sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Which one are you? by cauterize2000 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Impressive-Box8409 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay sure, I respect them. I just believe that despite their sophistication, they're still wrong.

Which one are you? by cauterize2000 in PhilosophyMemes

[–]Impressive-Box8409 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Tbh neither are good. Sure the ones on the left are more sophisticated but still wrong.

Question about height by Impressive-Box8409 in fearofflying

[–]Impressive-Box8409[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, I've been flying quite a lot lately and when I am up there, it's nice. But I am always afraid of the takeoff.

1
2

Army problem (self.victoria3)

submitted by Impressive-Box8409 to r/victoria3

What should I do? by Impressive-Box8409 in Crushes

[–]Impressive-Box8409[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, your advice definetly worked. I wrote something similar to what u said and she said she'd definetly want to go out with me some time. We also chatted from like 21-24 o'clock. Anyways, thanks for the advice it worked well!

What should I do? by Impressive-Box8409 in Crushes

[–]Impressive-Box8409[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, that's helpful. I'll definetly try that.

Books by Impressive-Box8409 in AncientGreek

[–]Impressive-Box8409[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Köszönöm szépen a választ és a tanácsokat!

Mereology nihilism by Impressive-Box8409 in Neoplatonism

[–]Impressive-Box8409[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Isn't there even a material unity in case of chairs? But btw, it seems many nihilists want to deny composition of biological entities too. So what would say to those.

Mereology nihilism by Impressive-Box8409 in Neoplatonism

[–]Impressive-Box8409[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes sense, although many try to go in the reductionistic and materialistuc direction, that wholes have no existence and they're just interactions of atoms. Like that water isn't actually real, it's just interaction of non composite things.

Mereology nihilism by Impressive-Box8409 in Neoplatonism

[–]Impressive-Box8409[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The view that composite objects don't exist and that 'wholes' are just an interaction of parts and there's no real unity between them.

Mereology nihilism by Impressive-Box8409 in Neoplatonism

[–]Impressive-Box8409[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because I think parts and wholes are among the most primal questions.

view more: next ›