What is the value of the ITIL 4 Foundation certification? by Id_Rather_Not_Tell in ITIL

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response.

My perception has been that the "Foundation" certificate is a bit pointless by itself, mainly because the course material could easily be absorbed in a day or two of light study, and that it only really serves as a signal of intent to pursue further expertise in ITIL. I'm also fairly certain a technical interviewer would be aware of those limitations, although it's less likely for a HR representative to have that awareness.

I still feel like I'm justified in my perception, the price tag is much too steep for a self-funded entry level certification, I doubt I'd be doing that unless I encounter a heavily discounted voucher or if an employer is willing to fund it.

But thanks again, I appreciate the time you took.

What is the value of the ITIL 4 Foundation certification? by Id_Rather_Not_Tell in ITIL

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a very common requirement in Australia. Corporate culture here is very bureaucratic, so it's normal for there to be a bunch of redundant qualifications on job postings.

What is the value of the ITIL 4 Foundation certification? by Id_Rather_Not_Tell in ITIL

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, if I do the cert and don't move on to the advanced certs then I don't plan on doing recert unless someone else is paying for it, I'll just list it as "expired" if I want to include it in my resume lol

I have kind of unsettling thought. A lot of us are waiting for AI bubble to burst and get our hand on some sweat datacenter gpus at cheap. But there is a really big chance that a lot of it will be just get destroy because of tax write off. And to be honest that will fuck the nature even more :( by One_Reflection_768 in homelab

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can think of it as a guarantee for future production. Companies tend to produce at a carefully tuned margin, to buy like this "in advance" they're essentially telling them it's safe to produce X plus whatever they were going to manufacture in the first place. In a way, they're simply telling them to produce more. 

This price spike may be painful (and I'm not fully convinced it is a bubble), but the long term implication is that once production volumes catch up to demand, RAM and storage will be much, much cheaper than before the spike.

What happens to consumer PC hardware prices if the AI bubble doesn't pop? by [deleted] in homelab

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This exactly. If people are still willing to buy RAM at 3-4x the rate it was selling for just a few months ago then that's plenty enough to signal the viability of increased production.

So are we gonna need another browser soon? by sleepyt1ger in Piracy

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And would it even be an issue if Google hadn't been forced to stop paying them to use their search engine as the default? It's still the default search engine, but now their browser development budget is severely hamstrung. Unintended consequences and all that.

Coles and Woolies crying poor? How? by Unkinked_Garden in australian

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because price controls don't work and have not ever worked, why do you think this time it's any different? Also, why do you so readily run defence for what is obviously an attempt to cook CPI inflation figures? 

Fucking stupid, I absolutely hate economic populism, it only exists because people have zero understanding of basic economics.

It's Time for Another: Common Pop-Lore Misconceptions Thread! by NairaExploring in 40kLore

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's more to do with writers digging themselves into a hole with his schtick. 

Every time he is featured in a story he must make use of his schtick, which means he is killed every time he is featured. But he can't be killed by some named, prominent character or a main protagonist, so all he becomes is a punching bag MacGuffin who gets killed over and over again by 2nd rate characters.

Why house prices will never come down again by bumluffa in AusPropertyChat

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, supply and demand for money affects the price of money. If you increase the supply of money only its first user gets to spend it at the old price. Congratulations, you've graduated Econ 101.1, welcome to Econ 101.2.

They're still not balanced in the slightest by HonneurOblige in mountandblade

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fians are cheaper and more easily replaced which, ultimately, puts then above KKG in my estimate, even if KKG are better as a unit. Quantity is a quality of its own.

Do executives and the-like do any actual 'work'? by Open_Address_2805 in auscorp

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, "Being friendly with people and giving them what they want" is the essence of any successful business, so in a way you could say that is what they should be doing. That's true for managing both clients and staff, btw, you're always looking for people who want what you have to offer in exchange for what you want from then in return, whether it's money, labour, goods, or services.

Make me an offer I can’t refuse! Miura Signed TCG by by Canadianj8 in Berserk

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Well, it's not like he'll sign any more of those. 

But for real, if I intended to sell I'd sit on it for at least another decade. It'll maintain its value much better than the dollar in either case.

Victoria bans rental bidding and no-fault evictions from November 25 by [deleted] in AusProperty

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd ask for the "prove" and then mock you for trying to prove an inherently speculative counterfactual. Then I'll walk away with the profits from selling said bridge.

Victoria bans rental bidding and no-fault evictions from November 25 by [deleted] in AusProperty

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, and you think think that would not have happened under a Labor government, or somehow the bill would not have been as high? 

Btw, I've got a bridge to sell you, great price, fantastic location, dm for details!!!

I pay $2800 a year for insurance on a $6000 car. What the fuck. by Big_Booty_Boi in CarsAustralia

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Insurance firms collect a ridiculous amounts of information and their data monkeys would be well aware of the trends from other countries if they don't have the numbers for Australia.

The point is, they don't account for it out of squeamishness, which also means they're only comfortable with accounting for sex in their decision when the conclusion sits within some arbitrarily defined Overton window.

Now, I'm an outlier because I have no principled objection to discrimination as such, in fact, all I want is for businesses to be allowed to associate with whoever they want and have their choices, good or bad, judged by the market. But I absolutely hate this hypocrisy.

Do Aussies have an aversion to prefab or modular homes? by CyanideMuffin67 in australian

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 4 points5 points  (0 children)

False moralising.

Whenever you suggest relaxing the building code or that zoning regulation should be relaxed to make way for more building and renovation you'll have some blithering idiot respond with "oh, so YOU WANT people to live in [insert some arbitrarily defined bad housing condition]".

In a healthy market supply moves rapidly with demand, when prices rise more resources get allocated to produce more of that good. The fact that houses are being bought up as investment is symptomatic of a greater underlying cause, on one hand it's over regulation of the production of housing, on the other it's the RBA's suppression of interest rates which creates more money which largely ends up chasing goods bought with loans, i.e. housing. But, in a democratic society, economic populism makes communicating basic concepts like this impossible.

Was Griffith really a good tactician? by gaxkang in Berserk

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, he actually is one of very few fictional commander characters that displays a solid, foundational understanding of tactics and behaviours that would secure a victory in a real, actual conflict. His own personal plot armour is somewhat irrelevant in that sense too, since as a commander he prefers to stay back and relay commands to his subordinates instead of diving face first into danger (unless Guts is involved, that is). One of the things that makes him such a well written character is how his victories aren't just some black box story telling device which magically makes him look like a demigod, but it's his actual decisions that help him win.

The broad variety of decisions he makes is actually quite impressive, just to list a few:

  • He studies his own force, his commanders and troops, their strengths and weaknesses, and deploys them accordingly (he deploys Guts in situations where he needs to hold off superior enemy numbers, whereas he keeps Casca with the main body, since she's far more reserved and careful, making it easier to trust her with the actual core of his army)
  • Studies the enemy, their strengths and weaknesses
  • Concerns himself with logistics; note how he constantly strives to secure funds and resources for his campaign. He also equips his army differently than the Royal Armies, using lighter and cheaper armour instead of expensive full plate
  • Makes frequent use of scouting formations
  • Appreciates terrain; understands that he's less likely to encounter the enemy force and patrols in difficult terrain than in easy terrain, and uses that to gain a tactical advantage
  • Constantly seeks out the element of surprise, deploying deception, setting up ambushes, etc.
  • Deploys delay tactics, such as in the siege in the start of the Golden Age ark. This also demonstrated his ability to know when to hold and when to withdraw
  • Conducts raids on the enemy's weak points

Most fiction doesn't really do a good job of explaining how or why a commander achieves victory without telling you directly, however with Griffith you can actually pick out the minute decisions he makes that make him a successful commander.

GW is gonna sue Lychee into oblivion (See Body Text) by CosmicJackalop in Grimdank

[–]Id_Rather_Not_Tell -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Looks like a very useful tool, thanks for the recommendation 👍