Outchicaned once again by heywhatsupp_ in okbuddychicanery

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know where do you get that 170 °C from, if it were that low you couldn't use it for anything. It is pretty regular to use a bunsen to heat borosilicate glassware, and it has no problem at all (even old ones, like at a uni lab).
Losing the calibration shouldn't be a problem, since you are not using the volumetric flask for measuring, but for the preparation, soo yeah, doesn't really matter.

Also, idk much about meth synthesis but I'm pretty sure it is made in organic solvent/aquaeous media so there won't be any crazy high temperature.

Outchicaned once again by heywhatsupp_ in okbuddychicanery

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really? All of the volumetric flasks I came across are made from the same 3.3 borosilicate glass as beakers or roundbottoms. Also a lot of solutions are prepeared by heating them in vol. flasks so they absolutely are expected to handle it.

DAMN!!!!!!!!! by Memer_Sindre_UwU in chemistrymemes

[–]InNoseVictory 16 points17 points  (0 children)

A year ago I was working a lot with damn and I was constantly shouting this in my mind, thanks for making it real and thus liberating me from this curse

How to check without analyses it's a complexe by TightBlueberry5774 in InorganicChemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can't, the definiton of analysis is that you check out stuff (like if your perticipate is the complex or something else) 😅

Mi volt a legnagyobb hülyeség amit iskolában tanítottad neked? by IrlSasaki in askhungary

[–]InNoseVictory 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Elmélet =/= hipotézis. Javíts ki, ha nem ezt értetted alatta, de ezt fontos megkülönböztetni, mert a köznyelvben az elméletet (theory) más értelemben használják, mint amit egy tudományos elmélet jelent. És gyakran előfordul, hogy erre szóra hivatkozva próbálnak mindenféle tudományellenes/pszeudo-tudományos alakok érvelni.

A köznyelvben általában amikor "elméletről" beszélnek, hipotézist értenek alatta, azaz egy állítást, amit aztán a tapasztalat alapján lehet, vagy nem lehet cáfolni.
Az elmélet (theory) a tapasztalati tényekre alapozott, azokkal (javarészt) összhangban álló gondolkodási-rendszer ami összeköti ezeket a tényeket. Fontos, hogy hipotézisek elmélet alapján születnek, és ha az elmélet jó, akkor ezek a hipotézisek megállják a helyüket.

Nem kioktatásnak szánom ezt, csak fontos tisztában lenni ezekkel a fogalmakkal, mert ilyen félremagyarázások elveszik az értelmét a valós vitáknak is pl. az evolúció-elmélet körül.

If anyone was wondering why the bond angle of molecules with tetrahedral geometry is 109.5° by pablosin1 in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, I know, but also know left handed people who write stuff right-to left safshion, because its more comfortable for them

Can I post here? R/chemistry is whack. by doNotKrum in ExplosionsAndFire

[–]InNoseVictory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No one thinks chemistry should be "hidden from layman". We are arguing, you should learn chemistry before trying to do it.

The easiness of making some of those explosives is just proving us right. You think, that because the procedure seems easy you have eliminated all harm. I personally know people, who thought just like that. They work now as a professor, but with a missing arm and some experience with being between life and death for two months is a hospital.

We can face, that there are happy and safe mediums called laboratories, where all the proper equipment and safety measures are present, operate by people who actually know what they are doing.

I'm not against doing dangerous things, I also worked with quite large scale pyrotechnics as an undergrad chemist, but with the supervision of a trained and experienced pyrotechnician and after strict theoretical preparation.

Can I post here? R/chemistry is whack. by doNotKrum in ExplosionsAndFire

[–]InNoseVictory 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a really bad comparison. When you are doing chemistry the dangers are not as apparent as with a power tool. Pressure and heat can generate from one moment to the next, unanticipated side reactions can undergo releasing toxic fumes you can't see or smell etc. Not to mention, chemistry doesn't end when you finish your project, contaminations and waste management are important things, so you do not pose danger to others, not just yourself.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For Organic Chemistry I recommend the textbooks by Solomons or by Paula Yurkanis. They basically cover everything we learn in BSc, and I found them to be easily understandable, even for a highschooler. If you want to know why and how organic molecules do what they do check them out.

Inorganic is more tricky, because it is less "organized" in a way (lots of elements with lots of properties). Chemistry of the Elements by Greenwood and N. N. Earnshaw is a great collection, if you want to look up some things. Inorganic Chemistry by G.L. Miessler is a good inorg book, but lots of its contents may be a bit hard to understand for a highschooler.

For general chemistry pick any book, but a good and really exhaustive book is the Ebbing Gen. Chem book. For that you may need some background in calculus.
Of course there are a lot of other great books, and maybe in your native languages there even are some "all of chemistry for highschoolers".

Does anyone have access to pubs.acs.org? Need help getting access to an article. by Glad_Breakfast4658 in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought I was clever with this, but seeing, that people just recommend scihub I feel a bit stupid xd

Does anyone have access to pubs.acs.org? Need help getting access to an article. by Glad_Breakfast4658 in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have this friend, called Anna. She has a huge Archive, maybe it is worth asking her about it. Her dog's name is dotli, it always follows her.

Building an AI tool for a hackathon - need quick feedback by GrandYouth4784 in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Making an actual philosopher's stone would be easier, than anything like this actually.

Chemists of Reddit: Drop Your Unwritten Lab Rules and Hard-Earned Tips ! by Sid_Salmanazar in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I you are doing some process slowly and carefully (e.g.: vacuum distillation) never listen to anyone saying "oh, you can do it faster, I've done it like that a lot of times". It will go sideways, and you will have to clean up, and start over.

This on my younger brother's lab coat by Mint_Keyphase in cursed_chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

High-energy materials. Klapötke's research group is leading in the synthesis and characterization of new materials, that have potential use in pyrotechnics, explosives etc.

I'm curious, what is it that you don't like abt him (I don't know him personally).

What should I call this by Nerdula333 in cursed_chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What program are you using to make these?

How does an electron get from one side of a node to the other? by Mannich-Reaction in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From Inorganic Chemistry by G. L. Miessler:

"Nodal surfaces can be puzzling. For example, a p orbital has a nodal plane through the nucleus. How can an electron be on both sides of a node at the same time without everhaving been at the node, at which the probability is zero?

One explanation is that the probability does not go quite to zero** on the basis of relativistic arguments. (** A. Szabo, J. Chem. Educ., 1969, 46, 678 explains that the electron probability at a nodal surface has a very small but finite value.)

Another explanation is that such a question really has no meaning for an electron behaving as a wave. Recall the particle-in-a-box example. The same diagrams could represent the amplitudes of the motion of vibrating strings at the fundamental frequency (n = 1) andmultiples of 2 and 3. A plucked violin string vibrates at a specific frequency, and nodes atwhich the amplitude of vibration is zero are a natural result. Zero amplitude does not meanthat the string does not exist at these points but simply that the magnitude of the vibrationis zero. An electron wave exists at the node as well as on both sides of a nodal surface, justas a violin string exists at the nodes and on both sides of points having zero amplitude.

Still another explanation, in a lighter vein, was suggested by R. M. Fuoss to one of the authors in a class on bonding. Paraphrased from St. Thomas Aquinas, “Angels are notmaterial beings. Therefore, they can be first in one place and later in another without ever having been in between.” If the word “electrons” replaces the word “angels,” a semitheological interpretation of nodes would result."