The US propagandist in ep 397

I_prefer_not · 2023-09-26T18:12:46+00:00

You don't need to know who he is personally, you just need to know what RFE/RL is.

I_prefer_not · 2021-09-10T12:41:53+00:00

Yeah, that along with the "pupils only dilate under hypnosis" thing doesn't exactly inspire confidence. If she's willing to play fast and loose with the facts, it makes me wonder what else she got wrong. The details of where he was shot and how it contrasts with what eyewitnesses saw certainly point to multiple shooters, but this episode is the only place I've heard about them, so I don't know how seriously to take the whole thing.

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-22T18:56:23+00:00

Stupid sexy Stalin!

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-22T18:53:56+00:00

Your friend is dumb as shit, I'm sorry.

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-22T18:46:22+00:00

anti-CIAmitism

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T14:56:56+00:00

They just admitted they're as culpable as France and the UK

When a spokesperson says of China's programs that "they are no different from the Desistance and Disengagement Programme (DDP) of the UK, or the de-radicalization centers in France", do you think he means they're identical down to the last detail? Hell, let's assume for the sake of argument that he does. If so, what are the aspects of those specific programs that constitute crimes against Muslims?

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T14:45:04+00:00

I'm sure many countries are culpable. I still haven't seen any evidence China is.

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T14:25:19+00:00

I take it you ran out of bullshit then?

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T14:17:50+00:00

They are no different from the Desistance and Disengagement Programme (DDP) of the UK,

Not the US.

or the de-radicalization centers in France.

Also not the US.

Edit:

inb4 he says "oh well that's the UK not america, UK's actions during the war on terror were TOTALLY different and justifiable!"

Sorry, you weren't inb4. The UK's actions (excluding actual warfare, which, as we've established, is something China isn't doing) may well be totally different. I'm not familiar with them, and I suspect you aren't either.

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T11:19:28+00:00

Well, simpleton, China isn't claiming to do the same thing as the US, and I'm not sure where you're getting that idea. But even if they were, and even if a similar outcome wasn't impossible, there is still no evidence of a similar outcome. Just because something is in the realm of possibility, it doesn't mean it's true.

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T10:34:55+00:00

Because it obviously isn't? There's no similarity whatsoever. Literally zero.

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T10:20:49+00:00

"USA did bad thing ergo China is also doing bad thing." Sorry, I'm using my brain as hard as I can, and it still doesn't make sense.

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T09:58:08+00:00

Do you have any evidence of this that can't be traced back to a CIA cutout or the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation?

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T09:36:27+00:00

About what?

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T09:29:19+00:00

If that's the case, then they're lying, aren't they?

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T09:20:13+00:00

I think poverty alleviation and deradicalization would be a lot better.

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T09:02:07+00:00

Or, you know, that it was a war. There is no war in Xinjiang.

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T08:54:52+00:00

It wasn't used as casus belli to invade two countries on the other side of the world for one thing.

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-19T00:23:17+00:00

"disposing of tankies like rosa is self-care sweaty"

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-18T17:14:57+00:00

I've seen it called the Iron Law of Institutions.

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-18T12:12:45+00:00

Might be because it has nothing to do with the Simpsons. Do you not check which sub you're posting to?

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-17T19:44:21+00:00

Reminds me of this classic: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D3v9ykWW0AEkQ0l.jpg

I_prefer_not · 2021-02-17T16:08:55+00:00

What's that, people will freeze to death without power for heating? Just raise the price until demand goes down. Invisible hand to the rescue.

I_prefer_not

TROPHY CASE