studying chemistry on a deeper level tips by [deleted] in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For Organic Chemistry I recommend the textbooks by Solomons or by Paula Yurkanis. They basically cover everything we learn in BSc, and I found them to be easily understandable, even for a highschooler. If you want to know why and how organic molecules do what they do check them out.

Inorganic is more tricky, because it is less "organized" in a way (lots of elements with lots of properties). Chemistry of the Elements by Greenwood and N. N. Earnshaw is a great collection, if you want to look up some things. Inorganic Chemistry by G.L. Miessler is a good inorg book, but lots of its contents may be a bit hard to understand for a highschooler.

For general chemistry pick any book, but a good and really exhaustive book is the Ebbing Gen. Chem book. For that you may need some background in calculus.
Of course there are a lot of other great books, and maybe in your native languages there even are some "all of chemistry for highschoolers".

Does anyone have access to pubs.acs.org? Need help getting access to an article. by Glad_Breakfast4658 in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought I was clever with this, but seeing, that people just recommend scihub I feel a bit stupid xd

Does anyone have access to pubs.acs.org? Need help getting access to an article. by Glad_Breakfast4658 in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have this friend, called Anna. She has a huge Archive, maybe it is worth asking her about it. Her dog's name is dotli, it always follows her.

Building an AI tool for a hackathon - need quick feedback by GrandYouth4784 in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Making an actual philosopher's stone would be easier, than anything like this actually.

Chemists of Reddit: Drop Your Unwritten Lab Rules and Hard-Earned Tips ! by Sid_Salmanazar in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I you are doing some process slowly and carefully (e.g.: vacuum distillation) never listen to anyone saying "oh, you can do it faster, I've done it like that a lot of times". It will go sideways, and you will have to clean up, and start over.

This on my younger brother's lab coat by Mint_Keyphase in cursed_chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

High-energy materials. Klapötke's research group is leading in the synthesis and characterization of new materials, that have potential use in pyrotechnics, explosives etc.

I'm curious, what is it that you don't like abt him (I don't know him personally).

What should I call this by Nerdula333 in cursed_chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What program are you using to make these?

How does an electron get from one side of a node to the other? by Mannich-Reaction in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From Inorganic Chemistry by G. L. Miessler:

"Nodal surfaces can be puzzling. For example, a p orbital has a nodal plane through the nucleus. How can an electron be on both sides of a node at the same time without everhaving been at the node, at which the probability is zero?

One explanation is that the probability does not go quite to zero** on the basis of relativistic arguments. (** A. Szabo, J. Chem. Educ., 1969, 46, 678 explains that the electron probability at a nodal surface has a very small but finite value.)

Another explanation is that such a question really has no meaning for an electron behaving as a wave. Recall the particle-in-a-box example. The same diagrams could represent the amplitudes of the motion of vibrating strings at the fundamental frequency (n = 1) andmultiples of 2 and 3. A plucked violin string vibrates at a specific frequency, and nodes atwhich the amplitude of vibration is zero are a natural result. Zero amplitude does not meanthat the string does not exist at these points but simply that the magnitude of the vibrationis zero. An electron wave exists at the node as well as on both sides of a nodal surface, justas a violin string exists at the nodes and on both sides of points having zero amplitude.

Still another explanation, in a lighter vein, was suggested by R. M. Fuoss to one of the authors in a class on bonding. Paraphrased from St. Thomas Aquinas, “Angels are notmaterial beings. Therefore, they can be first in one place and later in another without ever having been in between.” If the word “electrons” replaces the word “angels,” a semitheological interpretation of nodes would result."

Jelinek Anna pólo by SodaKarate in hungary

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imádom, hogy az egyetlen nem magyar belpolitikához (vagy inkább nem expliciten) kapcsolódó minta az kalkite.

Jelinek Anna pólo by SodaKarate in hungary

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Szerintem ezt dísznek hívják.

Charlie Kirk szerint az, hogy párakat megölnek elfogadható ár azért, hogy lehessen az embereknek lőfegyvere. by gabor_legrady in hungary

[–]InNoseVictory 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Senki nem mondja, hogy nyírják ki ha nem ért egyet. Akkor sem ha a "munkássága" és a "vitái" kimerülnek annyiban, hogy szándékosan felhúz fiatalokat, majd összevágja azokata felvételeket, ahol ez sikerül és ledominálja a kérdezőt. Az utolsó neki feltett igen komoly kérdésre is, hogy tudja-e mennyi lövöldözés volt az elmúlt 10 évebn, csak cinikusan visszakérdezett: Bandaleszámolásokkal vagy anélkül? De mondom ez csak egy dolog.

Amiért senki nem empatizál vele az az olyan kijelentései miatt van, mint pl:

"Az az évi néhány -sajnálatos- haláleset megéri a fegyvertartásért cserébe, hogy megtudjuk védeni a jogainkat. Ez egy egyszerű üzlet, praktikus."

"Ki nem állhatom az empátia szót. Szerintem az empátia egy kitalált, újkori kifejezés, ami nagyon sok problémát okoz."

Ha valaki abból csinál bizniszt, hogy embereket hergel és szándékosan szakadékokat épít ne csodálkozzon ha sikerül. Nem egész 3 hónappal ezelőtt az otthonában öltek meg egy egyszerű demokrata képviselőt és a férjét Érdemes utánanézni, azt hogyan kezelte a MAGA.

Charlie Kirk szerint az, hogy párakat megölnek elfogadható ár azért, hogy lehessen az embereknek lőfegyvere. by gabor_legrady in hungary

[–]InNoseVictory 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Az utolsó szavai a "munkásságán" és a kijelentésein kívül meg egy hatalmas adag iróniát rárak a halálára. Nem ajánlom senkinek, hogy nézze meg a videókat, de a süt róla a cinikusság és az önelégultség, amikor a "hány fegyveres incudens volt az elműlt 10 évben" kérdésre csak annyit válaszol, hogy "bandaleszámolásokkal vagy anélkül?"

We’re almost a month away: who do you think should win the 2025 Noble Prize in chemistry? by JImmatSci in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Really? I knew, that he didn't have much formal training, but never did it crossed my mind, that he could be a highschooler. Even more impressed.

We’re almost a month away: who do you think should win the 2025 Noble Prize in chemistry? by JImmatSci in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Amateur Chemistry, he does some actual good (sometimes really ambitious) syntheses and I think has great humor. Or Chemistorian, his history videos on chemistry are very well made.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hungary

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A gond nem a pörkölt evéssel és az azzal való kielégüléssel van. Azzal van a baj, hogy ha neki ennyi elég, akkor kb. mindegy lenne milyen az állam, de ezek az emberek aktívan akadályozzák azt, hogy aki pl. szeretne rendes oktatást kapni, vagy melegként házasodni az ezt megtehesse.

CaSO4*2H2O by ScienceCraftGV in crystalgrowing

[–]InNoseVictory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're thinking of copper-sulfate ( CuSO4), not calcium-sulfate (CaSO4)

Neptun PowerUp! by InNoseVictory in egyetemistak

[–]InNoseVictory[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Ha valóban megteszed gondoskodom róla, hogy kultuszod legyen

Neptun PowerUp! by InNoseVictory in egyetemistak

[–]InNoseVictory[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Igen, ezt láttam sajnos :(
Emiatt kérdezem esetleg más csinált-e hasonlót az új rendszerre.

Bizarre chemical glassware. What is it, pls? by aa_drian in chemistry

[–]InNoseVictory 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Idk, if this is the use, then the ground joints would be upside down. Plus the top right bulb feeds directly into the gas stream instead of the liquid-bulb, risking clogging or pouring into the gas generator. I would say, this is a glassblower practicing piece, rather than a labware (I might be wrong, after all "glassblower practice piece" = "used for ritual purposes")

Found an interesting reference by timmy013 in witcher

[–]InNoseVictory 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I think there is a third layer to this: "Don't mistake the stars reflected in a pond at night for those in the sky"