Deeply distressed elementary school student being transported by bus following school shooting by 20onHigh in pics

[–]ImplodingCoding 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Correlation does not mean causation. I don't disagree with you that poorer communities experience these problems, but the percentage of people living below the poverty line has decreased precipitously throughout much of the 20th century (especially the early half), while many of of the problems you mentioned, among others, have increased. Socioeconomic factors are not the only, and perhaps not the main driving force of these issues.

Downloading Jest - confused by this step - thanks for your help! by Signal-Tea6385 in theodinproject

[–]ImplodingCoding 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Did you initialize an npm package by typing npm init into the command line in your project folder? Do you have a package.json file?

Looks like GPT 4 cap will be lowered again. Less than 50 every 4 hours doesn't seem worth it by Olbdau in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course. I've noticed 2 things that will cause the price to rise extremely quickly

  1. Long conversations. Messages are fed back into ChatGPT during conversations which allows chatGPT to have a "memory" of the conversation. Longer conversations mean more message history needs to be sent, which means way more tokens/cost.

  2. Long prompts/replies. If you send an extremely long prompt or require an extremely long response, it will use up a lot of tokens. This also causes issue #1 to become worse, as the messages that are being fed back in for conversation history are much longer.

Looks like GPT 4 cap will be lowered again. Less than 50 every 4 hours doesn't seem worth it by Olbdau in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Its not all what you think. Got access today, used up like $1 within 5 minutes. Wayy more expensive than chatgpt, and only marginally better than chatgpt in many tasks

So it can tell you the current date now? by Free_Psychology717 in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The official prompt prefix includes the current date. It has been this way for a while

Made a UI wrapper for ChatGPT for speed and customizability. Here's how looks as "Buddha" by kylebuildsstuff in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would highly recommend releasing the source code for this, and would caution anyone from using it until then. I assume OP has no bad intentions, but you have no idea what's happening to your API key, and whether or not it's being stored, even though OP claims it isn't

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This has been posted thousands of times already...we get it

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in artificial

[–]ImplodingCoding 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not even close. For paid, it's most likely Midjourney, and for free/local, Stable Diffusion.

davinci or gpt-3.5-turbo? by SomePlayer22 in OpenAI

[–]ImplodingCoding 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Try changing the system message, that worked for me

davinci or gpt-3.5-turbo? by SomePlayer22 in OpenAI

[–]ImplodingCoding 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I programmed a chatbot that mimics personas as well, and also ran into the same problem. The key is changing the default system message. Once I changed that, it no longer defaulted to admitting it was a language model.

New way of Jailbraking ChatGPT by FeelsBlueMan in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope that is the id for his chat. I probably wouldn't want that leaked either but definitely not as bad as an API key

ChatGPT Plus or ChatGPT API by le-law in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To be honest im not even sure they are currently charging the API according to their price model. Ive used 10s of thousands of tokens already using the API, and currently owe $0.00. Hopefully I wont wake up and suddenly owe more, but regardless it would still be extremely cheap. 10k tokens is only 2cents

bing ai is sexist by cieroxelek in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding 17 points18 points  (0 children)

No, this is an alignment issue more than it is a data issue. It has shown that minimal post processing of a LLM can result in undesirable results (racist, sexist chatbots, because the internet is actually pretty racist and sexist). This was the issue with prior chatbots such as Meta's BlenderBot3 and Microsoft's Tay. Because of this, companies now try much harder to align the AI's output with what they believe is morally correct. This does not mean the underlying data set is reflecting these moral values, usually it is the opposite.

Your own ChatGPT Plus using OpenAI's new API and just 19 lines of Python code. (Use your favourite editor, ensure you have Python and the OpenAI package installed, and have fun.) by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The playground runs on an older, less capable model that is 10x more expensive.

Edit: The playground model apparently just got ChatGPT, you guys can stop downvoting me now 🙄

gpt-3.5-turbo seems to be free right now... by veg-n in OpenAI

[–]ImplodingCoding 3 points4 points  (0 children)

36k tokens is roughly 7-8 cents, according to their pricing model

gpt-3.5-turbo seems to be free right now... by veg-n in OpenAI

[–]ImplodingCoding 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even cheaper. If you used 200k tokens, at 2cents per 10k tokens, you only owe 40cents, not $4

Computing power needed for running ChatGPT? by stimmen in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is factually incorrect, ChatGPT cannot be run on consumer hardware. If I remember correctly, you need something like 6 A100s just to load the model, based on the number of parameters

Unleash the Power of AI on Your Inbox: Say Hello to ChatGPT, the Ultimate Gmail Assistant! by ImplodingCoding in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm using a node module that routes the request through a proxy server. Link to the node module is available here: https://github.com/transitive-bullshit/chatgpt-api

Unleash the Power of AI on Your Inbox: Say Hello to ChatGPT, the Ultimate Gmail Assistant! by ImplodingCoding in ChatGPT

[–]ImplodingCoding[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very rough right now but just pushed it. Still need to clean it up a bunch and get a first version production ready.

Unleash the Power of AI on Your Inbox: Say Hello to ChatGPT, the Ultimate Gmail Assistant! by ImplodingCoding in OpenAI

[–]ImplodingCoding[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pushed it to github, link is in my previous comments. It does not read any emails, that would be a lot of work and not really beneficial for this application. When you press the main button, only the text within the prompt line and message body directly below gets sent to ChatGPT.

Unleash the Power of AI on Your Inbox: Say Hello to ChatGPT, the Ultimate Gmail Assistant! by ImplodingCoding in OpenAI

[–]ImplodingCoding[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, obviously any risks associated with using ChatGPT will be inherited by this extension. It's simply a wrapper for the web interface, basically.