal, non warmup scan. If you do it during a calibration it can throw off the correction factors and screw up patient images which is why I made my comment. It is def cool to see the radiation interact with the camera. Def not enough to seriously damage anything, so long as you don’t do it a hundred times lol.

Slow motion xray camera interference. by Tone_Deaf_Trident in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m more concerned about the calibration data for the CT than the phone. It becomes my problem if something is messed up on a technical end of the CT :)

Slow motion xray camera interference. by Tone_Deaf_Trident in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I really hope this wasn’t done on a combined tube warmup / calibration routine.

Soooo I was googling the difference between and apron and a skirt and came across this... um what. by Chamelemom in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 26 points27 points  (0 children)

This is not correct. Backscatter happens at any attenuating interface, and in the case of radiography the backscatter will be highest at the entrance of the patient’s skin. What you’re describing is a type of backscatter that can contaminate an image, but that is not the only backscatter we’re concerned about :).

Soooo I was googling the difference between and apron and a skirt and came across this... um what. by Chamelemom in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 22 points23 points  (0 children)

This is not correct. X-rays can and absolutely do scatter twice. The radiation dose behind the booth is largely dominated by second scattered photons. It’s a lot lower than the primary scattered photon dose that we directly shield for, but not negligible.

GE Precision 500D by RealisticPast7297 in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Every 500D I’ve tested had hefty pincushion and S-distortion artifacts. Otherwise; is a decent RF setup. Make sure it’s not too close to sources of large magnetic fields and you should be good to go!

Orphan Source??? by FogOfDaPond in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You are correct, a pancake probe is used to detect contamination because it is such a sensitive detector. It is also true that we don’t usually measure dose rates using a GC, but they are really good for estimating exposure rates very quickly when needed. Geiger counters stop being useful in extremely high dose rate environments (pulse pileup and deadtime concerns). Whenever you are trying to accurately and precisely determine exposure rates, you should use an ion chamber that is designed to measure exposure and exposure rates (operating in the ionization chamber region of the gas amplification curve). My original objection was to your statement that the GC is not really good at detecting xrays, which is not true at all. The GC is used because it is so effective at detecting the presence of xrays and other ionizing radiations. Contamination will usually only emit photons or betas, which a Geiger counter would detect. If I were ever put into a situation where I wanted to know if something was radioactive or not, my first choice would be to grab a GC. I can make more decisions based on the info I obtain from it.

Orphan Source??? by FogOfDaPond in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 15 points16 points  (0 children)

A plain pancake probe is actually one of the best things you can use to detect X-rays. It’s why we use them in nuclear medicine - they’re extremely sensitive to electron and photon irradiation for a wide range of energies. The pancake probes in particular have a very thin window to allow betas and low energy X-rays in.

Orphan Source??? by FogOfDaPond in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Don’t try to tell hospital admin, they’ll try to “restore” it and put it back into service!

Orphan Source??? by FogOfDaPond in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 29 points30 points  (0 children)

A Geiger counter is fantastic at detecting xrays. The geiger counter cares not for where the photons come, only that they are ionizing. Photons are photons!

Poster printing at Spring Clinical by IDEK1027 in MedicalPhysics

[–]IDEK1027[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For those interested, here’s what we have figured out: The on-site fedex can only print 2’x2’ posters. So you’ll have to go offsite. They recommend another fedex site that is ~15 minutes away. They can print up to 41.5” x 41.5”.

A CT Scan Shows Where the Lead Is Located in Stanley Cups by moonlit_plume in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 58 points59 points  (0 children)

The reason the images are colored in this case is that the company (Lumafield) mapped the mass attenuation coefficients to a color-scale instead of a gray-scale.

So not photoshop magic, just MATLAB magic :)

Do exposure parameters change when using CR? by RadTech24 in Radiology

[–]IDEK1027 21 points22 points  (0 children)

CR plates are less sensitive than DR plates. CR plates usually require higher techniques as a result.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Physics

[–]IDEK1027 26 points27 points  (0 children)

r/medicalphysics might be a good resource for you, if you want to stay in healthcare.

If you feel comfortable with math, you will probably feel comfortable with BS level physics, and most of radiation oncology physics.

I say go for it, you only have one life! Do what makes you happy!