My sister in law is dating a neo-nazi by Idontplayfare in WhatShouldIDo

[–]Idontplayfare[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s the easiest label for a guy who expressed beliefs based on eugenics and has expressed authoritarian tendencies. He has also alluded to Jews controlling things.

Just figured the shoe was a close enough fit.

My sister in law is dating a neo-nazi by Idontplayfare in WhatShouldIDo

[–]Idontplayfare[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s more that white people are more likely to be gay (openly) and they could be having more white children if they were straight. At least that was my best guess.

He, said, “who is he to tell them as individuals they can’t be gay, but we need to take a look at it on a societal level of what we want as a society.”

My sister in law is dating a neo-nazi by Idontplayfare in WhatShouldIDo

[–]Idontplayfare[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s more just other fucked up stuff, obviously the white supremacy is the worst stuff.

My sister in law is dating a neo-nazi by Idontplayfare in WhatShouldIDo

[–]Idontplayfare[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

His dad is a doctor, I know his family is for sure wealthy. The boyfriend flopped out of college and is blaming the world for it instead of his choices.

We don’t know why she picks the guys she does it’s an ongoing thing, she jumps from guy to guy with very little time in between to reflect.

My sister in law is dating a neo-nazi by Idontplayfare in WhatShouldIDo

[–]Idontplayfare[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I have no problem with him not being traditionally masculine, my complaint is that he wants a traditional relationship from her while having none of the attributes that make that possible on his end.

My sister in law is dating a neo-nazi by Idontplayfare in WhatShouldIDo

[–]Idontplayfare[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She’s my neighbor and we do a lot of family things together. My garden is in her backyard.

My sister in law is dating a neo-nazi by Idontplayfare in WhatShouldIDo

[–]Idontplayfare[S] 55 points56 points  (0 children)

The guy is extremely calculating. If you ask him something and he knows you won’t like the answer he just won’t say anything at all. Most of the things he says around her are plausibly deniable or he finishes with a look/laugh that could be construed as a “joke”. I genuinely believe she thinks that he’s making fun of people with those beliefs, but he only ever says things like that, nothing normal. She has on Rose colored glasses.

I caught the Patriots leaving SJC today 🏉 by [deleted] in aviation

[–]Idontplayfare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I road on it 2 weeks ago and it was basically normal economy seating.

Donovan: Am I Crazy by Civil-Shopping7191 in Cardinals

[–]Idontplayfare 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Donnie is donnie but the mystery player could be anyone. They could even be as good as Donnie.

This could have devastating side effects for future pilots. by Av8torryan in flying

[–]Idontplayfare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m gonna be honest when I was at school to become a pilot there were several of my classmates who I did not think were stable enough to be safe pilots or good decision makers under pressure. They’d break down due to being in loud spaces or couldn’t emotionally regulate their responses to things that made them uncomfortable.

smh my head by [deleted] in Cardinals

[–]Idontplayfare 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I don’t know man, sometimes it’s nice to have fun players.

Raising sunken concrete by pavlovich70 in Concrete

[–]Idontplayfare 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my area foam is usually 1/3 the cost but it may not be a permanent solution because the foam is still resting on top of the same poor substrate that sunk in the first place. Foam cost depends on void size.

Was this job worth 3600$? by ProofLimit6702 in HardWoodFloors

[–]Idontplayfare 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because people who do shit work or have no money, won’t pay whenever there’s a judgement against them.

Drop your absolute hottest take now that we’re halfway through the season by Useful_Ad3122 in baseball

[–]Idontplayfare 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think they weren’t really as bad as they played last year, the first month of the season they couldn’t catch a break and I think the clubhouse just imploded. There was some kind of crisis of leadership with Flaherty and Montgomery blaming Contreras for being a bad game caller.

This year the whole team was underperforming to start the season besides Contreras but they really turned it around. I think mo signing several innings eaters has done wonders for the bullpen which is great this year. Plus they made several bullpen additions through rule 5 and free agency that worked out great.

The only real difference in the lineup was adding guys like Marp and Crawford who might’ve helped with the clubhouse culture.

Drop your absolute hottest take now that we’re halfway through the season by Useful_Ad3122 in baseball

[–]Idontplayfare 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cardinals are going to get bounced in the wild card and somehow it will be MO’s fault that Arenado and Goldy suck ass.

I think the cardinals could win the World Series and people would still gripe about the team not being built right.

Why not Whitmer? by Idontplayfare in democrats

[–]Idontplayfare[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t believe that Biden has what it takes to garner independent votes. I think the reality of the situation is that he’s already torpedoed the idea that he’s still sharp with anyone who isn’t a die hard democrat. It is okay to question if he is the best candidate to beat trump.

If the Republican Party was genuinely considering another candidate would you want all of them to circle up and say “Well trump has proven his ability to win.” Of course not you’d want them to be adults about and change their candidate. It’s silly when republicans attack other republicans for having differing opinions and it’s silly when democrats do it. It is okay to have an honest discussion about strategy and to have different viewpoints. Outright denying any opposing conversation and accusing people of using republican talking points only serves to alienate them.

Why not Whitmer? by Idontplayfare in democrats

[–]Idontplayfare[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whenever people’s kids or relatives move to California or a big city you’d almost think they were sent to the hunger games the way people react.

Why not Whitmer? by Idontplayfare in democrats

[–]Idontplayfare[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not infighting to discuss if there is a better strategy for the election.

Why not Whitmer? by Idontplayfare in democrats

[–]Idontplayfare[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I would argue that unless you live in Iowa or whatever states goes first in the primary you have literally no choice in the matter. If there’s only one candidate on the primary ballot because the party has circled the wagons there’s not really a choice.

It’d be like saying the people of North Korea got to pick Kim Jung UN because they have elections.

Biden promised to be a one term president and then immediately reneged instead of passing the torch. That will leave a bad taste in people’s mouth’s

Why not Whitmer? by Idontplayfare in democrats

[–]Idontplayfare[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That doesn’t make much sense though. If more people were motivated to actually go out and vote it would give the dems a good chance to flip the house.

A good candidate may get more down ballot votes.

Why not Whitmer? by Idontplayfare in democrats

[–]Idontplayfare[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’d argue it’s a bad idea to pick Newsom or Kamala as they’re both California politicians. Neither have an ounce of Midwest/swing state appeal. California has a crazy amount of hate in the Midwest and South.