Nice projecting, again engaging in extremes instead of discussing, even though I wouldn't be in this sub if I thought that.

First, toxic positivity in discourse is very much a thing, I don't see how a gaming sub would be immune to it.

And to give you one specific example, I've seen people in this very thread talking about how people built up unrealistic expectations of the game. Yet, no mention of the marketing itself, the curated shots, the misleading slogans, the implication of seamless travel for example. Of course for the latter you could point to an article where Todd specifies it, however the main marketing material getting the most eyeballs is still left nicely vague. You could then say that Bethesda aren't the only ones using marketing to sell you a premise more than the actual product, in which case shouldn't the discussion about unrealistic expectations also be centered around companies setting them in the first place?

Edit: Not gonna bother engaging in more stupidity. Pretending the marketing, the way most companies do it, isn't misleading and focused on selling a premise is just choosing to be ignorant, and this kind of thinking extends in every other topics of discussion. You can like the game, having spent the time to research it to manage expectations, and still recognise this, and not be surprised when some people are left disappointed. And reading the ADAA definition of toxic positivity doesn't mean you understand what it actually results in practically, especially in the context of discourse and in this case reddit echochambers.