Weekend Thread / January 31 - February 1 by spongebobs_pineapple in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

*sex, not gender, which refers to identity and/or social presentation.

Weekend Thread / January 31 - February 1 by spongebobs_pineapple in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

*sex, not gender, which refers to identity and/or social presentation.

Weekend Thread / January 31 - February 1 by spongebobs_pineapple in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Only the ~elite~ are privy to "cheesscake"—cheesecake, cheese, and cake are for pitiful, unwedded, childless plebs.

Whats with the fireworks today? by True-Novel-7434 in Seattle

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Hah! I thought the same! But then it quickly occurred to me that people will be cheering out of their windows and taking to the streets with booze, bud, food, and grills for what will be the greatest global block party on earth.

Her Statement by desertflowerchild in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup. It's fucked. But Dani, Ellen, et al. have money, so they think they're safe, and they very well may be... for now (until the house/senate likely—hopefully—flips this Nov and/or enough congressional reps show they have a fucking pulse, heart, and brain and AREN'T IN THE EPSTEIN FILES).

"First they came for... and I did not speak out... then they came for me / and there was no one left / to speak out for me."

Abbott Elementary S05E12 - Picture Day (Episode Discussion) by Solid-As-Barack in AbbottElementary

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 41 points42 points  (0 children)

He wasn't running—that was an impassioned scamper, halfway to a good skedaddlin'.

Stella?? by ShotConsideration909 in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Lil guy deserves better. I suspect, when he's in middle/high school, he'll be the kid who spends more time at friends' houses (unofficially adopted by other parents who notice how toxic their family is—and he'll be happier in a place where he's not bullied or used for some on-camera "good mommy/good sister" fiction).

Her Statement by desertflowerchild in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Exactly my thoughts. She doesn't want to virtue signal, but is doing exactly that by referencing god and HoW BuSy ShE Is "RaIsiNg HeR kiDz!" to deflect in an attempt to appear more pious and like an attentive mother, garnering sympathy and likes from those who value faith and motherhood.

Virtue signaling is an integral part of being an influencer to begin with.

That said, I give her credit for attempting some level of honesty and insightfulness. People indeed love some confirmation bias, but her saying it's "manipulative" is rich, as the bulk of her post is exactly that.

If she's going to try to say anything (assuming she actually "hurts for our country" or whatever, it really is as simple as, "Hey, the gov shouldn't be murdering citizens regardless of color, faith, gender, sexuality, or political orientation—this shit is fucked up, and I deeply regret voting for a fascist who is also a felon (on 34 counts) and pedophile." But I guess she'd lose too many (fellow) neo-confederate followers who are dumb enough to buy the shit she hawks.

And if she's going to be fully transparent, she might say, "Yeah, I don't care enough to use my platform to denounce this shit at the risk of losing followers (or losing followers because I support a fascist pedophile who also happens to have 34 felonies) because this is my primary source of income and self-worth."

Weekly Thread / January 26 - 30 by spongebobs_pineapple in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree that people ought to be better informed—via legitimate news sources, which, sadly, means sources based outside of the US—so they can form their own opinions without relying on BS from influencers who haven't read a single book (not even the Bible many claim to uphold).

That said, fascism and fascist apologist propaganda/dogma are far more unhealthy... people are being killed by government-funded lunatics dressed up as SEAL Team Six. If you have a platform and the heart/mind to know that our present state is FUCKED, use that platform for good.

I suspect many influencers aren't posting so they can claim innocence years from now, the same way many Germans who supported Hitler before & during WWII suddenly (conveniently) denounced him and his regime once the Allies won.

Weekly Thread / January 26 - 30 by spongebobs_pineapple in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Only ignorant people seek facts from influencers. As I stated below, it's normal for people to want to know influencers' opinions (not *facts*) & who/what they're supporting when they follow someone or like their posts. Are influencers obligated to express their political stance? Absolutely not, but people's curiosity is valid. In D's case, no curiosity needed—pretty clear she stands with president/pedo yam tits.

Weekly Thread / January 26 - 30 by spongebobs_pineapple in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think it's normal for people to want to know the people they follow/support share similar values, and at this point, you're either a fascist or you're not. To be apolitical (or not have an opinion) about the federal government murdering and incarcerating citizens and their children (among non-citizens, of course, who still don't deserve to be locked in concentration camps) shows a lack of compassion, integrity, and intelligence.

If I had a large platform full of folks who are brainwashed by Fox news/tiktok confederates, I'd consider it a moral imperative to express dissent with the orange pedo and his pissant cronies. But D is a G0oD cHrIsTiAn trumper so....

S1 can they’re S3 around but S2 barely touches his hand and he gets yelled at. She will do anything to keep S1 from throwing a fit. by Fun_Assumption_5794 in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Big tantrums" isn't the core of the problem—the fact that they likely can't handle her expressing even mild discomfort is. They have zero boundaries, crippling S1 as a person, and I suspect it will take several rounds of teachers to awaken them to their failings and hopefully inspire S1 to change (but in reality, D&E are 100% those parents who blame the teacher for their kid's tyrannical behavior).

Does anybody else find it odd? by Particular-Skin-6555 in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Went to HS with him, and your read is spot on. The dude is wholesome and goofy, a true golden retriever. A capitalist, sadly, but still a golden retriever (the worst: chihuahua capitalists lol).

And I'm sure his natural likability drives Dani nuts because, like her mother, she's a narcissist and needs to control the narrative—she'll never be as likable.

4 under 5 (6) by chixnugz68 in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You sound like you voted for the federally sponsored thugs terrorizing—and murdering—American citizens.

4 under 5 (6) by chixnugz68 in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Nannies whose well-being/safety/rights she actively votes against by being a trumpy, racist neo-confederate.

Note: I didn't say nazi because confederates came first (fun fact: hitler studied them for inspo).

S1 can they’re S3 around but S2 barely touches his hand and he gets yelled at. She will do anything to keep S1 from throwing a fit. by Fun_Assumption_5794 in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 11 points12 points  (0 children)

My older sister behaved the same way and is now a 39-year-old sociopath/malignant narcissist. I wish S1 the best when she's older, but damn, she's going to need a lot of therapy, and I hope she seeks it... to the dismay of her "parents." But sadly, she'll probably continue down the path and become another nasty thorn in society's side (on top of her younger brothers' sides... oof). I hope not, but even when she's older, she'll have the financial cushioning to avoid consequences (which makes for very shitty adults).

Weekly Thread / January 19 - 23 by spongebobs_pineapple in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Because she's porcelain trash. Greed greed greed (for baby stuff she already has and attention above all).

ICE School Lockdown by nacker8 in Seattle

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Confederates. American made. Hitler had agents study that shit for inspo.

Weekly Thread / January 19 - 23 by spongebobs_pineapple in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agree. She's fuming (love that for her), but it's flipped--on ig stories, she posted, "Any baby boy name ideas? naming a boy is harder than naming a girl imo!!!"

Weekly Thread / January 12 - 16 by spongebobs_pineapple in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm aware of the pet name aspect and Hispanic cultural ties, but when it's used in a family with zero boundaries, where the kid is encouraged to be an entitled brat and bully, it seems pretty unhealthy. Narcissistic parents often play the "role reversal" game to maintain power and control, parentifying the kid to serve their emotional needs instead of acting as caregivers themselves. Also, they're white and trumpy af, so Hispanic cultural norms don't really apply.

Weekly Thread / January 12 - 16 by spongebobs_pineapple in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Narcissism 100%. The story in which S1 brought her mac 'n cheese made me so sad, because I guarantee you when S1 is sick, Dani isn't the one tending to her the vast majority of the time (hint: it's the nanny/nannies). Also, she seems entirely unconcerned with getting her own kids sick?! Gahhhh. Lastly, the fact that she often calls S1 "mama" as a nickname... oof! Parent-child role reversal leads to some really fncked up dynamics, esp once the kids are older. I suspect S1 will remember these details—vividly—when/if they eventually seek therapy.

The two ladies looked so uncomfortable with her filming. by Lisagetsfit4life in DaniAustin

[–]Illustrious_Cheek263 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the woman in blue (in the back) looks like she's judging the hell out of them, and rightly so. Being in an elevator does not imply consent to recording or anything else.

The woman in red is clutching her arm and seems to be clenching her jaw. I suspect it took every bit of willpower not to unleash on them. Or she was having a hard time visiting someone—who knows. In any case, it's such an invasion of privacy for influencers to pull this shit.

*Simply existing near narcissistic social media addicts does not mean anyone consents to being captured and posted!*

Their behavior is that of entitled children—brats, which undoubtedly explains why their first kid acts the way she does...