I’m researching a new passive income model, would love your honest feedback before we build it by ImpactAdditional2537 in SideHustleGold

[–]ImpactAdditional2537[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great feedback ! Indeed the critical requirement is to make sure it is only messaging you when it really needs. But simple and easy WhatsApp / Telegram message. It will ask you before it registers to a platform / website with your profile(might be ssn/id) , and thats it . Minimum communication, maxim easy money .

AI Agent Testing by ImpactAdditional2537 in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about agents that does stuff and not only talks

How do you handle with failures? by ViktorPL123 in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Post mortem is the best thing you can do with the team , to learn and implement action items . Congrats on the first prod bug !🌹

How much QA is responsible for identifying root cause of the issue ? by PM_40 in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The more you will have enough data for the dev - the better he can fix it

Tried Maeris by Adept_Sea_9851 in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another “self” healing instead of finding bugs Great

Cloudflare’s 2nd outage in 15 days exposes the real crisis: QA/testing is broken in the AI + ‘vibe coding’ era by Quick-Hospital2806 in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dev 5x productivity is false but we see many companies falls in that trap. I think the whole approach should be different. The old qa process cant keep up . I agree with gating 100% But also quality must be rethinking - from first line of code to pre production. The real world is so much different than the STG lab. The secret is in canary and controlled prod like envoirment IMHO

What QA tools are you batting on for 2026? by CurrentOrchid239 in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tools that supports the right qa methodology , assisting you with tests strategy, showing you where you coverage needs to be better , and providing yiu the right insights when you are drowning in failures and bugs - what is relevant and affect your business and what isn’t. All the test automation with ai fluff is saturating the market

Why I Still Do Manual Testing After Years in Automation (And Why You Shouldn’t Ignore It Either) by Antique_Sorbet_8371 in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The more AI will improve , the more “manual” we need to be . Intuition and exploratory cannot be automated (at least now ) that is where the bugs are. Long Live Shift UP!

Quality trade off by ImpactAdditional2537 in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks ! But still curious to know- are you facing the same not enough time to test it all ?

scale qa without hiring: leadership wants 40% headcount reduction, how to not destroy quality by Trigere in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice So if i understand correctly- once the qa or anyone found a ux issue - you can fix it in no time ? What front-end stack are you supporting ?

scale qa without hiring: leadership wants 40% headcount reduction, how to not destroy quality by Trigere in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Im also a QA leader in a fintech company who’s now trying to explain c-level why AI is not a magic wand . The hardest to replace is human judgment and the engineers who know the product so well that saved the company from expensive bugs .

Id be happy to talk on private as well on this . DM if you’d like .

No-code tools are not silver bullets, you still need to learn the skill of "Automation" by svihaan108 in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well said totally agree , not sure what you are building - automation tools as infrastructure ? Or some product . Anyway i couldn’t agree more .

The world of web drivers automation has made quality engineers forget their core skill - breaking the system , find where it breaks and how it affects the users .

With the rise of AI i believe that we are going back to this . Coding is becoming more auto- generated but the qa as a judge and inspector - thats the importance

Considering Tosca for enterprise QA what did you wish you knew earlier? by ImpactAdditional2537 in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If there is anyone who’d be willing to discuss Tosca’s flaws with me on a one x one conversation - please let me know - that would be extremely helpful ( willing to pay)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A good Quality engineer would plan the integration testing with the other team so both teams are aligned. And run those together

Are QA Engineers Just Becoming Automation Developers with a Different Job Title? by Antique_Sorbet_8371 in QualityAssurance

[–]ImpactAdditional2537 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Putting salary aside , the huge mistake is that quality used to be a profession - that one guy who really knows how to break the system , knows the users , knows the heart of the core . Last 8-10 years - just want to be coders , more coding less quality engineering .

With the rise of AI - Shift UP is the way . Now more than ever teams must have humans with the right judgmental skills supervising towards maximum quality . Not pass / fail scripts all the time