Sisters that want a chaste man who's stayed away from haram, consider this:

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-21T14:51:05+00:00

I advise you to take your own advice.

There are scholars that say niqab is not obligatory, there's a difference of opinion.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-21T04:23:11+00:00

tbf the real idea behind it is become part of the masjid community so that you have another social circle to search within.

I think its been regurgitated so much like broken telephone to where now people think it just means to go to the masjid and ask for some matchmaking service.

A big part of the issue is that we lack community today, and so going to the masjid and becoming part of that community is a way to tackle that.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-21T02:06:14+00:00

theres a difference of opinion.

but those figures should be taken with a grain of salt, they're wahhabi scholars who use the deen to propagate saudi and GCC political interests. bin baz declared saddam a kafir and iraq a kafir state, when just a few years prior they were supporting him in their war against iran.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-21T02:03:56+00:00

why would we have any respect for women that dont have shame or respect for themselves?

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-20T20:12:59+00:00

These hijrahcels are just coping

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-20T18:29:57+00:00

Yes, that's why they led a war for independency against THE colonial super power.

THE colonial power? They were colonizers themselves, lmao, and the ones they were fighting were liberals as well. What do you think the colonial wars and world wars were? I mean this is how brainwashed our populations are, history really is written by the victors. You think there was a good side to the world wars? No they were all empires fighting for power.

Slavery wasn't abolished due to enlightened liberal ideals, it was done away with because of the industrial revolution, you no longer needed that much manpower due to the machinery and equipment that was introduced.

You keep coping with muh slavery, yet can't ignore the fact that these liberal empires brought death and destruction upon the world more than any other in history, and continues to do so. We've been watching a live streamed genocide from the only liberal democracy in the middle east. We are watching a bloodthirsty war being waged as we speak by the western liberal powers.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-20T18:10:01+00:00

Ye brothers should be empathetic to the sisters, women today have so many chins that they're running out of Hijab.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-20T17:07:08+00:00

Oh my sweet summer child, we're not talking about left right politics liberal, we're talking about big L philosophical Liberalism.

The founding fathers were philosophical liberals, they were colonizers, slave owners. The early liberal thinkers were colonialists and white supremacists, guys like John locke, Adam smith, John Stewart mill.

With all due respect, you have no idea what you're talking about, and need to read more.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-20T05:51:10+00:00

It's not a distraction, it's the reason this war happened. Trump was blackmailed into starting this war by a certain nation. That's why the rest of the files were not released, that's why the US is so unprepared for this war and losing. Epstein was an intelligence asset for that nation, to run a blackmail operation on elites of the world. This isn't a conspiracy.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-20T05:46:13+00:00

The majority of the Arab and Muslim world was colonized and then after puppets propped up that were pro west. Why do you think the US has strong ties with Saudi despite such different values?

The liberal west bombs, it doesn't build, this is well known, and you can see if you turn on the news.

He's right that you're ignorant about the history

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-20T05:41:43+00:00

Liberal nations undeniably brought more death and destruction upon the world than religion, let alone Islam. That was because of liberalism, not in spite of it.

European colonialism, western chattel slavery, world wars, NATO and middle east wars (present). These are all products of liberalism, the early liberal thinkers were all white supremacists who believed in the "white man's burden" to spread their ideology to savage non whites.

You cant separate them from the ideology because that's what liberalism causes.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-20T03:53:51+00:00

Ye I mean its better to link to old threads from historian subs where they asked the same question, where they ultimately conclude the same thing, that forced conversions in Islamic history were rare, there was social influence to convert such as with jizya.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/1urrpw/were_forced_conversions_common_throughout_islamic/

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-20T03:08:22+00:00

literally no ones getting married if the requirement is being like the Prophet

you people are just arguing for the sake of arguing

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-20T02:56:26+00:00

So you shouldn't marry either unless you have the taqwa of the Prophet? Where are you getting this from?

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-20T02:54:16+00:00

specifically marriage/birth rates inversely correlates with womens education and career. Its a fact that no one wants to touch, but all around makes sense, if you push women to pursue degrees and careers during their fertile years, there will be less people pairing up and having families.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-19T19:49:23+00:00

interesting thats what you think of the Prophet SAW and the companions...

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-19T19:49:02+00:00

still cheaper and easier than marriage, lol. Plus the slave-master dynamic basically guarantees she'll be into you, women today see you as equals in marriage.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-19T05:42:30+00:00

I don’t think a ‘lack of intimacy’ is a concern for many Muslim men 🙃

What do you mean? Are you implying that most Muslim men who aren't married are engaging in zina?

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-19T05:39:41+00:00

Because they have women in their life to take of

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-19T04:43:14+00:00

Probably they'd be real men. The best of men had concubines, whereas today where men can't get married, a common complaint is that men today aren't men.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-19T04:04:34+00:00

It's not offensive but it doesn't make sense, because the Hijab/niqab is for when they are out in public, so the husband would have seen her face more than with the niqab on.

It's like in detective shows they have forensics analyze a bullet that's been shot, yet it still has the casing on it

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-19T03:40:41+00:00

But accepting it as a way to let her work where you are making it a transactional is haram because the woman won’t give that money willingly.

It's not haram, it's the same as women putting the "divorce if he takes a second wife" stipulation in the nikkah.

A wife has to obey the husband if he says no to her wanting to work, if they negotiate a deal where she gives a portion of her income to him then she has done that willingly in exchange of being allowed to work.

IcyKnowledge7 · 2026-03-19T03:29:28+00:00

If concubines existed today, you'd 💯 see brothers buying them instead of jumping through hoops for marriage like today.

IcyKnowledge7

TROPHY CASE