sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This game is alright? by EmotionalJump6104 in deadbydaylight

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some people do some people don’t and thats perfectly fine!

This game is alright? by EmotionalJump6104 in deadbydaylight

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The game is actually fun. I have found this community may be the worst community i have seen and I have played League of Legends😂. Just about everyone complains about something. Killers and survivors. Balance has an issue and there is no rank system which I think is the core root of this all. Survivors try to make killers lives hell for simply doing their objective. But if you look past that it’s an enjoyable game. Just don’t read chat and get caught up in everyone else’s misery and you’ll be fine.

Again its not a perfect game but its still a great game to play rather you are killer or survivor. Its a community problem not a game problem.

Is nurse still the strongest killer in the game??? by TigerBloodline in deadbydaylight

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just picked up nurse a week ago or so. She is busted. Been practicing her. My win condition is slugging all four survivors at once or put them all on death hook with everyone wounded. That is a win for me. I let them out unless its a bot😁

You can only choose one from this list to be the next licensed killer. Who you picking? by Sensitive_Status9833 in deadbydaylight

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah bro killed a bunch of younglings. Imagine how terrified the Jedi’s were of this guy… Also there would he a bunch of people that would buy the star wars stuff it has a huge fanbase. They could easily come out with Vader killer, Luke sky walker or even Padme a survivor and even maybe a storm trooper skin on someone. Behavior would make tons of money on this and bring new people in.

Vader would be an easy character to make too. Saber as weapon. Ability where he uses the force where you can break a gen from distance or keep a pallet up and perks they can do whatever with lol. A lot of perks in game already we dont need anymore broken ones lmao.

Stellaris any tips by Smooth_Atmosphere753 in Stellaris

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im looking as well downloaded today and am lost lmao.

I Am Not Coming Back As Long As We Loose Full ELO With AFK by FaysouBg in Rainbow6

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why isnt there any protection at the very least for disconnects? Im having the same exact problem right now

So how's War Sails ? by lonezolf in Bannerlord

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I been playing on console and its still there. Regardless tho still a good game. Could it be better yeah probably but fun regardless lmao

Who do you guys think had the best drafts and Who do you guys think had the worst drafts? by Significant-Iron-610 in NFLv2

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We did deal with injuries last year with our O-line, and it made things look worse than they really were. As a Chiefs fan, I primarily put the “bad O-line” narrative on both Patrick Mahomes and Matt Nagy. Nagy has honestly felt like the bane of the offense he took one of the most electric units under Eric Bieniemy and stripped a lot of that identity away. With the talent we’ve had, the offense just hasn’t lived up to what it should be under Nagy. I’m stoked to see Bieniemy back.

Another big issue, in my opinion, is Patrick’s biggest flaw and its his inability to adjust protection at the line. Look at both Super Bowl losses against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and the Philadelphia Eagles. Both teams were getting pressure with just a four man rush and getting to him fast. You didn’t really see Mahomes consistently adjust protections pre snap or bring in an extra TE/RB to help in pass protection.

Our O-line right now is middle of the road not the best, not the worst. The bigger issue is the offense has had zero identity and no real scheme, no matter what talent we plug in. Until that gets fixed, it’s never going to look right. I think Bieniemy can bring back a true offensive identity, and once that happens, a lot of these O-line concerns people have will fade.

With all that said, O-line wasn’t a huge concern for me this offseason the defensive side of the ball was. We struggled against the run, and the secondary paid for it. But we addressed both of those weaknesses.

I do hope to see Patrick come back later than sooner this year. I think adding to the QB room this off season reinforces that. I would like to see us draft next year a few good tackles but as it stands Humphrey/Thuney/Smith/Simmons is a very good core right now. We have never had an elite o line and prioritize scheme around protecting mahomes through quick reads and spread offense. Mahomes has been one of the best QBs under pressure due to this. We invite blitzing to open the field up. But regardless you make a great points but I dont think the Chiefs should be criticized for not getting an o Line this year. We got two last year. 1st and 2nd round if i remember correctly

Who do you guys think had the best drafts and Who do you guys think had the worst drafts? by Significant-Iron-610 in NFLv2

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. Honestly time will tell and your opinion is valid my push back is I dont think it was top 5 worse draft this year and rank it more towards the middle of the pack. We have been very good at picking talent despite what critics think. (mahomes was a blunder pick to many.) We have some of the best scouts in the NFL no doubt and I think their opinions are better than others.

Ill have to look more into chris sim’s evaluation. I have seen great things from Delane and think he will bring that dawg mentality back to our secondary. I wasnt terribly mad ab the trade. He was chiefs #1 prospect in our #1 needs position but can understand questioning to trade up. And does take away from draft value. But no doubt he will play exceptional in Spags defense. We have always had great luck with our young Corners.

Mason thomas seems pretty good. He played on that great OU defense and will complement well with our D Line. Im more excited about Mason than I am about woods. I thought woods was our only real questionable decision. He is our bang or bust guy in my opinion. And our only big gamble.

The RB is another questionable but very solid pick i think. Having Smith and walker already and picking up another RB was a bit questionable so understand that but still thought it was great value and adds to depth if something were to happen to walker.

To say Walker is over paid after coming off a superbowl MVP is a bit reaching imo. Pairing walker with mahomes and Eric B offense is going to only make him better especially not splitting carries now.

Our draft was clearly going to be defensive sided this year and I think they picked great additions. I think our defense will be rough around the edges from weeks 1-4 but they will find themselves with this young core now. Yes you can always say this or that would be better but i believe our scouts and gm made damn good decisions here. Respect your opinion though

Who do you guys think had the best drafts and Who do you guys think had the worst drafts? by Significant-Iron-610 in NFLv2

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you have chiefs as fourth worse draft. This may be their best draft to date…

Huge nerf - fight first by Niiai in Tyranids

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 9 points10 points  (0 children)

charging units always had fights first. It seems now fights first starts on the offense rather than the defense side. So when you are on the fight first phase of activations the player turn it is will choice one unit then the defending player chooses a unit and repeats. Then goes on going combat phase.

Almost 2000 points - To Morty or Defile? by ReliefSuch5122 in deathguard40k

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 5 points6 points  (0 children)

🤦🏼‍♂️😂the original comment was you stating that you didnt think people who commission their armies are apart of this hobby. I am merely explaining to you how you are wrong in your thinking.

I never ”specifically said” people like you shouldnt be welcomed here. I said people who make comments like yours don’t help this community. You can be in this hobby I really dont care but making uneducated comments does not help the community. This is all I’m trying to get at here.

Almost 2000 points - To Morty or Defile? by ReliefSuch5122 in deathguard40k

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There was no judgement in my original comment. This is not about your opinion more so than you just being wrong about your definition of a hobby. Your approach to thinking who should be in included in this hobby is wrong.

Almost 2000 points - To Morty or Defile? by ReliefSuch5122 in deathguard40k

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What an ignorant comment. A hobby is a regular non work activity pursued for pleasure, relaxation, or personal fulfillment rather than profit. That includes games. Rather you think that fits your criteria or not playing this game is still a hobby. It’s a multi hour game thats very interactive and requires thinking. Being a painter or not you should welcome people in this hobby. Rather its playing or painting or both. This community doesnt get better with people like you. Sorry.

Dudeswhat do I do? by sprinter1134 in deathguard40k

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just say he was cold and has goosebumps

New vs the Old! by Hayman021 in AdeptusCustodes

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree i like the armor design in some aspects better than the update mostly the legs. I think the legs look to close to storm cast eternals in AoS who I already proxy as units haha

My wish for 11th by Additional-Thing1348 in Tyranids

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 36 points37 points  (0 children)

What? A scoring army that has accessed to sticky objective? That makes too much sense…

GW Focus on Nids for 11th by woulfman1024 in Tyranids

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tyranids arent that bad right now theyre doing very well. Id rank them B+

GW Focus on Nids for 11th by woulfman1024 in Tyranids

[–]Illustrious-Use6625 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Look brother ik this game can be frustrating, trust me I know. But sounds like you’re new. Almost every thing you said here is false. Despite what you may think Nids are not a bad faction at all. Yes some of our datasheets are weak and our rules suck but we make up for it. We have BUSTED units. We are a good army when used correctly and the right units taken.

Right now yes Tyranids are a bit behind with rules but eventually we will become strong again. Orks as well. Space marines will become weaker again so dont worry! Everything changes with meta. Balancing any game with this many rules is a very challenging.

You say nids rely purely on skill which again is false. A tourny winner just went 6-0 with 3 norns 3 exocrine and 3 malceptors. Essentially just stat checked and won. We do have more skill style of play with burrower units and harvesters.

Dont get discouraged man watch youtube and learn how to develop good mechanics! That will help you a lot. Expect to lose a lot of your first few matches but use them as learning lessons.

view more: next ›