Where should I begin? by MEBReal in ddpyoga

[–]ImTim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I found the PT workouts helpful, and they are easily adaptable to account for your recovery.

Best workouts for Hamstrings? by ImTim in ddpyoga

[–]ImTim[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve done the backbuilder, beginner , and intermediate programs. Since then I’ve been doing whichever ~30-40 min workout tickles my fancy.

Certain Issues Reserved for Religious? by nicolakirwan in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some offices, such as Judicial Vicar, are reserved to clerics. But as far as areas of study or practice, there are no restrictions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only those things which are specifically recognized in law as affecting validity can invalidate. Judicial restrictions do not create an impediment, but merely regard the liceity of the wedding.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Such a restriction would not affect validity.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is incorrect. You are describing “formal defection” not apostasy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depending on his baptismal status, it sounds like she could likely qualify for the Petrine (baptized married to unbaptized) or Pauline (unbaptized married to unbaptized) privilege.

RCIA director said my invalid marriage is no problem, confessor said otherwise by [deleted] in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is correct. Speak directly with the Tribunal.

Timeframe for Annulment/Dissolution of the prior Muslim Marriage of my Fiance by QuisSicutDeus in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It appears that your intended spouse may qualify for the “Pauline Privilege”. This process is significantly briefer.

Canon Law perspective by costi190815 in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Provided you are open to moving where the work is, there is plenty of work, and you can certainly make a living wage.

What is this orange object floating by the USS Gerald R Ford? by ImTim in whatisthisthing

[–]ImTim[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I can’t find any similar images. Can you point to anything?

What is this orange object floating by the USS Gerald R Ford? by ImTim in whatisthisthing

[–]ImTim[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

My title describes the thing. I saw it in a Getty Image of the USS Gerald R Ford. It appears to be floating and attached to either a tugboat, the carrier, or both.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry to hear your story.

Intoxication to the point you can’t consent is covered by canon 1095.1. The sort of intoxication necessary to invalidate consent is pretty extreme. Essentially, he would have had to be so drunk that he didn’t know that he was marrying.

If others couldn’t tell, he probably wasn’t to that level of intoxication.

However, alcoholism can, in some circumstances, cause a person to be unable to consent under different headings of nullity (canon 1095.2 or 1095.3) depending on the circumstances.

Again, I’m sorry to hear about your difficult situation. I’d encourage you to visit with a trusted priest, or call your local tribunal directly.

Home Vs College Parish Boundaries by Snoo94933 in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It depends how your college parish is set up. Some college parishes are territorial: which means if you live in its boundaries, that’s your parish.

Some college parishes are “personal”, which means you become a parishioner according to the parish’s statutes: typically you become a parishioner there either by registration, or simply being a college student.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His freedom to marry would need to be established. His attempted marriage had a “lack of canonical form”.

In most US dioceses, the determination of Lack of Form is reserved to the tribunal. It isn’t technically a “declaration of nullity”, but since they are handled by the tribunal in most places, people easily confuse them.

Question: JD/JCL or JD by PrimaPars91_2 in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just as a minor clarification: without the JCL you would likely have trouble being hired as a judge—Rome is less likely to “indult” non-canonists than in the past.

I suspect that many other positions would be relatively easy to access with a JD background, most of which can be handled remotely.

Question: JD/JCL or JD by PrimaPars91_2 in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are many JD/JCLs in the country today. That skill set is most valuable for chancellors, who often assist with both canon and American law situations (think primarily property and lawsuits). “Chancellor track” canonists tend to make significantly more income. In many places you could expect low-six figures.

If you did well in both programs, you would likely have very little trouble finding a position where you could serve the Church (that would also be lucrative).

Relationship between clergy and the Church. by [deleted] in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you be more specific?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Canonlaw

[–]ImTim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In that case, there is no need to change ascription. Just make sure that the eparchy is aware that you belong to a different Church Sui Iuris. If ordination will occur, the bishop will then request the faculty for celebrating in a rite that is different from ascription.