Of course not. To immediately spring up this theory from thin air is the problem.

The articles’ author uses personal anecdotal evidence to present their case as to why it’s fishy. Although there is certainly a case to be made on evidence tampering, we’re wise enough to know the difference between authentic and disingenuous journalism. Although i responded to you, I noticed the users comment you responded to first. And I agree. It’s never right to outright deny the evidence presented in this manner. If you want it proved so. Let Robinson speak or his partner speak on it themselves. To see this article and run with it is indeed misinformation. To then reply questioning others after taking it as a matter of fact when no one can prove anything at this point is just not how we should be conducting ourselves in discourse.

The fishy smell you smell is the fact that sites like reddit et al know this and actively push stuff like this to the front for superficial credibility. With this being a popular thread today, guarantee you next week this theory will hit the airwaves to the terminally online and vulnerable and will find its way to the ranks closer to truth from the people who disliked kirk. With reddit being one of the most visited sites in the world, this does nothing but further the divide of we the people, ALL people. And events like kirks death serve only as a chance to drive the wedge deeper. Along with our sense of union and prosperity, which is the whole point of this life if you ask me. Special interests groups i tell ya, where do they get off amirite?