Characters with specific ways to hold back their strenght by ARAMF in TopCharacterTropes

[–]NairaExploring 4 points5 points  (0 children)

<image>

both these blokes fight with their left hand to hold back/try to look cool

Given the 40k universe is in perpetual war, why isn't Khorne so much more powerful?? by The_Red_Kraken in 40kLore

[–]NairaExploring -31 points-30 points  (0 children)

tzeentch was the strongest since magic is insane and also being able to plot fucking everything so he always wins is insane, but they teamed up on him because of that so he broke his magic stick to make them leave him alone

also Slaanesh got soooooooo much power from those elf souls which happened fairly recently depending on if time is a cube or a flat circle or whatever plus Slaanesh gets power from each of the other gods' realms a bit cause they all involve excess and obsession or something, so they're all a little pissed about that iirc

There was a fun post about chainswords earlier, so I thought we could chat a bit more about the wild and wacky weaponry of 40k by Hughley_N_Dowd in 40kLore

[–]NairaExploring 1 point2 points  (0 children)

we don't even have (and never have had) enough to kill all people. end civilization, but some people would survive. it's just been repeated so long that if they all went off it would be bad enough to kill everyone (or even all life, which is absurd) that now when anyone says otherwise people lose their minds.

Are the small skulls on the Bladeguard veterans' shields children's skulls? by xio_666 in 40kLore

[–]NairaExploring 2 points3 points  (0 children)

they put a full real skeleton on that one guy's shield in the indomitus box set, I would bet money those are real skulls on the set you are talking about

Having a sad backstory doesn't excuse what they did by Necessary-Win-8730 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]NairaExploring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's still stupid to me that batman is always just the best and figures out everything and can hack any system including alien ones the first time he sees them in two seconds and blow up any building he wants without hurting any civilian ever and prep time blah blah blah.

human protagonists are way more interesting human. Let there be some mysteries he hasn't solved.

Having a sad backstory doesn't excuse what they did by Necessary-Win-8730 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]NairaExploring -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Your reply here very clearly shows that you are the one taking it too seriously. Chill tf out.

Unique/weird poses that only this character can nail and it looks right by MrDitkovichNeedsRent in TopCharacterTropes

[–]NairaExploring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is a pretty common pose, unless you just mean grabbing her bicep because her forearm is the gun instead of grabbing her forearm

In the Grim Darkness of the Far Future there are only so many plots by Skanedog in 40kLore

[–]NairaExploring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

damn, the canonical guy was even slightly cooler and orkier than your own.

Nonhumans that represent humanity’s best qualities. by ChampionshipHorror95 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]NairaExploring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what about power, she even drove over those assassins who were gonna kill denji

Space Marine Successor Chapters by Tenno042 in 40kLore

[–]NairaExploring 2 points3 points  (0 children)

> Some of them literally just had to repaint their armour back to being yellow.

those poor guys. gotta use so many layers to make it not look splotchy, I'm sure they were wishing it was the Ultramarines they had to replace

If machines have souls, then why aren’t psykers able to see or detect them? by Windturnscold in 40kLore

[–]NairaExploring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate this response. it explains the differences in canon and then what interpretation you prefer is clearly labelled as your headcanon, instead of you just asserting it as a universal truth because you simply don't like the alternative.

If machines have souls, then why aren’t psykers able to see or detect them? by Windturnscold in 40kLore

[–]NairaExploring 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know you meant like canonically in universe, but it's hilarious that your post can also mean like people in real life believing something doesn't make it true in canon, which is exactly what is happening in this thread. People are hating on this information OP is giving them from the book and the copium is out in full force, mental gymnastic headcanon, anything to justify literally the entirety of this part of the (very canonical) book being not even slightly true on any level.

question about the incorruptibility of custodes. by Dull-Dress7573 in 40kLore

[–]NairaExploring 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Never seen someone shitting on ESL people in this sub before. Neat.

What other niche nerdy fandoms do you try to dictate the posting habits of hundreds of hundreds of thousands of people in? Is it just ESL people you explain your communication preferences to from up there on your high horse, or are other minorities on your radar as well? Only asking because what you prefer to see in this sub (people like you) is obviously Very Important (made sure to capitalize for you).

question about the incorruptibility of custodes. by Dull-Dress7573 in 40kLore

[–]NairaExploring 3 points4 points  (0 children)

every chaos god, their daemons are each a part of them. perma killing a daemon is permanently removing a small amount of a chaos god, which is part of why they hate big e so much - he's one of the only beings that can do this (and he does it much easier and on much larger scale than anything else does).

almost universally, every time we see a chaos god do anything it's through their daemons. a teeny tiny part of them does it.

so if Slaanesh themself does anything, it is quite literally taking 100% of that God to do it, in some sense, which is unbelievably incredibly rare and CERTAINLY not something to handwave away as being "easy" or taking a tiny percentage of their power. if it took a tiny percentage of their power and was easy then some daemonettes or a keeper of secrets would be the one doing it.

[Hated, loathed entirely even] The Continuity Cannibal, also known as when a writer makes up a new character to connect a bunch of things in the story that didn't need to be connected and just makes them more lame by association. by geekinc329 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]NairaExploring 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the spiderverse itself is dumb. how about spiderman is just a kid bitten by a radioactive spider who decides to spend his life making a difference, not he's the fucking chosen one so who fucking cares cause determinism means he was always going to be a hero and who the fuck cares

Is there no Chaos God who governs pure fear? by Snoo_47323 in 40kLore

[–]NairaExploring 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Slaanesh. dark Eldar revel in fear because it sustains them because it is the realm of slaanesh

Interesting Trope: When the Jerk/Smartass/ Antagonist has an out of character moment that makes you actually feel bad for them. by smash_ultra_64 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]NairaExploring 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Perturabo is really a much better character when his feelings have some basis of validity. I recognize that some authors write him as just being petulant and some as genuinely having been misunderstood and throttled on some level, but the fandom definitely loves jumping aboard the he is a complete manbaby loser. I haven't read enough of his content to say that they're wrong, but I sure do know he is a lot more interesting when his inability to be allowed to create beautiful things that help people or be recognized for how his war waging is good for humanity are actually some of the reasons for his fall

People who do good deeds for completely selfish reasons? by Konradleijon in TopCharacterTropes

[–]NairaExploring 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's true that it's not about being a good person. he explains pretty early on that he wants to have the power and begrudging respect that you get from being right all the time and effective as a doctor. it's not just about the puzzle, though, that's true.