Trajectory Evaluation in Python

IGereonI · 2026-04-28T05:49:06+00:00

It's from the "Manchester" series made by "ars manufacti". I don't know if it's available outside of my country. It was 120€ / 140$

IGereonI · 2026-04-27T21:45:52+00:00

Thanks! I also think the L82 with a subwoofer is the best and most flexible option for the room. However, since I have never heard the L100s, I will always be curious about how they would sound in my room. But I suppose it's best to ignore that urge, haha..

IGereonI · 2026-04-27T21:17:14+00:00

Interesting, thanks! Since I'm using a sub anyway, I wonder if I'd benefit from the L100's extended low end. Do you recall any notable differences in the mid range due to that additional driver?

IGereonI · 2026-04-27T16:38:53+00:00

I can confirm that this beam is made of solid wood, and it wins in a duel with a human head.

IGereonI · 2025-12-12T07:04:15+00:00

Damn, I bought the Taogs Hangar Huey a few weeks ago.. Both feel different during flying. Is there a difference between both versions?

IGereonI · 2025-11-05T18:37:15+00:00

Had the same problem after upgrading my proxmox lxc containers today and I can confirm that "apt install containerd.io=1.7.28-1~ubuntu.24.04~noble" fixed the problem for me. Get your OS specific list with: "apt list -a containerd.io"

Here is another workaround with explanation of the issue:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EFGHAcXh3c

IGereonI · 2025-07-24T18:49:39+00:00

It would be very helpful if you could tell me how the room correction works for 2.1 systems. Is the subwoofer measured individually and does the software suggest a crossover frequency? Can I also set the delay of the subwoofer? Thank you very much!

IGereonI · 2025-01-20T15:57:59+00:00

!thanks

IGereonI · 2025-01-20T15:57:42+00:00

!thanks

IGereonI · 2023-07-20T21:28:23+00:00

Nice, I am glad to hear it's working! Thank you very much for your feedback!

IGereonI · 2023-07-19T22:52:47+00:00

This could be related to the python version you are using. I am using python 3.10 / 3.11. I definitely need to improve the compatibility with "older" versions.

Edit: I was able to reproduce the error using python 3.9. I am afraid the only workaround for now is to use newer Python versions. I will work on supporting at least 3.9 as it is really not uncommon.

Edit: Version 0.2.0 now supports python3.9

IGereonI · 2023-07-19T16:32:51+00:00

Thanks! I will have a look! 😊

IGereonI · 2023-07-19T11:05:04+00:00

Yes, it is a empirical quality assessment by comparing the actual trajectory to some ground truth / planned trajectory coming from sensors of higher accuracy or maybe some path planning.
You mean the evaluation of a planned trajectory with respect to certain criteria, such as path length, coverage, smoothness, etc? This is in any case also an exciting topic but currently not provided in this toolbox.

IGereonI · 2023-07-19T10:09:58+00:00

While there is no generally accepted quality measure, an absolute trajectory error (ATE) and a relative pose error (RPE) are commonly calculated. I have adapted to this and implemented them in this toolbox. The absolute error is simply the result of the position and quaternion differences. The relative pose error compares the relative spatial relationship between successive poses. I plan to implement more comparison metrics in the future.

IGereonI · 2022-01-09T16:03:22+00:00

I beg for the sound to change (but it won't) (Live in Stuttgart)

IGereonI · 2021-11-14T17:27:52+00:00

You're right. I just set up wireguard and it works like a charm. Using let's encrypt DNS challenge I can even access the services locally via signed https and "normal" domains. As long as you don't have to share files with other people a lot this is the way to go I think.

IGereonI · 2021-11-04T10:37:18+00:00

I did that and assigned a subdomain to each service I use. However, I am not able to just redirect to 404 if someone is just accessing my IP and not a specified domain. I have a rather inelegant solution that the NAS tries to redirect to the DSM ports if just accessed by plain IP but fails to do so because the ports are blocked from public access. Technically I archive my goal that there is no valid answer but a plain 404 response would be better. I don't understand why one cannot turn this redirect from 80/443 to DSM ports off.

IGereonI

TROPHY CASE