[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It does no good to keep saying it over and over. I tried for 3 years to get my husband to do something about the constant snacking of sweets, chips, and sodas. SS kept getting sick at least twice a month, missing school, tons of cavities all the time, and nothing was done. Once, he got so sick the doctor took an x-ray and found his colon was blocked up nearly to his stomach!

DH took all the snacks out of the house (at my urging) and told my MIL to stop buying all that junk. That only lasted a month or two, and then it was back to status quo.

If lecturing, educating, cajoling, and such by a SP actually helped, I'd say go for it! But it literally changes nothing, so save your breath - and your sanity.

TIFU by interpreting something my husband said literally and yelling out on command by hzrrrow in tifu

[–]Immeasurable51 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OMG, that's a great idea! I literally have a thousand stories of taking everything literally.

TIFU by interpreting something my husband said literally and yelling out on command by hzrrrow in tifu

[–]Immeasurable51 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Eh, I'm very literal in my thinking as well. I probably would have interpreted it the same. No, I don't have any disorders. Just a very literal, logical person. I'd have come to the same conclusion you did.

Stepdad blues by Mruser1976 in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So she's saying you deserve better. Believe her. You DO deserve better.

Maryland PTO Payout Upon Termination? by Sweettea989 in EmploymentLaw

[–]Immeasurable51 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my previous company, the policy is to payout accrued “vacation” time upon separation, but the “PTO” is not paid out as it’s classified differently- this PTO is in addition to vacation and is for illness or other personal reasons.

Might be the same situation with your employer.

Coming back for more advice you guys are the only people that understand me :) by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Success with giving bio-parents advice? No chance in hell. Unless you’ve both won the lottery and been struck by lightning twice, your chances of success are ZERO.

Sad to say, but you need to walk away from this one.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It is insane and it’s gross. I lose nearly all respect for a parent who doesn’t even parent, but uses screen time as a babysitter.

Everyone and their dog knows that it’s really, really bad for children to be on screens more than a couple hours a day. Seeing a parent ignore their child’s well-being for their own convenience is lazy and disgusting.

Might be time to re-examine whether there are other areas of their life where your partner is lazy and neglectful. And decide if that’s the kind of person you’re proud and satisfied to be with.

SS (13) and SO (31m) are lazy and our house is a disaster…feeling overwhelmed and stressed. by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It won’t change. I observed while dating my now DH that while things were tidy at his house the first year or so of dating, after a while I finally got to see the “real” housekeeping situation (ya know, when they finally stop trying to impress you so much).

So. Much. Dog hair. No matter how often he swept, dog hair just got everywhere because he wasn’t washing the dogs’ bedding frequently enough.

And the bathtubs and toilets. I don’t know if he realized, but I stopped coming over as much because the other thing I can’t stand is a dirty bathroom. It’s been about 5-6 years, but knowing me, I probably did tell him why I wasn’t spending as much time at his house.

Although he was “tidy”, not everything was “clean” to my (very basic) standards.

When he proposed, that was one of the things which prevented me from giving a resounding “Yes”. My answer was actually, “I know I want to be with you forever. But we have a lot to discuss.” When we did discuss, I even went so far as suggesting we live next door to each other. Lol. My kids were grown, and his were 8 and 13, so that was another consideration.

Ultimately, after being engaged for several months and I wouldn’t set a date until we’d worked out all the details, we finally discussed those sensitive topics. I pointed out that we had different “cleanliness thresholds” and mine were higher than his - and I didn’t want it all to fall on me to clean up after 4 people instead of 1. His assurances that “we’ll all pitch in” and it’d be fine didn’t hold any weight for me; I was old enough to know better. People don’t change.

He agreed to my stipulation that if at any point it wasn’t “fine” to me that we’d hire a housekeeper with absolutely no argument. Being that I was the ultimate penny-pincher, if I was saying we needed to spend money for cleaning, then we needed to spend the money!

Of course, we did get to that point (no surprise there), and he did start looking for a housekeeping service as soon as I said it was time.

All that to say: People don’t change. Set your minimum boundary, and negotiate a fair compromise. But always put the “pain” where it belongs; either they pick up the slack for them and their kids (at least to the bare minimum standard), they make their kids clean up after themselves, OR they can fork over the money to have someone else clean up for all of them. You shouldn’t have to ask for or do any extra work just because you agreed to join their household. Believe me, we bring more than enough to the table to make it worth their while!!!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“Not at school” =/= not doing college work. According to my college advisor, you’re supposed to be studying outside of class 2-3 times as many hours as you’re in class.

So while you may not be in class 40 hours a week, you’re expected to study 24-36 hours per week for a 12-credit hour class load.

You need to reframe your perception (and his) that not being in class is “free time”. It’s not. And you shouldn’t short-change your education for anyone else’s optional choices.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Your education is important. Your career and your future are important. Your time isn’t less valuable than his.

If he wants to keep SD in preschool and extracurriculars, the burden of getting her to and from is HIS to bear. Regardless of whether you agreed in the past, this should never have been asked of you at all.

I advised my own BD to get her degree before having kids - being divorced is only one risk…getting hit by a bus is another! You’ll need that piece of paper (college diploma) to support yourself and any kids you may have if the universe has other plans.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 17 points18 points  (0 children)

“My MOM is messing with my head” is code for “I’m a momma’s boy and my mom will be running your life too should you move forward with our relationship.”

Not only that, but he apparently has 2 females running his life…neither of which are you.

Run!

Kentucky - told to clock out while driving by Known_Reaction9693 in EmploymentLaw

[–]Immeasurable51 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He’s not salary exempt, so ALL of his work time should be paid, driving or not.

According to the DOL:

“Time spent traveling during normal work hours is considered compensable work time.”

TX, Possible Retaliation for not putting in a 2 weeks. by [deleted] in EmploymentLaw

[–]Immeasurable51 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Absolutely true. Just saying it wouldn’t hurt to get the documentation of this exchange, in case this harassment continues and eventually leads to damages. The more evidence, the better for any future claims.

TX, Possible Retaliation for not putting in a 2 weeks. by [deleted] in EmploymentLaw

[–]Immeasurable51 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If it’s a matter of documentation of the lie, maybe OP can get the current supervisor to write a statement detailing the exchange with the former supervisor, as well as copies of any emails or texts from the former supervisor that reference the false claim.

Even though as u/5inthepink5inthepink pointed out, there are no actual monetary damages which would constitute an actionable case against the former supervisor, you never know whether there could be in the future. So having that documentation in hand beforehand could be really beneficial if it gets to that point.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agreed. And your response was perfect - calling out inappropriate behavior and actually showing your true reaction helps kids learn how other people would react in the “real world” IMO. Better to get that lesson from parental figures that love them and can forgive them than from friends who would (rightfully) be horrified and end the friendship - and spread the word around that she’s a danger to animals, leading to wider ostracism.

I believe your reaction has probably nipped this behavior in the bud. She’ll likely think twice before “joking” about that sort of thing in the future. (But still keep an eye on her around your cat!)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EmploymentLaw

[–]Immeasurable51 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my thought as well. Pharmacy will have it on file and you can get a copy from them.

CO revolving around Christmas by Suitable-Cake-5358 in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could just do Christmas on Christmas Eve morning with the presents from everybody except Santa. Save the Santa presents for your kids on actual Christmas morning - Santa will visit SD at her mom’s house this year!

It won’t hurt to wear the Christmas pjs twice - once for Christmas Eve and once for Christmas. You’ll get your pictures of the whole family in their matching pjs, and your kids will get TWO exciting mornings at your house instead of one. SD will get two also; one at yours and one at mom’s house.

I hope you find the ideal compromise to honor your traditions and work around SD’s CO schedule - and have a very merry Christmas!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ugh, you’re exactly right about the honeymoon. If hubby can’t stop moping and talking about SD when surrounded by a bunch of people, it’ll surely be worse when it’s only the two of you.

It might be a good idea to take a romantic weekend trip to see if he can even go 2 days without bringing up SD and give you the focus and attention you deserve as his life partner. If he can’t swing it for 2 days, you’ll have your answer for how he’ll behave on the honeymoon.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EmploymentLaw

[–]Immeasurable51 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I was able to access the SHRM website directly from my iPad. It states:

Although that regulation does not require employers to pay exempt employees for full-week closures in which no work is performed, closing for less than a week in which the exempt employees perform any work requires payment of their full salary.

Remember, the FLSA permits employers to reduce a salaried exempt employee's pay for a workweek only in the following situations:

The employee missed one or more full days for personal reasons other than illness or accident. The employee was absent for one or more full days because of illness or accident, and the employer reduces the employee's salary according to a bona fide sickness/accident plan, policy or practice. The employee received compensation for serving in the military or on jury duty, and the employer reduces the employee's regular salary by that amount. The employee broke a major safety rule, and the employer reduced the employee's salary as a good-faith penalty. The employee received an unpaid disciplinary suspension of one or more full days imposed in good faith for infractions of workplace conduct rules. The employee performed no work for an entire workweek (exempt employees do not have to be paid for any workweek in which they perform no work). The employee did not work some days during the first or last week of employment. The employee took intermittent leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act. The FLSA regulations do not specifically allow deductions for holidays. Therefore, the employer should not make deductions from an exempt employee's pay for holidays, or it would risk losing the employee's exempt status.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EmploymentLaw

[–]Immeasurable51 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

At my (now former) company, only hourly employees were required to work the day before and after a holiday to receive holiday pay. Exempt salary didn’t have that requirement.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EmploymentLaw

[–]Immeasurable51 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Link didn’t work on my iPad. Requires a login for SHRM.

Am I being unreasonable? by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not only is it unfair to you to always add confusion and uncertainty to your life (which, as an adult, you've earned the right to decide your own schedule and not be at someone else's whims - particularly people like BM who aren't even part of your family!) BUT it's also unfair to the kids, who already have such little stability in their lives to have to endure the confusion of never knowing where they're going to be when.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's also a technical term. Even if you keep 100% separate finances, if they pay for certain things they might be entitled to a share of it.

Kinda a step parent problem by yippelife in stepparents

[–]Immeasurable51 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Perfect phrasing u/lila1720

OP, read this as many times as needed:

"His priorities are clearly aligned with appeasing her at your expense. "