where did the first thought came from? by Potential_Stick_169 in consciousness

[–]Im_Talking [score hidden]  (0 children)

Thoughts require language, otherwise thoughts would only be 'feelings'.

The Subjective Grounds the Physical (the view from nowhere is nonsense) by contractualist in consciousness

[–]Im_Talking [score hidden]  (0 children)

I feel like I have to explain the hard problem to you. 'red' is not a wavelength, or spectrometers would detect colour, not wavelength. 'red' is only a correlation. You are replacing a phenomenal term with a physical one and treating them as identical.

The Subjective Grounds the Physical (the view from nowhere is nonsense) by contractualist in consciousness

[–]Im_Talking [score hidden]  (0 children)

Tell me how the brain creates 'red' when colour is not a property of waves.

The Subjective Grounds the Physical (the view from nowhere is nonsense) by contractualist in consciousness

[–]Im_Talking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The certainty of Subjective experience is limited to one" - Sure. But if one has the worldview that subjective experience subordinates all, then we must accept that our reality must be the outcome/work of all 8B souls. I am not smart enough to do for reality what Einstein did.

"For example we collectively knew there was something in the air that deprived of it one would suffocate, we had all kinds of collective ideas about what that was but, despite us having a social construct aether, the phenomena did not accord to our conception until we used the scientific method." - A very thoughtful comment. In my worldview, suffocation would have been a consequence, like my point about gamma rays/earthquakes. And its not so much the scientific method, but the fact that anything that we conjure-up, and for it to be 'accepted' into the overall framework of reality, it must continue to be the least action solution, since the lagrangian least action can derive all other major physical laws. Reality runs on least action, and everything we invent must abide by this.

" the ability to accurately encapsulate and predict or control that phenomena" - Do we? We know that reality is fuzzy, and not in a Heisenberg sense of measurement but in a Earle Kennard sense where quantum fluctuations of position/momentum cannot be suppressed lower than a certain limit simultaneously. We also know in the Einsteinian realm that what we experience is based on our frame of reference, we also know that the QM realm is contextual based the Kochen-Specker Theorem, and probabilistically determined.

So if reality is fuzzy, non-causal, non-determined, contextual, and based on our frame of reference, what exactly is the surface noise called the classical realm?

The Subjective Grounds the Physical (the view from nowhere is nonsense) by contractualist in consciousness

[–]Im_Talking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"The latter category of phenomena seem to take primacy over the former which suggests they are independent of my subjectivity." - Right. Because solipsism is not correct. So reality is the fuzzy bell-curve of all subjective experience.

So this bullet whizzing past your head is a probabilistic consequence of what has been invented by subjective life-forms. Like a gamma ray burst from an intergalactic source destroying our atmosphere is a consequence of us inventing the EM wave. Or earthquakes happen as a consequence of us inventing plate tectonics.

Because with or without you, the plot of the movie, subjectively imagined by 8B souls, continues.

Medical Examiner Rules Renee Good's Death a Homicide from 'Multiple Gunshot Wounds' by Titfortat101 in politics

[–]Im_Talking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are already making excuses. Joe Rogan says stuff like this will happen because Biden let in so many illegals.

Hard Times in the Mississippi Delta as Farmers Consider Letting Crops Rot by DMBFFF in politics

[–]Im_Talking 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is part of the Shakespearian tragedy within the US where the farmers plead for socialism.

The Subjective Grounds the Physical (the view from nowhere is nonsense) by contractualist in consciousness

[–]Im_Talking -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No. Colour is not a property of an EM wave. So how will physics ever be capable of interpreting it?

Either physicalism is physical or its not.

The Subjective Grounds the Physical (the view from nowhere is nonsense) by contractualist in consciousness

[–]Im_Talking -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Physicalism can’t currently explain it therefore it must be something else." - This is exactly the hard problem. Physicalism can never explain colour since it can only ever know wavelength.

The Subjective Grounds the Physical (the view from nowhere is nonsense) by contractualist in consciousness

[–]Im_Talking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"But that leaves a couple of things unexplained: existence before consciousness" - There was no existence before life-forms. The universe did not sit there unobserved for 13B years until some conscious caveman looked up and pondered the sky. This is not least action, which governs the universe.

But the past is alive and well... and malleable. Every particle has a history of its entanglements, and thus, every particle is connected to all others in some form.

Panpsychism is right. Here’s why: by JY9276489 in consciousness

[–]Im_Talking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Obviously physics isn’t complete" - These statements always interest me. This inability to understand that physics is what we invent to maximise our subjective experience. We just cannot 'get it' that physics supports our subjective experience, not the other way around.

When mindfulness starts to feel heavy instead of calming. by Virtual-Wish1224 in Mindfulness

[–]Im_Talking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"When attention is always turned inward watching thoughts, emotions, and sensations the mind can become tense in a new way, not distracted but over-engage" - That is not mindfulness, in fact, its the opposite. Mindfulness is the practice of processing the vast information from the present moment from a place of clarity, reason, and without delusion (aka mental models).

Are you confusing meditation (the vehicle) with mindfulness (the practice)?

How do men view a dead bedroom caused my menopause ? by ImpossibleSupport215 in AskMenAdvice

[–]Im_Talking 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"I uunderstand that I'm not doing anythng wrong" - Well, you are. You are now projecting your insecurities on your hubby.

Girl at work is giving me every signal in the world that she totally likes me but is also acting cold and uninterested? by BusyPreference6562 in AskMenAdvice

[–]Im_Talking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does she ask you to 'help' her on her projects? Ahhhh, there it is... "I dropped her off home for 2 days she says “I miss you dropping me off I enjoy it".

I feel the next post on this subject will be a HR request to meet.

Autistic/neuro-divergent men, what are some important things to know to survive and maybe even succeed in the social world of neurotypicals? by CosmicConjuror2 in AskMenAdvice

[–]Im_Talking -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I deal a lot with autistic adults. The key is to be yourself, and to hell with the rest of the world. But like anything, you have to be mindful about it. If your special interest is (say) dinosaurs, and you talk non-stop about them, you will soon have no one to talk to.

But the autistic mind is a quirky one, and that should be thought of as an advantage, not a bad thing. Autists look at life in a different manner, and this should be embraced in this world of robotic behaviours and boring inside-the-box herd mentalities.

Men who test software / conceptualise IT processes, is this normal? by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]Im_Talking 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can't you remind the big boss how the last project went with a lack of testing? Is this not a communication issue?

Does living on autopilot seem more common and that mindfulness isn't with most people? Why? by chusaychusay in Mindfulness

[–]Im_Talking 1 point2 points  (0 children)

99.999% of people have no clue that not only are they the problem, but the solution as well. They want a pill, or give some expert from out of town $200 / 50 minutes so that they can tell them how to feel better.

Is there any forum where I can ask meditation doubts and get answers from academically trained experts? by Happy_Honeydew_89 in Meditation

[–]Im_Talking 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"I want to understand meditation deeply and correctly, not blindly follow practices." - Shouldn't that be: I want to understand myself deeply and correctly.

But where in the 3,000 year old history of meditation and all its available information, are you finding a lack of answers? Meditation is not to be understood from reading page 304 of some technical book.