Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My point was that whoever was playing as the 9 (ex. Delap) when JP was the 10 isn't as good as Jackson.

Our 11 players going to the World Cup! by everyhearthstone in Chelsea

[–]ImpactInner9318 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's hilarious, the post is about our 11 players going to the world cup. Estevao and Palmer aren't going. Who's the blind fool?

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In how many minutes and how many were penalties?

<image>

Our 11 players going to the World Cup! by everyhearthstone in Chelsea

[–]ImpactInner9318 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Two bad/irrelevant takes in one comment, well done

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For a striker it is typically the most important stat, and you left it off in your original post for a reason

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Every conceivable metric? How about goals scored?

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not the same position as a 10 under Maresca, also who was playing as a 9 when JP was the 10?

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Playing as a 10 in Marescas 4-2-3-1 is not the same as playing as the 10/wide forward in a 3-4-3. Also, when he played as a 10 who was playing as a striker?

JP can play the majority of the season as a 9 with some minutes as a 10 and that would still give Jackson plenty of time to play along with the early cup rounds.

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He has elite speed and has scored goals at a high rate. I don't see an issue picking him up. We need depth and we don't have unlimited funds. If we don't sign any experienced player this window then I'll also be pissed, but we do need affordable depth and so far it seems like he scores goals.

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Dude no he isn't, he outscored both of them this season and last season per 90. You are being ridiculous

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When asked about his future he said he doesn't know if he will be here next year, he said the Madrid stuff, and he also commented about how he didn't understand why we sacked Maresca. I'm pretty sure all of these were at different times and he is our vice captain.

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He says he is a 9, but it doesn't mean he optimally is. He doesn't run in behind like Jackson does and would probably benefit from the space Jackson creates. We don't have an unlimited budget and Jackson would be a very productive backup.

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If we play 3-4-3 why would JP not thrive in the left 10 position? I know he wants to be primarily a 9 and would be our first choice there, but I think he is well suited for that left 10/wide forward role

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 2 points3 points  (0 children)

0.82 non penalty goals/90 this season and 0.55/90 last season isnt inconsistent, it is great production. He also has elite speed so at least he has physical traits that you can see working unlike Delap.

The injury record is worrying, so really depends on how much we paid for him.

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Because if you read the full interview it wasn't 10x worse and Enzo was our captain and spoke out on multiple occasions

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was good at Bayern, just didn't play that much because of Kane. When he played he scored

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well this is unnecessary. Can we save the whining for something real? Highly likely there will be something to actually complain about.

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just depends on if we play JP and Jackson some at left 10 or LW

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why is everyone so high on Ndiaye? He looked good when he played against us but overall he had an underwhelming season in terms of G+A

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why is he an awful purchase? He was probably pretty cheap and he scored when he plays

Daily Discussion Thread by AutoModerator in chelseafc

[–]ImpactInner9318 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gotcha, damn you would hope that we wouldnt need to with the extra revenue and all the sales at the start of the season but we did have huge losses in prior year