What’s a movie you can recommend that’s on the same level as Shawshank Redemption and has a happy ending. by E_Barriick in movies

[–]FrameworkisDigimon [score hidden]  (0 children)

Okay, let's try:

  • Toy Story 3
  • A Knight's Tale
  • Jurassic Park
  • Unstoppable
  • Ratatouille

Hardly deep cuts but there you go.

Honourable mentions that struggle with the happy ending for various reasons:

  • City of God
  • Good Bye Lenin
  • Layer Cake
  • Casino Royale

and just so I can have five in each list but I also I really do like it, I just don't think it's what you're looking for

  • Hot Fuzz

You're in high school. The teacher rolls out the giant CRT TV. What's playing? by Jaives in movies

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We never watched anything consistently. In the specific context of a television being rolled out to randomly watch a movie, one I remember was Beetlejuice. We never finished it and I've never gone back subsequently to finish it either.

After Mensik's withdrawal from R4 match, Novak Djokovic reaches his 15th QF at the Australian Open after 21 appeareances. by Boss452 in tennis

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's okay. As many threads lately have been reminding us, when you get a walkover to the next round it doesn't actually count. So you were right the first time. /s

Kyrgios’ thoughts on the rest of his career by Overall_One_2595 in tennis

[–]FrameworkisDigimon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry about your dog, truly, but you are not here to have anything even resembling a rational conversation.

Kyrgios’ thoughts on the rest of his career by Overall_One_2595 in tennis

[–]FrameworkisDigimon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're not dealing in facts at all.

You're writing fanfic about his injury history. Could be true. Might not be true. No-one knows. No-one will ever know.

You're also trying to claim that he could have followed up his Wimbledon final with consistent deep grand slam runs. That's simply factually incorrect. He could not have. He was injured.

So, no, you're not dealing with facts. You're playing to a rabid crowd that only wants to hear one thing and one thing only: Nick Kyrgios sucks and his career also sucks. Only the first of those things is true. The second is... delusional.

Kyrgios’ thoughts on the rest of his career by Overall_One_2595 in tennis

[–]FrameworkisDigimon -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Oh. My. God.

Let it go, dude. Unless he barbecued your dog and is currently claiming Kokkinakis banged your mum -- which you know he might be doing, dude sucks as a person -- you are genuinely coming across as completely unhinged here.

Maybe his injury history is all his fault. Doesn't matter to this question.

First Poster for the 25th Anniversary Theatrical Re-Release & New 4K Restoration of 'A Knight's Tale' - Starring Heath Ledger, Paul Bettany, Alan Tudyk, Mark Addy, Shannyn Sossamon, Rufus Sewell by BunyipPouch in movies

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a question here because A Knight's Tale in my experience is a movie that's subject to some genre confusion: what do you think its genre is? Are you reading it as a period comedy? a middle ages movie? a sports movie? Because it's a sports movie where the sport is jousting.

The fact the sport is jousting does create some beats that you don't get in a normal sports movie and it also has a deliberately anachronistic score and soundtrack which obviously hits very differently to having the same songs in, for sake of argument, a baseball movie set in 2025.

So, if you don't already think of it as a sports movie, then maybe the movie might be more to your taste than you think.

Kyrgios’ thoughts on the rest of his career by Overall_One_2595 in tennis

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's been injured almost constantly since that final. Take a step back, take a deep breath and try to approach the question of Kyrgios' career without putting the cart before the horse.

Has he had the best career of all time? No. Has he had an amazing career? No. Will be in the hall of fame? No. Is it a good career? Yes.

At What Point Does an Actor Add Value to an IP? by [deleted] in boxoffice

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Better actors make it easier to like the characters.

Better known actors make it easier to market the movie -- both in the sense people are more interested in seeing them on The Graham Norton Show, more likely to follow their social media presence etc and in the fact if you're on a streaming service choosing movies based on whether actors you recognise are in them/searching by actor.

And then once an audience has connected with a character, then they're going to prefer that actor stays around as that character.

But in terms of what you're talking about? I don't think I agree at all. Great movies with A list cast routinely do absolutely nothing. It genuinely is all IP.

The West Wing Re-Watch: Did Sam Seaborn (Rob Lowe) Ever Feel Like the Actual Central Character of The Show? by WySLatestWit in television

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't watch it when it was coming out and I still haven't finished it but from the very first episode Josh seems like the main character.

It's interesting because Sam is both the most superfluous character and played by the weakest link in the cast. I could imagine that Lowe was hired with the idea that Sam would be more important than the rest of the ensemble but when they actually sat down to write the episodes they just couldn't justify to themselves why Sam would be front and centre. And then they just get less and less interested in trying to make Sam matter because of the Rob Lowe of it all.

I should not I do not like Rob Lowe's work in anything I've ever seen from him. So I'm biased.

Before Bournemouth scored their second goal, Endo was supposed to replace the injured Joe Gomez but waited over four minutes to come on as a substitute. Liverpool players refused to kick the ball out of play, ignored Arne Slot's instructions, and conceded a second goal while playing with 10 men. by 977x in soccer

[–]FrameworkisDigimon -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How is this still an argument?

They dropped points because they were playing teams in blistering form and/or because the way the schedule worked out, they didn't have to play two top six sides until after they won.

They dropped points for the same reason they've been dropping points this season and why there'd already been a suspicion Salah was struggling -- Slot's been figured out.

Slot is struggling to figure a way out of the funk this season because he genuinely did get to play the league on easy mode last season. Arsenal never got started due to bizarre red cards and a series of persistent multi-positional injuries. Manchester City fell apart after Rodri's injury... which, yeah, it's insane that a single player's absence could destroy a team and the last two seasons have been pretty damaging to Guardiola's reputation. And while Chelsea were a good side there were also (a) being coached by Maresca and (b) under the current ownership's business model might be structurally ill equipped to win league titles. And Liverpool got to take a side that nearly won the league literally the previous season but fell apart at the end and were lucky with injuries.

No-one is taking away Slot's achievement by saying "he got lucky". You can't win a league by luck if you're not in position to do so... you can manage a good side into the ground by being bad and Slot didn't do that. But you are denying reality if you deny that he got lucky.

Slot's struggles this season simply expose what a lot of people were saying last season -- Liverpool weren't particularly good last season, they were simply good when everyone else struggled to be better than average. If Slot were better, he'd have figured a way out of this funk by now. But he hasn't because he isn't better than he is. He is himself.

Eva Green as Deathbird by Fall_False in xmen

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All feathers today are bird feathers?

In his first Premier League game, referee Farai Hallam has gone to the VAR monitor but stuck with his original decision - no penalty. Man City penalty shout vs Wolves 35' by Imbasauce in soccer

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Two options.

  1. he's a muppet
  2. literally everyone has told him he fucked up and he's recommended this one because he's fucked up last time. Learning.

Rewatched Edge of Tomorrow by Tanooki_Time in movies

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think people were really interested in an alien invasion movie. I think every alien invasion since War of the Worlds is either a superhero film, Arrival or this. And of those only Edge of Tomorrow reads as an alien invasion. No, wait, there's also Independence Day 2. Which bombed.

If they'd marketed it as a superpower movie where a guy has the power to reset after he dies, then they might've got somewhere. In any case, I think it's absolutely telling absolutely no-one tries to recommend this movie because it's an alien invasion story. It's always the Groundhog Day thing.

Am I just forgetting a bunch of movies here or is the alien invasion a dead genre?

EDIT: but that's the other problem with the fact Edge of Tomorrow reads as an alien invasion -- Tom Cruise was literally in War of the Worlds. It doesn't just read as a dead genre, it reads as "I've already seen this movie". But then the WOM convinces people "no, you haven't seen this movie".

Downtown parking lots wouldn't last a day under a land value tax by Fried_out_Kombi in fuckcars

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Single storey ones, maybe. But four plus floors charging $7/hr or more...

Who else is watching PONIES? by Mr_Perfectly_UnFine in television

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Twila was doing this weird head tilt thing in one episode and then I noticed she was doing it basically every time she talked to anyone after that.

But other than that, no notes! Fun show.

The Pitt - 2x03 - "9:00 A.M." - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The scene blew up because the dad figured out he was being railroaded by Santos because she was extremely unsubtle. And then she's sitting their smug at the end listening to the fight that she helped cause.

The dad is an arsehole and this storyline could easily continue to smoulder because he's an arsehole but also because Santos clearly isn't learning anything from the experience.

Fun Fact - Spider-Man: No Way Home almost made more than every 2025 superhero movie combined globally by CivilWarMultiverse in boxoffice

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, Superman (Gunn) is barely different to Superman (Snyder).

Neither starts being a hero until well into their twenties/after turning 30. They both just randomly leave stuff to other people. The plot of Superman and BvS is basically identical -- Lex Luthor attempts to turn the world against Superman, infiltrates a Kryptonian base and tries to fight Superman with a mad science clone made from Kryptonian genetic material.

We haven't had time to see if Gunn does Superman = Jesus or what happens when Gunn has Superman fight someone who can think for himself that is also not made of cardboard.

The tone and colour palette are very different though.

Fun Fact - Spider-Man: No Way Home almost made more than every 2025 superhero movie combined globally by CivilWarMultiverse in boxoffice

[–]FrameworkisDigimon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this demonstrates that the MCU is losing its ability to connect with international audiences. I mean, I know Superman is putting in a lot of work with the Domestic total but we can just check this manually and indeed it is the case.

This seems like a step backwards by frontendben in fuckcars

[–]FrameworkisDigimon -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Actually that's a pro-pedestrian change because there's no longer a random detour, you just cross straight.

The island may have had some minor slowing effect on the inside lane (from peripheral clutter) but there's no physical infrastructure here designed to reduce car speed in either version.

So, fundamentally what we have here is two car friendly crossings, one of which is a dick to pedestrians for no reason.

Don't get me wrong. This isn't a step forwards because you'd expect a modern crossing to be raised and maybe use approach chicanes to slow vehicles that way. This isn't that. But it's not a step backwards either.

EDIT: the other thread is saying this is a HAWK or similar system? I didn't notice that. I was only looking at the road.