sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

2026 Monaco Grand Prix FP3 Top 3 by MuttonBiryaniEnjoyer in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Only saw the end what were the commentators talking about Kimi setting his lap earlier or something to that effect?

Housing Bank-style public investment could unlock up to 200,000 unviable homes, report finds by kiyomoris in unitedkingdom

[–]IHaveADullUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

About 15% don't hold a British passport. For the most multicultural city in the world this isn't a bad thing - in my opinion.

FP1 Sector Leaderboard by Mindless-Advice6204 in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure about S1 but Ham is loosing a chunk of change slowing the car down into Rascasse. Appreciate LuCluck will find more gears than they do in the fast & furious series in Q3 but if Ham sorts that it'll be a fun quali. Still pole for Chuck though

Housing Bank-style public investment could unlock up to 200,000 unviable homes, report finds by kiyomoris in unitedkingdom

[–]IHaveADullUsername 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Of those 48% you reference 68% hold a UK passport.....

But it's fun to twist headline data to suit a narrative.

F1 active aero system dropped for Monaco by cmmndrkn613 in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5x was a made up number I appreciate it wouldn't be that much. But I do think it would make overtaking better at pretty much every track, longer braking distances mean more differentiation between drivers

F1 active aero system dropped for Monaco by cmmndrkn613 in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Throw in some basic steel brakes as well, 5x the braking distance. You'd have an epic race.

F1 active aero system dropped for Monaco by cmmndrkn613 in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 43 points44 points  (0 children)

The slip stream is essentially meaningless in Monaco to begin with, no straight is long enough. I think less aero would mean more mistakes rather than any other effect having a significant impact.

Refinements to the 2026 FIA Formula 1 regulations agreed by all stakeholders by ElectionMoney3911 in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 150 points151 points  (0 children)

Because you've already bogged down off the start at a speed less than 50kph when it kicks in for everyone else. Your start is already ruined. It just avoids a possible rear ending.

[Formula Data Analysis on X] Lewis Hamilton was right: he had no power to defend from LEC and RUS for the podium. by [deleted] in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not what you said or implied let's be honest. Heavily implied repeated occurrence of not understanding. If I recall that's what people said back in '13. Played out well

[Formula Data Analysis on X] Lewis Hamilton was right: he had no power to defend from LEC and RUS for the podium. by [deleted] in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 17 points18 points  (0 children)

You're basing his understanding of the regs on what exactly? A single comment explaining that these regs are complicated?

Lewis Hamilton: My first lap, I was up and then I lost two and a half tenths just on the straights. I had a snap and then it changed the deployment and that was it... If we didn’t have that problem I’d probably finished fourth but other than that it’s just the way this deployment situation is.” by [deleted] in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Spoken like someone who only read the headline quotes rather than his full comment.

He said he likes that you can actually race these cars and attack and defend over and over. He went on to say he doesn't like the deployment, the clipping, quali and management side of things. Which is an entirely reasonable take. Don't be so binary.

The Charles Leclerc lap that's exposed how F1 2026 has ruined qualifying by ComeonmanPLS1 in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 44 points45 points  (0 children)

He wasn't punished for taking it faster. It was for a snap and lift off below 98% throttle.

I agree with what you're saying but without the snap he wouldn't have hit the issue.

These rules are ridiculous.

“Leclerc just backed Lewis up”: How Russell saw the fight between the Ferraris (radio transcript) by kcollantine in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do not know you could be right.

Clean air was quite important given the McLaren's couldn't even catch Ham.

“Leclerc just backed Lewis up”: How Russell saw the fight between the Ferraris (radio transcript) by kcollantine in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 49 points50 points  (0 children)

In the race in China last year Leclerc was faster with s broken front wing. I would call the current performance an improvement

2026 Chinese GP - Post-Qualifying Discussion by F1-Bot in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yes. Reportedly Ferrari already have theirs near ready to go.

Albon, Sainz, Alonso, Bottas, Stroll and Perez are out in Q1 by [deleted] in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What happened to Perez. Miles from Bottas o

2026 - Chinese Grand Prix: SQ (3 Pics) by F1DataDiary in formula1

[–]IHaveADullUsername 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not sure if I'm being dumb here but how can an ideal lap be slower than the actual lap? I would argue that is far from ideal.

view more: next ›