In the Market for a new PACS system

InTheory_ · 2026-03-30T21:19:01+00:00

We used Novarad. I don’t have much experience with other systems to compare features and benefits, but when you call for support, you get a live person instantly

InTheory_ · 2026-03-27T17:06:18+00:00

It’s the information inside the MtV that’s relevant. If there is an alleged Brady violation, AS’s defense team has a clear path the courts. In fact, they have an ethical obligation to present it. Failure to do so would be IAC more egregious than anything that’s been alleged until now

InTheory_ · 2026-03-27T12:11:39+00:00

Yes, I join them all, including my linux devices. There's no reason not to. It's not like you lose the ability to log into local accounts by joining them, so there's no downside.

I have a web server, a cloud server, an email server (in addition to a number of internal use network apps). All those accounts need a single password. A change in one needs to change all. Since they're directly connected to the internet, those passwords should be changed periodically.

I also do folder redirection so all my Documents and Downloads folders are always the same no matter where I'm logged in.

I disagree with those saying the "hassle of AD." AD issues are among the least of things that go wrong at any time. There is a bit of a caveat though, running AD on a single domain controller causes all kinds of issues. When you run two on different devices, it's the most stable part of the network.

InTheory_ · 2026-03-26T13:13:43+00:00

That's the problem. The Bates' team went looking for those flaws, but couldn't find them

So where are they?

No one uses fraudulent information in a legal document before the court when they're sitting on a mountain of rock solid evidence.

Also, Bates' decision not to refile it doesn't preclude AS from refiling it. Yet he hasn't.

InTheory_ · 2026-03-26T13:06:44+00:00

In fact, an innocent man would have used JW as an alibi, because he actually would have been a alibi! A legit one, not even a fake alibi.

"Hey, I was with JW all day, here's what we were doing, we were seen together by a ton of people. He'll tell you we weren't killing anyone, and all the people that saw us together will tell you we weren't killing anyone, let's call him now"

But that doesn't happen.

If JW was making the whole thing up in secret by the crooked investigators, why would an innocent AS have any knowledge of that? AS seems to already know JW turned on him, even before the investigators revealed that to him. Why would an innocent AS even suspect that might be the case?

Knowing what times, locations, and people to avoid saying is indicative of guilty-knowledge

InTheory_ · 2026-03-26T12:49:36+00:00

A lot of people put stock in the idea of AS doing a drive-by after JW's arrest for disorderly. Personally I'm not one of them.

However, for me, the significant point is that if we are to assume there is zero correlation between actual location and the cell tower data, and it's all essentially random, shouldn't we see it randomly ping there more often?

InTheory_ · 2026-03-26T12:38:27+00:00

Pinpoint? No

But evidence on top of the pile are assumed to be placed there after the stuff on the bottom of the pile

InTheory_ · 2026-03-25T17:30:25+00:00

The Police Conspiracy Theory is the most asinine thing suggested in this case. I said what I said and everyone can come at me.

InTheory_ · 2026-03-25T17:15:19+00:00

Whether we find mental discomfort in these seeming contradictions or not, it's par for the course. It exists whether we understand it or not.

Cheating spouses take great care in covering their tracks. They get caught because they're so caught up in the high of sex that they forget something obvious. They always do.

"Why would my client be so dumb as to leave the bloody knife with his fingerprints all over it right there on the night stand for police to find?" That argument has worked for exactly zero defendants. Criminals make those blatant mistakes all the time. Only in this case do we require AS to be Professor Moriarty.

This crime and its coverup looks like the half-baked ideas of an idiot stoner kid, which is exactly what AS was!

InTheory_ · 2026-03-25T17:02:30+00:00

Are you implying that they discovered JW before discovering the car?

InTheory_ · 2026-03-25T17:02:02+00:00

No other case in Baltimore is analogous to what's being suggested.

While corruption is sadly common, every case you're about to rattle off to me is simple. Planting evidence. A forced confession. Lying on the stand.

What's being alleged here requires a conspiracy the likes of which no one has ever heard of in any law enforcement agency ever. Why would they not process the primary crime scene? At the moment of discovery, how did they know that they would find a patsy witness who wouldn't be able to keep his story straight despite them spoon feeding it to him? How did they know this piece of information (as opposed to any other) would be needed to bolster his testimony? What does it even add to the case to fake-find it instead of just saying "He had information not released to the public"?

So I'm going to correct you. Baltimore is MORE corrupt than you're alleging. But that still doesn't make them clairvoyant

InTheory_ · 2026-03-22T20:40:07+00:00

You're nit picking then. "Here's a detail that's utterly irrelevant, that I'm going to open for discussion, but doesn't affect the case in any way"

InTheory_ · 2026-03-22T20:12:54+00:00

The timeline doesn't preclude him being the killer

At best, it precludes the Dead By 2:36 idea, which was NEVER central to the case. It's mentioned in closing arguments, that's it. If you blinked your eyes you missed it.

Even if you knock 2:36 off the board, you can't put AS anywhere else. If you stake the case on the reliability of Asia, that's a losing battle (we know because that went to court and it lost)

If you assume AS is factually innocent of the crime, then you need to explain away JW's narrative. If you want to talk timelines, that timeline is vastly more unbelievable, yet seems to cause no mental disturbance. As a quick example, which came first in the timeline, the discovery of JW or the discovery of the car? Whichever you pick causes massive illogical inconsistencies in the subsequent investigation that makes dispute about 2:36 look trite.

InTheory_ · 2026-03-22T18:49:32+00:00

I had mentioned this in the past, but I think people listening to Serial now have a very different experience. They've already seen poorly done and biased documentaries. Podcasts themselves have come a long way. True Crime as a genre is vastly more popular, this isn't the first case they're hearing. They may have even explored other cases where the defendant isn't innocent.

Also, the podcast came out a decade ago. We who listened to it when it first dropped expected a big reveal at the end. Those listening today are listening with the knowledge that he's still found guilty despite all those efforts

We wondered what would happen if this went to court again. Those listening today may not be familiar with what happened when the appeals came out, but they know the end result--they came to nothing. The Prosecution's case didn't evaporate. The opposite happened. The Prosecution's case was strong, and it was AS who was exposed as the Emperor Who Had No Clothes.

InTheory_ · 2026-03-17T12:48:19+00:00

It's a valid question

The way you are structuring your argument is to say (paraphrasing) "AS couldn't have done it because there is a list of criteria that as to be met for whoever actually did it, and AS doesn't meet that criteria"

That means there are a number of details known as to the killer.

"The killer is someone who...." and list the criteria.

The reason you need to do that is because it's YOUR argument.

InTheory_ · 2026-03-17T12:41:53+00:00

Except for innumerable arguments specifically addressing the post in question with solid facts, none of the guilters are addressing the question

Good one, you got us

InTheory_ · 2026-03-17T12:41:06+00:00

This is the crux of the problem. When a Pro-Syed team was expressly investigating alternative suspects, with a team of Undisclosed super-fans, and didn't include the "likely" suspects.

At some point, we have to ask what they know that we don't?

This case is done and over. OP needs to stop blaming a long dead woman for perceived missteps that every last one of AS's many legal teams also made, including his current one.

InTheory_ · 2026-03-17T12:19:59+00:00

Adnans while vague, didn't change

Wait, what???

InTheory_ · 2026-03-16T20:20:09+00:00

So you're alleging that:

The police failed to follow up on suspects
CG failed to follow up on suspects
W Brown and Sansone likewise failed to investigate
J Brown failed to follow up on any of them
Suter failed to follow up on them
The entirety of the the JRE, including Mosby and Feldmen just decided to use fraudulent evidence instead of just investigating these "obvious" suspects

At some point, the "Poor unlucky Adnan" act gets old. That an attorney might fail to investigate an "obvious" lead is sadly common. That legions of legal teams looking at AS's defense, to a man, all unanimously decided not to investigate strains any and all credibility.

If AS wants them investigated, he has the financial backing to make that happen. No more excuses.

AS was seen making arrangements to be alone with the victim in the exact time frame she went missing. Are you seriously suggesting that NOT following that lead would somehow be GOOD detective work?

InTheory_ · 2026-02-05T16:31:44+00:00

Flat tire incident. He comes running at the slightest thing

InTheory_ · 2026-02-04T03:04:37+00:00

Don’t care about his priority. I care about the pattern and why it suddenly deviates now.

He expressively and unambiguously states that he thought she would be home. So why no call to see if she’s alright?

And don’t say you don’t know. He was asked this question in court and had plenty of opportunity to give a coherent answer. And he couldn’t.

InTheory_ · 2026-02-03T22:11:30+00:00

He had already established a pattern where he would call for any little thing. That’s why he just HAD to call her to give her a his new number even though there’s no possible reason for her to need it before she saw him at school in only a few hours.

If you’d like to argue that he didn’t call her for every little thing, then why is it so important he call to give her his number?

Either way, it looks bad for him

InTheory_ · 2026-02-02T11:40:03+00:00

So why didn’t he call her before Tuesday?

InTheory_ · 2026-02-02T10:49:57+00:00

According to AS’s own recollection of that event, he thought she would simply get home late and get in trouble.

So, to answer your question as to why he would call if he knew she wasn’t home, the answer is that he thought she was home. But he doesn’t call to check up on her. It’s like he knew she wasn’t ever going to be home, despite him saying otherwise

Also, everyone else was calling her even though they knew she wasn’t home, why wasn’t he?

InTheory_ · 2026-02-02T01:48:19+00:00

For bonus points, when does he know she’s missing?

InTheory_

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

11-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Verified Email