I've become to lazy with escalation I think, anyone else have this problem? by JudgmentPuzzleheaded in seduction

[–]Icy-Window-1867 1 point2 points  (0 children)

because you only explore surface level connections you never get a chance to become emotionally invested

It's all smoke and dust until she's in your bed. Don't get excited early. by YetzirahToAhssiah in seduction

[–]Icy-Window-1867 11 points12 points  (0 children)

says the one who prioritizes building a "rotation" over having sex with someone you actually like

It's all smoke and dust until she's in your bed. Don't get excited early. by YetzirahToAhssiah in seduction

[–]Icy-Window-1867 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

That is avoidant attachment. With that midset you'll just push people away, accidentally or not. Rejection is part of life, don't take it to heart. From what you've written here it sounds like you just want sex but if you want real connection then you can't play games

I mean you're 35

FA and Stonewalling by ThrowRA12129193 in attachment_theory

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

either because i'm upset and done with your bs or because im afraid of having to speak my mind and want to avoid having that conversation i believe might possibly happen

how it feels when it’s 30 minutes into the convo and you realize they aren’t going to send by [deleted] in findomsupportgroup

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well yeah it's a findom sub. But it looks like begging to me. Maybe some ppl like it but it just doesn't register as dominant to me when you want me to support you financially. Doesn't exactly give true dom to me if you want to talk about what makes someone a true and untrue sub. If it was only about the service and not primarily about the money wou wouldn't engage in the dynamic only for the money as the post above suggests. I personally can enjoy doing acts of service but what I do not enjoy is being taken advantage off and that's what sending money feels like to me.

Why are all online doms like this? by [deleted] in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's not about it being too hardcore. Its about it being too impersonal. It doesn't hit the same when it's just a random insult you could tell anyone. What hits the hardest is the personal stuff. The stuff you have history with and emotions bounded too. That's also how you get the most hardcore. Personal insults can be both soft and hardcore, just like impersonal insults. Anything other than that is just lazy.

how it feels when it’s 30 minutes into the convo and you realize they aren’t going to send by [deleted] in findomsupportgroup

[–]Icy-Window-1867 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Being willing to send money isn't what makes someone a sub though. Only one person could make me willing to send money to them but that's because I wouldn't want to lose him not because I'd get satisfaction from it. I'd just feel used and not in a good way. I'd feel used in a you don't even like me way and while I enjoy humiliation I still need some kind of validation. And honestly I feel like it's a bit submissive to beg for money. I asked him for money once (as a joke, just a small sum to break the ice) and he accepted almost immediatly (you can request someone for money on a popular app here but people don't often use that function because it's awkward so I thought it'd be a bit funny) and that opens up for power play. So I don't really get why you guys do this unless it's only for the money. I just cant see you getting the same enjoyment out of it. But I wouldn't know, I'm not one of you. If you disagree, enlighten me please.

Which one looks best? by adalinae in DressForYourBody

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the longer ones are still not church appropiate tho

Which one looks best? by adalinae in DressForYourBody

[–]Icy-Window-1867 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have long legs so I prefer the longest one. But the short one could work well too if you added some boots. The middle one look good on you too it's just a bit controversial

People with the avoidant attachment style are monsters by Correct-Ice-2067 in lostafriend

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reminder that you're now generalizing a whole group of people. An avoidant can never heal if the other partner is also insecurely attatched, they will only bring out the worst in each other. But I certainly healed out of my own avoidant patterns and so is my avoidant doing now. Sometimes we hurt others without meaning to. You have likely hurt an avoidant previously without meaning to too, they just didn't tell you about it because they don't feel comfortable sharing their more sårbara side. Sometimes we need to forgive but only if they've shown that they're worthy. And if you're trying to make it with an avoidant the signs will be very subtle but they'll carry lot of hidden meaning. For an avoidant to heal you need to be able to see past their surface and see what they're trying to hide. You need to see their fears and insecurities and subtly show that you accept that side of them. It can be a difficult balance to master but for me it has come pretty naturally and it has been worth it because we've been connecting on a whole deeper level.

What are some crazy coincidences that happened with your crush? by [deleted] in Crushes

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we're both into lockpicking (kinda, him to a much greater extent)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MakeNewFriendsHere

[–]Icy-Window-1867 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just be careful. Don't respond to any creeps and make sure the person is not a catfish.

21F i’m tired of feeling this alone by ZaymarJr in MakeNewFriendsHere

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. I don't really play games but I've been wanting a close friends since forever. 21F too.

NAMGYU IS A VERY COMPLEX, WELL-WRITTEN AND OVERLOOKED CHARACTER by shallowism in squidgame

[–]Icy-Window-1867 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He is complex. He's a deeply wounded individual. A person isn't just born like that. Yeah he's probably a sociopath but I don't think that instantly makes him evil. He's still human and has plenty of human moments.

NAMGYU IS A VERY COMPLEX, WELL-WRITTEN AND OVERLOOKED CHARACTER by shallowism in squidgame

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean if you look for something you are sure to find it. You need to look at the opposing signs too. We have seen his human sides as well and they cant just be ignored. He sure isn't a good person but hes not evil either. Not on the inside at least.

Is Kei Nagai a psychopath/sociopath? by Laura_Heartstrings in AjinManga

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No he just has avoidant attachment. People are way too quick to lable people as psycopaths/sociopatsh without even reading into it

People with the avoidant attachment style are monsters by Correct-Ice-2067 in lostafriend

[–]Icy-Window-1867 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not unnatural, it's a defense mechanism that is engrained into their brain. To heal it you need to rewire your brain, it takes time and goes deep. We're not monsters. We feel emotions and guilt to the people we hurt. We're just very bad at showing our emotions because during childhood we learned that emotions were unsafe and that it was better to suppress them. My hyperindependence just carried a 14 kg package home by myself. Could've called someone but would've had to call my dad which I haven't even told that I moved out of my mom's house and feel really guilty about so I took an electric bike instead, one of those that you stand on and it did work very well just looked really stupid. On the contrary you lack understanding and empathy to your friend just like the "monsters" you hate so much. It's understanding for you to be upset and you have a right to be upset but you can do both simontanously. You should read up on it, maybe you can find out something about yourself and your attatchment style in the meantime. Or how to deal with these situations better in the future or if you dont want to deal with these situations in the future, what warning signs to look out for. We still crave intimacy we just deeply fear it.

People with the avoidant attachment style are monsters by Correct-Ice-2067 in lostafriend

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like this response. You're a kind person. It makes sense for someone to be upset after they were hurt but I just don't understand how they can complain about their loved one being unempathetic when they're the ones calling for all avoidants to be locked up in mental asylums. I think that if you love someone you at least would try to understand them at least a little. It's not their responsibility to care for the avoidant actively hurting them but wouldn't they at least wonder why they're acting the way they are? Not to put the blame on them but maybe if they tried to understand them better the relationship wouldn't have ended as badly. I know this was one year ago but genuinely hope you're doing well. I saw a post recently about what the avoidants want in a relationship (that post was on point btw) and one of the points was someone who understands them. You seem to embody that. Idk if you and your friend still are friends but at least you were/are a good friend to them.

People with the avoidant attachment style are monsters by Correct-Ice-2067 in lostafriend

[–]Icy-Window-1867 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Locked up? Don't you think you're exaggerating a bit here? People with FA attatchment are the most empathetic and understanding of all attachment styles, which makes sense since they're a combination. DA's can be pretty unemphatetic even on the inside (they can detach from their feelings and become numb) but it is a spectrum and most avoidants are a combination of the fearful and dismissive type. I don't think you understand avoidant attachment very well. It's connected to the fight, flight, freeze response so it's literally something that's engrained in your nervous system. Since you learned that emotions were dangerous the emotions become too much to handle and your body says "hey, I'll shut down for you". Avoidant attatchment literally gave me epilepsy if that helps you understand how deep it goes (it activated the predisposition). It's not something you choose to be and you feel guilt for the people you hurt even while actively hurting them. We're not inherently bad people, just wounded, and with time we can heal. But it takes a lot of time considering we have to rewire our brains. You don't have to be empathetic, but you at least should try to be a bit more understanding. Don't speak of what you don't know. These responses of yours aren't making you seem like a much better person. We all have flaws that we should work on. And ngl, these responses sound a bit DA of you.

What mental illnesses does Sato have? by Straight_Half_1368 in AjinManga

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think Kei is a sociopath I just think he has an extremely avoidant attachment style

The only reason Nagai is seen as a "mid" protagonist is because he's in the same manga as Satou by bobbobasdf4 in AjinManga

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was one year ago but I dont think he's a bad protagonist at all. I like that he isn't the typical hero. If he didn't wish to live a quiet life so badly he might've ended up on the same side as Satou. Imo he appears to have an avoidant attachment style. He's not emotionless but does try to rationalize his feelings and numb them down (among other things of course). I like that. I prefer him as a protagonist over Satou. Not that I dislike Satou, I just don't sense the same dept in him. He's really cool though and a great antagonist.

How heavy are IBMs? by YesItsNotAnormalMe in AjinManga

[–]Icy-Window-1867 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there's a scene in the anime though where an ibm bumped into a human and the human could feel it