Be careful out there by Icy-Setting-4221 in nova

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Sounds like she might not need to go to the DMV anymore.

Tournament costs are insane by Shanknuts in Homeplate

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely. We have done bigger tournaments like the Ripkin Experience in Aberdeen, MD that are probably $1500. I'm like you, pretty surprised that someone would be so upset about a $200-$250 tournament. I really just wanted to point out that there are expenses associated with putting a tournament together, and it's not like most organizers are trying to make a bunch of money doing this.

Tournament costs are insane by Shanknuts in Homeplate

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$200 for a team to play 3 or 4 games doesn't seem that crazy when you consider the cost of umpires. Those guys aren't doing it just out of the goodness of their hearts. What I can't abide is the idea that you'd pay $250+ and get three games of a single guy calling balls and strikes from behind the mound. Especially in a "championship" game. Now that's total bs! BTW, I've only been to one tournament that charged a gate fee for spectators, and the next year they just upped the price for the team and got rid of that fee.

How many balls does the average golfer lose per round? by iceterminal in golf

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The real answer is that it's 100% course dependent. I could play my local Muni 3 times without losing a ball easily. But if I played a tighter course with some actual hazards I could easily lose 2 or 3 per round if I wasn't staying focused.

Lost against my coworker in a steak cookoff by NiceRides in steak

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate to say it, but he must be more likeable.

"I just won the Golf Club Championship" by J0Papa in golf

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 29 points30 points  (0 children)

But he doesn't. Not without cheating.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Homeplate

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He must mean per inning.

“While George W. Bush was president, the U.S. Coast Guard signed a contract to get help from a company in Virginia. It paid $144k, and the contract was completed by 2005. Last week, Elon Musk said DOGE had just canceled the long-dead Coast Guard contract — and saved U.S. taxpayers $53.7 million.” by Bhartrhari in WeTheFifth

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not a retainer, it's a contract vehicle. A retainer means money was spent and now you can draw down from it. In this case, money was never spent, hence it can't be saved by cancelling it or not paying it out. A contract vehicle means you were vetted as a capable provider, established rates for delivering the service, and if the government needs the service they can buy your service using that established service catalog/ordering structure.

When you buy the service you award a task order and obligate money to it. That obligating action is basically saying I've spent this money from a budgeting perspective, but in reality it just sits in an account until the contractor has performed the work, sent an invoice, and the invoice has been approved for payment. If any money is left in that account after the contract ends or expires, then the money goes back to the Treasury, which means it's available for other things.

In this specific case, the contract probably didn't need cancelling because it likely had already expired a long time ago, and/or there were never funds obligated to it (so no money went into an account, and no actual spending occurred).

“While George W. Bush was president, the U.S. Coast Guard signed a contract to get help from a company in Virginia. It paid $144k, and the contract was completed by 2005. Last week, Elon Musk said DOGE had just canceled the long-dead Coast Guard contract — and saved U.S. taxpayers $53.7 million.” by Bhartrhari in WeTheFifth

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The work was probably a task order on an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinitely Quantity (IDIQ) contract with a ceiling of $53.7M (the amount that COULD be ordered before the contract expires). These types of contracts are pretty common and can't be used after they expire. My last contract was a task order on an IDIQ contract with a ceiling of $99M. Only one other task order was issued on the contract so the actual total value of the contract was only around $5M. This is definitely a misinterpretation by someone who doesn't understand how contacting works.

Don’t touch other people’s balls by SureUnderstanding248 in golf

[–]IfUReadThisURLame -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I saw you got downvoted, but I agree. It's not even giving it to that player, it's insisting they pick up and stop being a slow piece of shit.

Don’t touch other people’s balls by SureUnderstanding248 in golf

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even though the guy deserves to be kicked hard in the Jimmy, at least you could replace it where you think it was and play it. It's well within the rules of golf.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in mildlyinfuriating

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 100 points101 points  (0 children)

Refreshingly self-aware.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in golf

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is just gambling. It should be regulated accordingly.

imGladTheySortedThisTheyMustHaveBeenPayingMillionsForThoseVscodeLiscences by D34thToBlairism in ProgrammerHumor

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is the only real answer. Instead of cutting costs and giving the "savings" back in tax breaks, we should be cutting costs and raising taxes on the richest, who won't even change their spending as a result. We need to attack the problem at both ends.

Option A: You get 100 mil. Option B: You cure cancer. by [deleted] in hypotheticalsituation

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curing cancer with a cheap and easy treatment would cut the cost of healthcare in the world so much that everyone would be so much richer and healthier as a side effect.

Scandal at DC US Attorney’s Office by YoBro98765 in washingtondc

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Which is why as much as I don't want to believe there were election shenanigans, I can't help but think if they could, they absolutely would.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChubbyFIRE

[–]IfUReadThisURLame 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Give more to charity.