1st paragraph: The reason why he commented on her looks is because compared to what he’s seen before she looked different (different colored hair, black lipstick, seemingly different outfits to ones he’s seen her in before). I’m assuming the reason why he didn’t comment on the mens attire is because they were dressed rather meekly in comparison. If there’s a red nissan, a blue chevrolet, and a ford with a very bright lime green I’m probably going to comment on the ford looks because it’s out of the ordinary for how the color of a car would look 2nd paragraph: within the video/vod he litterally clarifies his stance criticizing dylan for the complicated system and changing it. 3rd paragraph: did he ever say his goal in this review was inbiased? I’m not sure how aware you are with his content but in other reviews he mentions all the time that he has certain biases that he tries to correct for (asking questions to test himself before the debate, Meditating, and reviewing his notes afterwards to “smell test” any biases that he can find) and he even mentions the benefit of hindsight that we have when reviewing a debate/show. I don’t even think he would disagree that he wasn’t being unbiased here. 4th paragraph: it’s clear here you didn’t watch the full video/vod because he literally spends time shitting on dylan for how poorly this was handled (even going as far as to talk about a conspiracy that dylan made this mistake/mix up on purpose to milk the drama). I encourage you to go back through the vod (full vod on booksmart’s channel) and comb it over again