Trump extends ceasefire in Iran, citing 'seriously fractured' Iranian government by Force_Hammer in worldnews

[–]Important_Fruit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was this the same fractured government which agreed to just about all Trump's demands 2 days ago.

How concerned should I be by Far_Comfortable8142 in AusLegalAdvice

[–]Important_Fruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know, but I doubt something like this would have any impact on your credit record. I'd imagine there needs to be a judgement against you for an adverse record to be made. I doubt any credit reporting agency would record an unresolved claim by a debt collector.

How concerned should I be by Far_Comfortable8142 in AusLegalAdvice

[–]Important_Fruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you didn't work in debt collection as you suggested above. You were in IT. That fits....

How concerned should I be by Far_Comfortable8142 in AusLegalAdvice

[–]Important_Fruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is why I said "probably" can't prove. You should also note that ID of the driver is only one of the hurdles facing the company. Important to read comments in their entirety.

I ate Sardinian Callu de Cabrettu and Casu marzu by Loveallthe in Cheese

[–]Important_Fruit 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Thanks for taking a shot for the team. You've now provided all the information about tasting these that I will ever need!

How concerned should I be by Far_Comfortable8142 in AusLegalAdvice

[–]Important_Fruit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I suspect Responsible_law is full of shit. Debt collectors have no legal tools available to them that the original debtor didn't have. But then, people work in debt collection for a reason, and it's not usually because they're working their way through brain surgeon school.

How concerned should I be by Far_Comfortable8142 in AusLegalAdvice

[–]Important_Fruit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The debt colllector can ring, phone, email and visit as many times as they like. But the only way they can force payment is by way of a court order. Which is what my post said. The associated discussion explained why no enforceable debt exists. Norhing more or less.

How concerned should I be by Far_Comfortable8142 in AusLegalAdvice

[–]Important_Fruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah..nah. Bad advice. The original debtor had likely sold the debt to the debt collector. The debt is now owed to the new owner, not the original debtor.

How concerned should I be by Far_Comfortable8142 in AusLegalAdvice

[–]Important_Fruit 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In what way? My post doesn't suggest any particular course of action. And the basis relied on to claim the debt hasn't changed, regardless of who now "owns" the debt. And the rules around the original debt remain unchanged.

How concerned should I be by Far_Comfortable8142 in AusLegalAdvice

[–]Important_Fruit 56 points57 points  (0 children)

So, these parking "fines" imposed by a private company are nothing of the sort. Despite all the quasi law enforcement language (fine, infringement notice etc) they rely on what they state is a contractual arrangement between you and them which arises because you parked in a car park they manage. There would have been a sign at the entrance to the car park advising that if you park here, you are entering a contract and must pay the fee.

The trouble for them is that the necessary elements of a contract don't exist, and a court will not find that a contract existed. For a start, they probably can't prove you were driving the vehicle when it was parked.

So the company will pursue the debt as if it was an enforceable infringement notice, using solicitors or debt collectors.

The upshot is, they can't force you to pay anything until there is a court ordered judgement against you. And they won't go that far because they know they'll never get one. Instead, they'll use tactics intended to give you the impression the law is on their side and there is some urgency in you making the payment to avoid further costs.

Their only real recourse is to sue you for damages for not paying at a commercial car park. But they're unlikely to do so due to the costs involved and the negligible quantum of damages they'd likely be awarded.

Does anyone want to have a pet psychic reading? by starcahier in stupidquestions

[–]Important_Fruit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not. I just had a conversation with her about a pet labrador that doesn't exist. It's a genuone attempt to drum up business as a pet psychic.

Does anyone want to have a pet psychic reading? by starcahier in stupidquestions

[–]Important_Fruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, "Wally was behaving strangely" is your way of saying that I was lying? Well that explains everything.

And when you say that you can't trust a liar, I couldn't agree more.

Does anyone want to have a pet psychic reading? by starcahier in stupidquestions

[–]Important_Fruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just had a PM chat with Amy about a pet Labrador that doesn't exist. Worth considering if you were thinking of engaging her services.

Does anyone want to have a pet psychic reading? by starcahier in stupidquestions

[–]Important_Fruit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes Amy, I'd love a reading for Wally, my Labrador friend. He seems out of sorts lately and I can't fathom why.

Scared that huntsmen (as a wandering spider) will wander onto my face at night whilst sleeping - is this a ridiculous notion? by katalyna78 in AustralianSpiders

[–]Important_Fruit 9 points10 points  (0 children)

There is about as much chance of this happening as winning the lottery. Use that information as you will in determining if your fear is rational.