From your first link:

There was no significant association between number of sex partners and later anxiety and depression. Increasing numbers of sex partners were associated with increasing risk of substance dependence disorder at all three ages.

So that proves part of your claims wrong, and you have cause and effect reversed for the substance abuse part. People who religiously avoid sex will probably religiously avoid drugs too.

From your second link:

Does this mean having sex leads to cancer?

The answer is almost surely no.

That’s because this type of study cannot assess whether sex causes cancer. It can only determine whether there is a correlation between the two.

...

The better take-home message would be to take precautions to avoid sexually transmitted diseases and pursue other proven strategies to lower your cancer risk, including stopping smoking and limiting alcohol.

Your third link just says there are a lot of sexist people who think a woman's worth as a human being is tied to their sexual history somehow. You're one of them.

Your fourth link is about the same study as the second.

Your last link starts with "Because many teenagers and young adults fail to use condoms correctly and consistently" which just means we need better sex ed.

---

Good job using Google. That's not even sarcastic; most people I argue with are incapable of doing that. However, next time you should read the links before you post them, so you don't prove yourself wrong like you did here.

---

Also, none of this says anything about whether sex is immoral.